Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online before print May 3, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2233011079
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2233011079v1
223/3/695    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.
(Radiology 2002;223:695-701.)
© RSNA, 2002

Experimental Studies

Detection of Pulmonary Edema in Pigs: Storage Phosphor versus Amorphous Selenium-based Flat-Panel-Detector Radiography1

Tae Sung Kim, MD, Jung-Gi Im, MD, Jin Mo Goo, MD, Kyoung Ho Lee, MD, Yu-Jin Lee, MD, Se Hyung Kim, MD and Seonwoo Kim, PhD

1 From the Dept of Radiology, Samsung Med Ctr, Sungkyunkwan Univ School of Med, Seoul, Korea (T.S.K.); Dept of Radiology, Seoul National Univ Coll of Med and Institute of Radiation Med, Seoul National University Med Research Ctr, 28 Yongon-dong, Chongro-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea (J.G.I., J.M.G., K.H.L., Y.J.L., S.H.K.); and Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Samsung Med Ctr, Seoul, Korea (S.K.). Received Jun 20, 2001; revision requested Aug 13; revision received Sep 19; accepted Oct 16. Supported in part by grant HMP-98-G-1-014 of the Highly Advanced National Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea. Address correspondence to J.G.I. (e-mail: imjg@radcom.snu.ac.kr).

PURPOSE: To compare diagnostic accuracy of soft-copy selenium-based digital radiographic images and soft-copy computed radiographic images obtained for detection of pulmonary edema in pigs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Oleic acid was injected intraatrially into three pigs (weight, 20–25 kg) at doses of 0.04, 0.05, and 0.06 mL/kg to induce pulmonary edema. Thirty-seven sets of computed radiographic, digital radiographic, and thin-section computed tomographic (CT) scans were obtained every 20–30 minutes in three pigs over 4–6 hours. Images were masked for identity, randomly sorted, and displayed on a monitor. Four radiologists rated each image for presence of parenchymal opacities by using a dichotomous scoring system in two sessions. Presence of pulmonary edema was determined with thin-section CT and a severity scale. Intra- and interobserver variations were determined with the {kappa} statistic and the Z test and with the Cochran Q test and the McNemar test, respectively. True-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative rates were determined. McNemar test was used to determine statistical significance of differences in detection between computed and digital radiographic images.

RESULTS: There was no significant intra- or interobserver variation, except for one pair of observers during the first interpretative session with computed radiographic images (P = .016, McNemar test). Overall sensitivity (92.1%) and diagnostic accuracy (90.2%) of digital radiography were significantly higher than those of computed radiography (79.6% and 83.4%, respectively) (P < .001 for sensitivity, P = .01 for diagnostic accuracy, McNemar test). In detection of minimal and mild pulmonary edema, sensitivity of digital radiography (84%) was significantly higher than that of computed radiography (58%) (P < .001).

CONCLUSION: Soft-copy digital radiographic images are superior to soft-copy computed radiographic images obtained for detection of mild pulmonary edema in pigs.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Animals • Computed tomography (CT), high-resolution, 60.12118 • Experimental study • Lung, edema, 60.71 • Radiography, comparative studies • Radiography, digital, 60.1215 • Radiography, selenium detector, 60.1215 • Radiography, storage phosphor, 60.1215




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 RadioGraphicsHome page
M. Korner, C. H. Weber, S. Wirth, K.-J. Pfeifer, M. F. Reiser, and M. Treitl
Advances in Digital Radiography: Physical Principles and System Overview
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 675 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Bacher, P. Smeets, L. Vereecken, A. De Hauwere, P. Duyck, R. De Man, K. Verstraete, and H. Thierens
Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 630 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
H. P. Busch and K. Faulkner
Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 143 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]