|
|
||||||||
Health Policy and Practice |
1 From the Research Department (J.H.S., R.S.L.) and Committee on Radiologist Resources (B.S.), American College of Radiology, 1891 Preston White Dr, Reston, VA 20191; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Brown University Medical School, Providence, RI (B.S.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence (B.S.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (H.P.F.). Received July 3, 2001; revision requested August 20; revision received October 9; accepted November 12. Address correspondence to J.H.S. (e-mail: jonathans@acr.org).
PURPOSE: To determine whether data from a professional society placement servicethe Professional Bureau of the American College of Radiologyare a valid measure of the employment market.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For the United States from 1990 to 1998, the authors compared three placement service measuresthe annual number of job listings, job seekers, and listings per seekerwith two presumably valid measures of the employment marketannual total jobs available (which was ascertained from surveys of hiring) and radiologist median income relative to the all-physician median. For the comparisons, both graphic displays of the data and correlation were used.
RESULTS: In graphs, patterns of change were similar. The correlation of job listings, which measure demand, with total jobs, which also measure demand, was 0.84 (P = .04). The correlation of (a) job seekers, a measure of supply, and (b) listings per seeker, which involve both supply and demand, with total jobs was substantial but lower: 0.58 (P = .23) and 0.76 (P = .08), respectively. Correlation of the three placement service measures with relative income, which presumably depends on both supply and demand, was 0.800.88 (P < .05 for each measure).
CONCLUSION: The statistical significance levels of the correlations and the pattern of findingsnamely, stronger correlations among measures of the same aspect of the employment marketindicate that these placement service data are valid and reasonably accurate measures of the employment market.
© RSNA, 2002
Index terms: Economics, medical Radiology and radiologists, socioeconomic issues
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Bhargavan, A. H. Kaye, H. P. Forman, and J. H. Sunshine Workload of Radiologists in United States in 2006-2007 and Trends Since 1991-1992 Radiology, June 9, 2009; (2009) 2522081895. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Licurse, D. D. Saket, J. H. Sunshine, C. D. Maynard, and H. P. Forman Update on the diagnostic radiology employment market: findings through 2005. Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): W249 - W254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Saket, C. C. Nwanze, C. D. Maynard, J. H. Sunshine, and H. P. Forman Update on the Diagnostic Radiologist Employment Market: Findings Through 2004 Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1408 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bhargavan and J. H. Sunshine Workload of Radiologists in the United States in 2002-2003 and Trends Since 1991-1992 Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 920 - 931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Sunshine and Y. S. Cypel Types of Procedures Performed by Diagnostic Radiology Practices: Past Patterns and Future Directions Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1193 - 1201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Sunshine, C. D. Maynard, J. Paros, and H. P. Forman Update on the Diagnostic Radiologist Shortage Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2004; 182(2): 301 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Saketkhoo, J. H. Sunshine, A. M. Covey, and H. P. Forman Findings in 2002 from a Help Wanted Index of Job Advertisements: Is the Job-Market Shortage of Diagnostic Radiologists Easing? Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 351 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bhargavan and J. H. Sunshine Workload of Radiologists in the United States in 1998-1999 and Trends Since 1995-1996 Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179(5): 1123 - 1128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||