Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2241010798
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lopez Hänninen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Felix, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lopez Hänninen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Felix, R.
(Radiology 2002;224:34-41.)
© RSNA, 2002


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Prospective Evaluation of Pancreatic Tumors: Accuracy of MR Imaging with MR Cholangiopancreatography and MR Angiography1

Enrique Lopez Hänninen, MD, Holger Amthauer, MD, Norbert Hosten, MD, Jens Ricke, MD, Michael Böhmig, MD, Jan Langrehr, MD, Rainer Hintze, MD, Peter Neuhaus, MD, Bertram Wiedenmann, MD, Stefan Rosewicz, MD and Roland Felix, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (E.L.H., H.A., N.H., J.R., R.F.), Visceral and Transplant Surgery (J.L., P.N.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (M.B., R.H., B.W, S.R.), Charité Medical University Center, Campus Virchow Clinic, Humboldt University, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany. Received April 17, 2001; revision requested June 4; revision received August 27; accepted October 10. Address correspondence to E.L.H. (e-mail: enrique.lopez_haenninen@charite.de).

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), and MR angiography in patients suspected of having pancreatic tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients suspected of having pancreatic tumors underwent MR imaging (unenhanced and contrast material–enhanced MR, MRCP, and contrast-enhanced MR angiography). Two blinded readers prospectively analyzed the images by consensus, and results were correlated with surgery, biopsy, or follow-up findings. Results were tabulated in two-by-two tables.

RESULTS: MR assessment of pancreatic lesion status (differentiation of benign vs malignant) resulted in 60 correct diagnoses (accuracy, 91%), and six (10%) false diagnoses. Among histologically proved malignant tumors, MR imaging yielded correct diagnoses in 42 of 44 patients (sensitivity, 95%; 95% CI: 85%, 99%), whereas 18 of 22 patients with benign findings were classified correctly. At MR imaging, findings in four patients with chronic pancreatitis were wrongly categorized as malignant tumors (specificity, 82%; 95% CI: 60%, 95%), and in one patient, a distal common bile duct carcinoma was not detected. In no patient with pancreatic adenocarcinoma was this tumor misdiagnosed as benign. In patients with malignant tumors who underwent resection, local-regional tumor growth and vascular infiltration were accurately classified in 89% and 94%, respectively. MR imaging depicted histologically proved synchronous hepatic metastases in 82%. The positive and negative predictive values for cancer nonresectability were 90% and 83%, respectively, and the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 85%, 69%, and 95%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MR imaging with MRCP and MR angiography offers potential as a noninvasive tool for assessment of patients suspected of having pancreatic tumors.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Magnetic resonance (MR), cholangiopancreatography, 770.1222 • Magnetic resonance (MR), vascular studies, 770.12142 • Pancreas, MR, 770.121412, 770.121415, 770.12142 • Pancreas, neoplasms, 770.32, 770.364 • Pancreatitis, 770.291




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
P. Ghaneh, E. Costello, and J. P Neoptolemos
Biology and management of pancreatic cancer
Gut, August 1, 2007; 56(8): 1134 - 1152.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Ahualli
The Double Duct Sign
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 314 - 315.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
H. R. Cardenes, E. G. Chiorean, J. DeWitt, M. Schmidt, and P. Loehrer
Locally advanced pancreatic cancer: current therapeutic approach.
Oncologist, June 1, 2006; 11(6): 612 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Mataki, S. Takao, K. Maemura, S. Mori, H. Shinchi, S. Natsugoe, and T. Aikou
Carcinoembryonic Antigen Messenger RNA Expression Using Nested Reverse Transcription-PCR in the Peripheral Blood During Follow-up Period of Patients Who Underwent Curative Surgery for Biliary-Pancreatic Cancer: Longitudinal Analyses
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2004; 10(11): 3807 - 3814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Sugita, A. Furuta, K. Ito, N. Fujita, R. Ichinohasama, and S. Takahashi
Periampullary Tumors: High-Spatial-Resolution MR Imaging and Histopathologic Findings in Ampullary Region Specimens
Radiology, June 1, 2004; 231(3): 767 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M K Kalra, M M Maher, P R Mueller, and S Saini
State-of-the-art imaging of pancreatic neoplasms
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2003; 76(912): 857 - 865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.