Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 10, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2233011336
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2233011336v1
223/3/652    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levine, D.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levine, D.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, P. D.
(Radiology 2002;223:652-660.)
© RSNA, 2002


Obstetric Imaging

MR Imaging Appearance of Fetal Cerebral Ventricular Morphology1

Deborah Levine, MD, Isabelle Trop, MD, Tejas S. Mehta, MD and Patrick D. Barnes, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston MA 02215 (D.L., T.S.M.); Department of Radiology, Saint-Luc, Hospitalier de l’Universite de Montreal St-Denis, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (I.T.); and Department of Radiology, Lucille Salter Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, Palo Alto, Calif (P.D.B.). Received August 6, 2001; revision requested September 28; revision received October 15; accepted December 10. Supported by NIH grant NS37942. Address correspondence to D.L. (e-mail: dlevine@caregroup.harvard.edu).

PURPOSE: To elucidate further the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging appearance of fetal cerebral ventricles by comparing ultrasonographic (US) and MR images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of MR and US images was performed for 110 normal fetuses and 94 fetuses with central nervous system abnormalities to assess lateral ventricular morphology as having (a) a normal appearance, (b) mild, disproportionate dilatation of the occipital horns with overall preservation of ventricular morphology, (c) colpocephaly with or without normal orientation of the frontal horns, (d) abnormal orientation of the frontal horns without colpocephaly, (e) an angular appearance, (f) fused frontal horns, (g) global dilation, or (h) a distorted appearance. Ventricular morphology on US and MR images was compared and correlated with reference standard diagnoses.

RESULTS: US and MR imaging classifications were concordant in 145 of 188 (77%) examinations. Mild disproportion of occipital horns with respect to frontal horns was seen only on MR images. This ventricular configuration was present in eight of 110 normal fetuses and in 10 of 16 fetuses with isolated mild ventriculomegaly (P < .001). An angular configuration of the lateral ventricles, which is seen in fetuses with neural tube defects (NTDs), was present on review of MR images in 11 fetuses and on US images in one fetus. The ventricles of fetuses with NTDs and angular ventricles (3–12 mm) were significantly smaller than those of fetuses with NTDs and global dilatation of the ventricles (13–25 mm; P < .05).

CONCLUSION: Ventricular contours differ with differing diagnoses of central nervous system abnormalities.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Fetus, abnormalities, 856.862 • Fetus, central nervous system, 856.874




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
A. L. Callen and R. A. Filly
Supratentorial Abnormalities in the Chiari II Malformation, I: The Ventricular "Point"
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2008; 27(1): 33 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
B. R. Benacerraf, T. D. Shipp, B. Bromley, and D. Levine
What Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Add to the Prenatal Sonographic Diagnosis of Ventriculomegaly?
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2007; 26(11): 1513 - 1522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
O.A. Glenn and A.J. Barkovich
Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis, part 1.
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2006; 27(8): 1604 - 1611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
D. V. Valsky, L. Ben-Sira, S. Porat, N. Yanai, A. Lewin, M. Nadjari, J. M. Gomori, and S. Yagel
The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Isolated Mild Ventriculomegaly
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2004; 23(4): 519 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. Benveniste, J. S. Fowler, W. D. Rooney, D. H. Moller, W. W. Backus, D. A. Warner, P. Carter, P. King, B. Scharf, D. A. Alexoff, et al.
Maternal-Fetal In Vivo Imaging: A Combined PET and MRI Study
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2003; 44(9): 1522 - 1530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.