|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Neuroradiology |
1 From the Departments of Neuroradiology (K.K., O.J., K.S.) and Radiation Oncology (T.W.), University of Heidelberg Medical School, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Received June 8, 2001; revision requested July 5; final revision received March 4, 2002; accepted March 25. Address correspondence to K.K. (e-mail: klaus_kirchhof@med.uni-heidelberg.de).
PURPOSE: To compare the visualization of cerebral veins and dural sinuses at contrast materialenhanced three-dimensional (3D) fast low-angle shot (FLASH) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography, and phase-contrast MR angiography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors prospectively compared the two-dimensional source images, multiplanar reconstructed images, and maximum intensity projection angiograms obtained at contrast-enhanced 3D radio-frequencyspoiled FLASH MR angiography in 20 patients with those obtained at TOF and phase-contrast MR angiographic examinations. Two neuroradiologists in consensus determined the number of visualized cortical veins and graded the quality of visualization of veins and sinuses as intense and continuous, faint and continuous, or noncontinuous. Statistical analysis was performed with the nonparametric sign test and the Wilcoxon matched pairs sign rank test.
RESULTS: The cortical veins, inferior sagittal sinus, and cavernous sinuses were visualized best with FLASH MR angiography (P < .003). The Trolard and Labbé veins were visualized equally well with the FLASH and TOF sequences. For septal, internal cerebral, and Rosenthal left basal vein visualization, phase-contrast MR angiography was inferior to the FLASH and TOF MR angiographic examinations (P < .05). The quality of visualization of the thalamostriate and Galen veins and of the superior sagittal, rectal, and transverse sinuses was the same at all MR angiographic examinations.
CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional FLASH MR angiography depicts some venous structures better than do TOF and phase-contrast MR angiographic examinations. The depiction of other veins is the same with 3D FLASH and TOF sequences.
© RSNA, 2002
Index terms: Cerebral blood vessels Cerebral blood vessels, MR, 176.121412, 176.121416, 176.12142, 176.12143 Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies, 176.121412, 176.121416, 176.12142, 176.12143 Magnetic resonance (MR), vascular studies, 176.12142
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Tomasian, N. Salamon, M.S. Krishnam, J.P. Finn, and J.P. Villablanca 3D High-Spatial-Resolution Cerebral MR Venography at 3T: A Contrast-Dose-Reduction Study AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2009; 30(2): 349 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lettau, K. Sartor, S. Heiland, and S. Hahnel 3T High-Spatial-Resolution Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Intracranial Venous System with Parallel Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2009; 30(1): 185 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. H. Hu, N. G. Campeau, J. Huston III, D. G. Kruger, C. R. Haider, and S. J. Riederer High-Spatial-Resolution Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of the Intracranial Venous System with Fourfold Accelerated Two-dimensional Sensitivity Encoding Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 853 - 861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Linn, B. Ertl-Wagner, K.C. Seelos, M. Strupp, M. Reiser, H. Bruckmann, and R. Bruning Diagnostic Value of Multidetector-Row CT Angiography in the Evaluation of Thrombosis of the Cerebral Venous Sinuses AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2007; 28(5): 946 - 952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G. Wustenberg, C. Offergeld, T. Zahnert, K.-B. Huttenbrink, and T. Kittner Extension of Intracranial Thrombosis After Unilateral Dissection of the Internal Jugular Vein Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, May 1, 2005; 131(5): 430 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Mermuys, P. K. Vanhoenacker, P. Chappel, and L. Van Hoe Three-dimensional Venography of the Brain with a Volumetric Interpolated Sequence Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 901 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||