Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2241011352
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kono, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Mattrey, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kono, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Mattrey, R. F.
(Radiology 2002;224:253-257.)
© RSNA, 2002


Experimental Studies

Mechanism of Parenchymal Enhancement of the Liver with a Microbubble-based US Contrast Medium: An Intravital Microscopy Study in Rats1

Yuko Kono, MD, Gregory C. Steinbach, PhD2, Thomas Peterson, BA, Geert W. Schmid-Schönbein, PhD and Robert F. Mattrey, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (Y.K., G.C.S., T.P., R.F.M.) and Bioengineering (G.W.S.S.), University of California, San Diego. From the 2000 RSNA scientific assembly. Received August 9, 2001; revision requested September 28; revision received December 5; accepted January 7, 2002. Supported in part by R01-CA36799 and Alliance Pharmaceutical Corporation. Address correspondence to R.F.M., MRI Institute, 410 Dickinson St, San Diego, CA 92103 (e-mail: rmattrey@ucsd.edu).

PURPOSE: To investigate the mechanism of prolonged contrast material enhancement of the liver observed with the lipid-shell ultrasonographic (US) contrast agent AF0150, with use of intravital microscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight Sprague-Dawley rats were used. Six received fluoroscent microspheres to label the Kupffer cells; two were used as controls. The edge of the middle lobe of the liver was transilluminated with white light. Fluorescent microspheres were observed under fluorescence light. After injection of AF0150, behavior of microbubbles was observed for 6 minutes while viewing a single high-power field. Multiple other fields were then assessed for stationary bubbles and their relation to Kupffer cells. The number of bubbles in motion, aggregated, stationary, and associated with labeled cells were counted.

RESULTS: Of 590 bubbles, 34 (5.8%) became stationary and 556 (94.2%) kept moving. Of the 34 stationary microbubbles, 21 dislodged within 30 seconds. Microbubbles were homogeneously distributed throughout the lobule, in contrast to the dominant periportal distribution of the labeled Kupffer cells. Among 83 stationary bubbles observed from all fields of view, only 14 (17%) were associated with fluorescent-labeled cells.

CONCLUSION: The late parenchymal liver enhancement effect of AF0150 is likely not related to Kupffer-cell uptake, but rather to a mechanical slowdown within the sinusoids.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Experimental study • Liver, US, 761.12988 • Microbubbles, 761.12988 • Ultrasound (US), contrast media, 761.12988




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Leen, P. Ceccotti, C. Kalogeropoulou, W. J. Angerson, S. J. Moug, and P. G. Horgan
Prospective multicenter trial evaluating a novel method of characterizing focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1551 - 1559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Nicolau, R. Vilana, V. Catala, L. Bianchi, R. Gilabert, A. Garcia, and C. Bru
Importance of Evaluating All Vascular Phases on Contrast-Enhanced Sonography in the Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Focal Liver Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 158 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
B. B. Goldberg, D. A. Merton, J.-B. Liu, G. Murphy, and F. Forsberg
Contrast-Enhanced Sonographic Imaging of Lymphatic Channels and Sentinel Lymph Nodes
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2005; 24(7): 953 - 965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
H Maruyama, S Matsutani, H Saisho, Y Mine, N Kamiyama, T Hirata, and M Sasamata
Real-time blood-pool images of contrast enhanced ultrasound with Definity in the detection of tumour nodules in the liver
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2005; 78(930): 512 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. K. P. Lim, N. Patel, R. J. Eckersley, S. D. Taylor-Robinson, D. O. Cosgrove, and M. J. K. Blomley
Evidence for Spleen-specific Uptake of a Microbubble Contrast Agent: A Quantitative Study in Healthy Volunteers
Radiology, June 1, 2004; 231(3): 785 - 788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
K. Shigeta, K. Itoh, S. Ookawara, N. Taniguchi, and K. Omoto
Endothelial Cell Injury and Platelet Aggregation Induced by Contrast Ultrasonography in the Rat Hepatic Sinusoid
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2004; 23(1): 29 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
H-D Liang and M J K Blomley
The role of ultrasound in molecular imaging
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2003; 76(suppl_2): S140 - S150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.