HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2241010894v1 224/1/171    most recent Submit a response View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Keberle, M. Articles by Hahn, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Keberle, M. Articles by Hahn, D.

Single-Bolus Technique for Spiral CT of Laryngopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Comparison of Different Contrast Material Volumes, Flow Rates, and Start Delays¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Strasse 2, 97080 Würzburg, Germany. Received May 7, 2001; revision requested June 22; revision received October 1; accepted December 18. Address correspondence to M.K. (e-mail: marc.keberle@mail.uni-wuerzburg.de).

PURPOSE: To evaluate different contrast material volumes, flow rates, and start delays for contrast material enhancement of neck structures and squamous cell carcinoma to determine the most effective examination protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy patients with squamous cell carcinoma were prospectively randomized into four groups for examination with different protocols (125 mL of contrast material administered at a flow rate of 2.5 mL/sec, 100 mL at 2.0 mL/sec, 90 mL at 1.5 mL/sec, or 70 mL at 1.0 mL/sec). Dynamic series were performed on the tumors and relevant anatomic structures to obtain time-attenuation curves. The protocols were compared (analysis of variance and Tukey-Kramer tests) with regard to time and level of maximum tumor enhancement and carotid arterial enhancement of more than 150 HU. One selected protocol was tested in 30 additional routine examinations with start delays of 40 seconds (for laryngeal and/or hypopharyngeal tumors, 3-mm collimation) and 45 seconds (for oropharyngeal tumors, 5-mm collimation).

RESULTS: Except for the 70-mL bolus administered at 1.0 mL/sec, the other protocols performed similarly well, yielding comparable maximum tumor enhancement at 52 seconds and later. In spite of a smaller volume of 90 mL, due to the prolonged flow time at 1.5 mL/sec, carotid arterial enhancement of more than 150 HU was prolonged (when compared with that in 100- or 125-mL protocols). As a result of these circumstances, injection of 90 mL at 1.5 mL/sec was considered more effective, providing no significant differences in tumor (P = .39) or carotid arterial (P = .52) enhancement between routine examinations and dynamic series.

CONCLUSION: A single bolus of 90 mL administered at 1.5 mL/sec appears to be the most desirable protocol for contrast enhancement.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), helical, 272.12115 • Larynx, CT, 271.12112, 271.12113, 271.12114 • Larynx, neoplasms, 2718.373 • Pharynx, CT, 272.12112, 272.12113, 272.12114 • Pharynx, neoplasms, 272.373

eLetters: