HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2241011001v1 224/1/203    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cornud, F. Articles by Moreau, J. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cornud, F. Articles by Moreau, J. F.

Extraprostatic Spread of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Factors Predictive of pT3 Tumor and of Positive Endorectal MR Imaging Examination Results¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., K.H., O.H., J.F.M.) and Urology (Y.C.), Hôpital Necker, Paris, France; Department of Urology, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France (T.F., A.V.); and Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France (L.C.). Received June 6, 2001; revision requested June 27; revision received October 1; accepted October 25. Address correspondence to F.C., 19 Avenue de Tourville, 75007 Paris, France (e-mail: frcornud@wanadoo.fr).

PURPOSE: To identify the factor(s) most predictive of pT3 tumor and those most predictive of a positive endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging result in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: At multivariate analysis, five preoperative clinical parameters—prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, digital rectal examination (DRE) result, Gleason score and number of involved sextants at transrectal US–guided biopsy, and endorectal MR imaging result—were used to predict pT3 tumor in 336 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. On the basis of results of the first four examinations, multivariate analysis was performed also to determine predictors of a positive MR imaging study.

RESULTS: Significant predictors of pT3 tumor were positive MR imaging result (P < 2 x 10^-8), more than one sextant involved at biopsy (P < 5 x 10^-5), and PSA level greater than 10 ng/mL (P < 7 x 10^-3). Significant predictors of a positive MR imaging result were three or more sextants involved at biopsy (P < 10^-5), positive DRE result (P < 5 x 10^-3), and PSA level greater than 10 ng/mL (P < 16 x 10^-3). In the subgroup of 175 patients who had at least three positive biopsy specimens, the sensitivity of MR imaging was 50% for detection of occult pT3 tumor and 69% for detection of extensive pT3 tumor. The overall specificity of MR imaging was 95%.

CONCLUSION: Endorectal MR imaging seems to be indicated in carefully selected patients—specifically, those with three or more positive biopsy specimens, a palpable tumor, and/or a PSA level greater than 10 ng/mL.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Prostate, biopsy, 844.1261 • Prostate neoplasms, 844.32 • Prostate neoplasms, MR, 844.121411, 844.121412, 844.121416

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. K. Kuhl, F. Traber, J. Gieseke, W. Drahanowsky, N. Morakkabati-Spitz, W. Willinek, M. von Falkenhausen, C. Manka, and H. H. Schild Whole-Body High-Field-Strength (3.0-T) MR Imaging in Clinical Practice * Part II. Technical Considerations and Clinical Applications Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 16 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. N. Bloch, E. Furman-Haran, T. H. Helbich, R. E. Lenkinski, H. Degani, C. Kratzik, M. Susani, A. Haitel, S. Jaromi, L. Ngo, et al. Prostate Cancer: Accurate Determination of Extracapsular Extension with High-Spatial-Resolution Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR Imaging Initial Results Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 176 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. W. T. P. J. Heijmink, J. J. Futterer, T. Hambrock, S. Takahashi, T. W. J. Scheenen, H. J. Huisman, C. A. Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, B. C. Knipscheer, L. A. L. M. Kiemeney, J. A. Witjes, et al. Prostate Cancer: Body-Array versus Endorectal Coil MR Imaging at 3 T--Comparison of Image Quality, Localization, and Staging Performance Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 184 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Hricak, P. L. Choyke, S. C. Eberhardt, S. A. Leibel, and P. T. Scardino Imaging Prostate Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Perspective Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 28 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Wang, J. Zhang, L. H. Schwartz, H. Eisenberg, N. M. Ishill, C. S. Moskowitz, P. Scardino, and H. Hricak Incremental Value of Multiplanar Cross-Referencing for Prostate Cancer Staging with Endorectal MRI Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 99 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Wang, H. Hricak, M. W. Kattan, H. N. Chen, K. Kuroiwa, H. F. Eisenberg, and P. T. Scardino Prediction of Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value of Adding Endorectal MR Imaging to the Kattan Nomogram Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 182 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Wang, M. Mullerad, H.-N. Chen, S. C. Eberhardt, M. W. Kattan, P. T. Scardino, and H. Hricak Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value of Endorectal MR Imaging Findings for Prediction of Extracapsular Extension Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 133 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Dhingsa, A. Qayyum, F. V. Coakley, Y. Lu, K. D. Jones, M. G. Swanson, P. R. Carroll, H. Hricak, and J. Kurhanewicz Prostate Cancer Localization with Endorectal MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopic Imaging: Effect of Clinical Data on Reader Accuracy Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 215 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Zakian, S. Eberhardt, H. Hricak, A. Shukla-Dave, S. Kleinman, M. Muruganandham, K. Sircar, M. W. Kattan, V. E. Reuter, P. T. Scardino, et al. Transition Zone Prostate Cancer: Metabolic Characteristics at H MR Spectroscopic Imaging--Initial Results Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 241 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]