Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 28, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2242011283
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2242011283v1
224/2/542    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Covey, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, K. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Covey, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, K. T.
(Radiology 2002;224:542-547.)
© RSNA, 2002


Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Variant Hepatic Arterial Anatomy Revisited: Digital Subtraction Angiography Performed in 600 Patients1

Anne M. Covey, MD, Lynn A. Brody, MD, Mary A. Maluccio, MD, MPH, George I. Getrajdman, MD and Karen T. Brown, MD

1 From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 (A.M.C., L.A.B., G.I.G., K.T.B.); and Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY (M.A.M.). Received July 26, 2001; revision requested September 4; revision received October 23; accepted December 11. Address correspondence to A.M.C. (e-mail: coveya@mskcc.org).

PURPOSE: To evaluate and describe the prevalence of hepatic arterial variants seen at digital subtraction angiography in a large series of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected prospectively by using an arterial anatomy database questionnaire that was completed at the time each visceral angiographic examination was performed from May 1996 to October 2000.

RESULTS: Six hundred patients underwent at least one visceral angiographic examination at one institution during the study period. Three hundred sixty-eight (61.3%) patients had the standard hepatic arterial anatomy. One hundred nineteen (19.8%) patients had variant left hepatic arteries (LHAs), and 89 (14.8%) had variant right hepatic arteries (RHAs). Twenty-eight (4.7%) patients had a variant anatomy involving both the LHA and the RHA. Twenty-four (4.0%) patients had a variant origin of the common hepatic artery (CHA) arising from either the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) or the aorta. In two patients, the proper hepatic artery (PHA) was the first branch of the SMA and the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) was a branch of the celiac axis. Double hepatic arteries were seen in 22 (3.7%) patients. Trifurcation or quadrifurcation of the GDA was seen in 50 (8.3%) patients, and the GDA originated distal to one hepatic artery in 25 (4.2%) patients in whom both hepatic arteries originated from the CHA.

CONCLUSION: A replaced LHA was less common than has been previously reported, and in two cases, the PHA arose from the SMA. Digital subtraction visceral angiographic results are comparable to results of seminal angiographic studies in which the cut-film technique was used.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Angiography, 952.122 • Hepatic arteries, 952.132, 952.92




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
B. Atassi, A. K. Bangash, A. Bahrani, G. Pizzi, R. J. Lewandowski, R. K. Ryu, K. T. Sato, V. L. Gates, M. F. Mulcahy, L. Kulik, et al.
Multimodality Imaging Following 90Y Radioembolization: A Comprehensive Review and Pictorial Essay
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 81 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. B. Winston, N. A. Lee, W. R. Jarnagin, J. Teitcher, R. P. DeMatteo, Y. Fong, and L. H. Blumgart
CT Angiography for Delineation of Celiac and Superior Mesenteric Artery Variants in Patients Undergoing Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): W13 - W19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Nagaoka, S. Itano, H. Nagamatsu, J. Akiyoshi, J. Kurogi, N. Tajiri, M. Kajiwara, and M. Sata
Temporary Indwelling Catheter System via the Left Brachial Artery: Evaluation in 83 Patients with Hepatic Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 652 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Ishigami, K. Yoshimitsu, H. Irie, T. Tajima, Y. Asayama, M. Hirakawa, and H. Honda
Accessory Left Gastric Artery from Left Hepatic Artery Shown on MDCT and Conventional Angiography: Correlation with CT Hepatic Arteriography
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 1002 - 1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
O. Seror, G. N'Kontchou, D. Haddar, M. Dordea, Y. Ajavon, N. Ganne, J. C. Trinchet, M. Beaugrand, and N. Sellier
Large Infiltrative Hepatocellular Carcinomas: Treatment with Percutaneous Intraarterial Ethanol Injection Alone or in Combination with Conventional Percutaneous Ethanol Injection
Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 299 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Ishigami, Y. Zhang, S. Rayhill, D. Katz, and A. Stolpen
Does Variant Hepatic Artery Anatomy in a Liver Transplant Recipient Increase the Risk of Hepatic Artery Complications After Transplantation?
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1577 - 1584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. M. Covey, L. A. Brody, G. I. Getrajdman, C. T. Sofocleous, and K. T. Brown
Incidence, Patterns, and Clinical Relevance of Variant Portal Vein Anatomy
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2004; 183(4): 1055 - 1064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.