Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2241011348
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheiman, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ransil, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheiman, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ransil, B. J.
(Radiology 2002;224:225-230.)
© RSNA, 2002


Ultrasonography

Transmitted Cardiac Pulsations as an Indicator of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Function: Initial Observations1

Robert G. Sheiman, MD, Thomas Vrachliotis, MD, David P. Brophy, MD and Bernard J. Ransil, PhD, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.S., T.V., D.P.B.) and Neurology (B.J.R.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215. Received August 9, 2001; revision requested September 19; revision received November 5; accepted January 7, 2002. Address correspondence to R.G.S. (e-mail: rsheiman@caregroup.harvard.edu).

PURPOSE: To determine if cardiac pulsations are visible and quantifiable on spectral waveforms during Doppler ultrasonographic (US) evaluation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), and if so, whether their magnitude declines with shunt dysfunction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Baseline and prerevision US images obtained in 15 patients with venographically confirmed TIPS malfunction were retrospectively examined for spectral waveform pulsation. Cardiac pulsatility was quantified by using the venous pulsatility index (VPI), the venous equivalent of resistive index. VPIs were obtained at four locations from the main portal vein to the stent–hepatic venous junction. Baseline and follow-up examination results in 11 patients with functional TIPS acted as controls and were evaluated similarly. Baseline and follow-up mean VPIs at all four locations were compared for both sets of patients by using the Newman-Keuls pairwise multiple sample comparison test. The {chi}2 test was used to determine if a VPI threshold that would result in an acceptable sensitivity and specificity for shunt dysfunction existed.

RESULTS: One hundred twenty mean VPIs were obtained in the study group, and 88 mean VPIs were obtained in the control group. Prerevision VPIs at each location were significantly lower (P < .01) than all baseline values and than the follow-up values in the control group. A VPI less than 0.16 was 94% sensitive and 87% specific for shunt dysfunction.

CONCLUSION: The VPI, a quantitative measure of cardiac pulsation obtained with Doppler US, may be a useful parameter for assessing TIPS function.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Hepatic veins, stenosis or obstruction, 957.721, 959.721 • Hepatic veins, US, 957.12983, 957.12984, 957.12989, 959.12983, 959.12984, 959.12989 • Shunts, portosystemic, 957.1268, 959.1268 • Ultrasound (US), Doppler studies, 957.12983, 957.12984, 957.12989, 959.12983, 959.12984, 959.12989







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.