Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print May 30, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2241011470
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2241011470v1
224/1/42    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoon, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Forman, H. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yoon, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Forman, H. P.
(Radiology 2002;224:42-46.)
© RSNA, 2002


Emergency Radiology

Evaluation of an Emergency Radiology Quality Assurance Program at a Level I Trauma Center: Abdominal and Pelvic CT Studies1

Luke S. Yoon, BS, Andrew H. Haims, MD, James A. Brink, MD, Reuven Rabinovici, MD and Howard P. Forman, MD, MBA

1 From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (L.S.Y., A.H.H., J.A.B., H.P.F.), Trauma Surgery (R.R.), and Economics (H.P.F.), and the School of Management (H.P.F.), Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, 2-332 SP, New Haven, CT 06520. From the 2001 RSNA scientific assembly. Received September 5, 2001; revision requested October 10; revision received November 27; accepted January 7, 2002. Address correspondence to H.P.F. (e-mail: howard.forman@yale.edu).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of a redundant system in improving quality of care in the trauma setting by examining a subset of our quality assurance program.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred thirty-one consecutive abdominal and pelvic CT reports obtained in patients with trauma at a level I trauma center from August 22, 1999, to August 21, 2000, were retrospectively reviewed. Each case was initially interpreted by a board-certified or board-eligible radiologist during evaluation in the emergency department and was subsequently reviewed by a subspecialty abdominal imaging radiologist as part of a quality assurance program. Nineteen cases were excluded because available information was incomplete, resulting in 512 cases in the current study. Cases with discordant interpretations were followed up to discern care change.

RESULTS: Of the 512 trauma cases, 153 (29.9%) showed discordant readings. Review of patient records demonstrated changes in patient care in 12 (7.8%) cases. Three (2.0%) cases were reviewed from the morbidity and mortality records of the Department of Trauma Surgery as a direct result of misinterpretations. Six (4%) cases involved additional diagnostic imaging for reevaluation; in four of these six cases the quality assurance reader’s interpretation was confirmed, while in the other two, the initial interpretations were favored.

CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that discordant radiologic interpretations most often do not result in a change in patient care and outcome. The quality assurance program did, however, identify and lead to changes in care in a number of cases by providing clinically important additional findings.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Abdomen, CT, 70.1211 • Emergency radiology • Pelvis, CT, 80.1211 • Quality assurance




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. B. Ruchman, J. Jaeger, E. F. Wiggins III, S. Seinfeld, V. Thakral, S. Bolla, and S. Wallach
Preliminary Radiology Resident Interpretations Versus Final Attending Radiologist Interpretations and the Impact on Patient Care in a Community Hospital
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 523 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
O. Israel and A. Kuten
Early Detection of Cancer Recurrence: 18F-FDG PET/CT Can Make a Difference in Diagnosis and Patient Care
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 28S - 35S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. P. Sheedy, F. Earnest IV, J. G. Fletcher, J. L. Fidler, and T. L. Hoskin
CT of Small-Bowel Ischemia Associated with Obstruction in Emergency Department Patients: Diagnostic Performance Evaluation
Radiology, December 1, 2006; 241(3): 729 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. D. Saketkhoo, M. Bhargavan, J. H. Sunshine, and H. P. Forman
Emergency Department Image Interpretation Services at Private Community Hospitals
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 190 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Carney, J. Kempf, V. DeCarvalho, A. Yudd, and J. Nosher
Preliminary Interpretations of After-Hours CT and Sonography by Radiology Residents Versus Final Interpretations by Body Imaging Radiologists at a Level 1 Trauma Center
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 367 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.