|
|
||||||||
Medical Physics |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 N University Blvd, Indianapolis, IN 46202 (H.T.W.M., S.G.J.); Department of Radiology, University of California-Davis Medical Center, Sacramento (J.M.B.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St Vincents Medical Center, Indianapolis, Ind (H.L.B.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Memphis (W.C.M.); and Division of Pulmonary Medicine and Critical Care, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY (G.T.L.). Received September 24, 2001; revision requested November 27; revision received December 17; accepted January 22, 2002. Address correspondence to H.T.W.M. (e-mail: hwinermu@iupui.edu).
PURPOSE: To calculate mean fetal radiation dose from helical chest computed tomography (CT) by using maternal-fetal geometries obtained from healthy pregnant women and to compare the calculated CT doses with the fetal doses reported with scintigraphy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Maternal-fetal geometries were determined in 23 pregnant women with varying body mass index and fetal gestational age. Monte Carlo techniques were used to estimate the dose that would be received by each fetus from CT scanning performed with the following parameters: 120 kVp; 100 mA; scanning time, 1 second per section; collimation, 2.5 mm; pitch of 1. Craniocaudal extent of the scan was 11 cm, with the most caudal section edge being 5 mm inferior to the xiphoid process.
RESULTS: For helical CT, estimated mean fetal doses in micrograys at varying gestational ages were as follows: 3.320.2 µGy, first trimester; 7.976.7 µGy, second trimester; and 51.3130.8 µGy, third trimester. These values were all less than mean fetal doses reported with scintigraphy, with 37-74 MBq of macroaggregates of human serum albumin labeled with technetium 99m. If 200 mAs (pitch of 1.8) was used, the mean fetal doses were still less than those with scintigraphy.
CONCLUSION: The average fetal radiation dose with helical CT is less than that with ventilation-perfusion lung scanning during all trimesters.
© RSNA, 2002
Index terms: Embolism, pulmonary, 60.72 Pregnancy, 85.131, 85.47 Radiations, exposure to patients and personnel Thorax, CT, 60.1211, 60.12115
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. K. Pahade, D. Litmanovich, I. Pedrosa, J. Romero, A. A. Bankier, and P. M. Boiselle Quality Initiatives: Imaging Pregnant Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: What the Radiologist Needs to Know RadioGraphics, May 1, 2009; 29(3): 639 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Larson, M. Miller, N. Mehta, S. Dholakia, N. de Mendonca, M. Hayes, G. Bourjeily, K. Rosene-Montella, N. Hoftman, P. E. Marik, et al. Venous Thromboembolic Disease and Pregnancy N. Engl. J. Med., February 5, 2009; 360(6): 638 - 640. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Marik and L. A. Plante Venous Thromboembolic Disease and Pregnancy N. Engl. J. Med., November 6, 2008; 359(19): 2025 - 2033. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members, A. Torbicki, A. Perrier, S. Konstantinides, G. Agnelli, N. Galie, P. Pruszczyk, F. Bengel, A. J.B. Brady, D. Ferreira, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2008; 29(18): 2276 - 2315. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S K DOSHI, I S NEGUS, and J M ODUKO Fetal radiation dose from CT pulmonary angiography in late pregnancy: a phantom study Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2008; 81(968): 653 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Siegel Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism During Pregnancy JAMA, April 9, 2008; 299(14): 1665 - 1665. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Glassroth Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism During Pregnancy--Reply JAMA, April 9, 2008; 299(14): 1665 - 1666. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Jaffe, T. T. Yoshizumi, G. I. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, L. M. Hurwitz, and R. C. Nelson Early First-Trimester Fetal Radiation Dose Estimation in 16-MDCT Without and With Automated Tube Current Modulation Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 860 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Sechopoulos, S. Suryanarayanan, S. Vedantham, C. J. D'Orsi, and A. Karellas Radiation Dose to Organs and Tissues from Mammography: Monte Carlo and Phantom Study Radiology, December 4, 2007; (2007) 2462070256. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Patel, D. L. Reede, D. S. Katz, R. Subramaniam, and J. K. Amorosa Imaging the Pregnant Patient for Nonobstetric Conditions: Algorithms and Radiation Dose Considerations RadioGraphics, November 1, 2007; 27(6): 1705 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. McCollough, B. A. Schueler, T. D. Atwell, N. N. Braun, D. M. Regner, D. L. Brown, and A. J. LeRoy Radiation Exposure and Pregnancy: When Should We Be Concerned? RadioGraphics, July 1, 2007; 27(4): 909 - 917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Scarsbrook and F. V. Gleeson Investigating suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy BMJ, February 24, 2007; 334(7590): 418 - 419. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mohamed, G. K. Dresser, and S. Mehta Acute respiratory failure during pregnancy: a case of nitrofurantoin-induced pneumonitis Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 30, 2007; 176(3): 319 - 320. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Asghar and P. Bowman A clinical approach to the management of thrombosis in obstetrics. Part 2: diagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolism Obstet Gynaecol (Lond), January 1, 2007; 9(1): 3 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Shapiro Critical Care of the Obstetric Patient J Intensive Care Med, September 1, 2006; 21(5): 278 - 286. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Groves, S. J. Yates, T. Win, I. Kayani, F. A. Gallagher, R. Syed, J. Bomanji, and P. J. Ell CT Pulmonary Angiography versus Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy in Pregnancy: Implications from a UK Survey of Doctors' Knowledge of Radiation Exposure Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 765 - 770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Yousefzadeh, M. B. Ward, and C. Reft Internal Barium Shielding to Minimize Fetal Irradiation in Spiral Chest CT: A Phantom Simulation Experiment. Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 751 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Matthews Imaging pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: what is the most appropriate imaging protocol? Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 79(941): 441 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Hurwitz, T. Yoshizumi, R. E. Reiman, P. C. Goodman, E. K. Paulson, D. P. Frush, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, and L. Barnes Radiation Dose to the Fetus from Body MDCT During Early Gestation. Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 871 - 876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Patel and E. A. Kazerooni Helical CT for the Evaluation of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 135 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J H Reid Multislice CT pulmonary angiography and CT venography Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2004; 77(suppl_1): S39 - S45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Hill and E J R van Beek MRI of the chest: present and future Imaging, October 1, 2004; 16(1): 61 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Schuster, J. E. Fishman, J. F. Copeland, H. Hatabu, and P. M. Boiselle Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnant Patients: A Survey of Practices and Policies for CT Pulmonary Angiography Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1495 - 1498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||