|
|
||||||||
Breast Imaging |
1 From the Susan G. Komen Breast Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (W.P.E., L.L.); the Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (L.J.W.B.); and R2 Technology, Sunnyvale, Calif (K.F.O., R.A.C.). From the 2000 RSNA scientific assembly. Received June 13, 2001; revision requested August 6; final revision received March 15, 2002; accepted March 25. Address correspondence to W.P.E., UT Southwestern Center for Breast Care, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-8585 (e-mail: phil.evans@utsouthwestern.edu).
PURPOSE: To characterize the mammographic appearance of invasive lobular carcinoma in a large series of screening-detected consecutive breast cancers and to evaluate the ability of a computer-aided detection system to mark these carcinomas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Investigators used the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon to characterize lesions as part of a retrospective review of 90 screening mammographic examinations that led to biopsy-proved diagnosis of 94 invasive lobular carcinoma lesions. The 40 available prior mammographic examinations (obtained 924 months earlier) were also reviewed to characterize any visible findings. The results of a computer-aided detection analysis were compared with the images, and the sensitivity of the algorithm was calculated for correct detection of the lesions.
RESULTS: Fifty-six (60%) of 94 lesions manifested as masses, of which 40 (71%) were described as irregular and spiculated; 20 (21%) of 94, as architectural distortions; and the remainder, 18 (20%), as either asymmetric densities or calcifications. On the screening mammograms showing biopsy-proved cancers, the sensitivity of the computer-aided detection system was 86 (91%) of 94 lesions. Thirty-one of the 40 prior mammograms showed retrospectively visible findings, and 24 (77%) of 31 were marked by the computer-aided detection system.
CONCLUSION: Spiculated masses and architectural distortions are the predominant appearances of invasive lobular carcinoma, and a computer-aided detection system correctly marked a high percentage of invasive lobular carcinoma lesions.
© RSNA, 2002
Index terms: Breast neoplasms, diagnosis, 00.111, 00.1299 Breast neoplasms, radiography, 00.111 Breast radiography, 00.111 Computers, diagnostic aid
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. S. The, K. J. Schilling, J. W. Hoffmeister, E. Friedmann, R. McGinnis, and R. G. Holcomb Detection of Breast Cancer with Full-Field Digital Mammography and Computer-Aided Detection Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2009; 192(2): 337 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S GARNETT, M WALLIS, and G MORGAN Do screen-detected lobular and ductal carcinoma present with different mammographic features? Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2009; 82(973): 20 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Lopez and L. W. Bassett Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: Spectrum of Mammographic, US, and MR Imaging Findings RadioGraphics, January 1, 2009; 29(1): 165 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Biglia, L. Mariani, L. Sgro, P. Mininanni, G. Moggio, and P. Sismondi Increased incidence of lobular breast cancer in women treated with hormone replacement therapy: implications for diagnosis, surgical and medical treatment Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2007; 14(3): 549 - 567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Yang, W. K. Moon, N. Cho, J. S. Park, J. H. Cha, S. M. Kim, S. J. Kim, and J.-G. Im Screening Mammography-detected Cancers: Sensitivity of a Computer-aided Detection System Applied to Full-Field Digital Mammograms Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 104 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Harvey Unusual Breast Cancers: Useful Clues to Expanding the Differential Diagnosis Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 683 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. R. Pai, N. E. Gregory, A. E. Swinford, and M. Rebner Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Computer-aided Detection in Screening Mammography Radiology, December 1, 2006; 241(3): 689 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Dean and C. C. Ilvento Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 20 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Morton, D. H. Whaley, K. R. Brandt, and K. K. Amrami Screening Mammograms: Interpretation with Computer-aided Detection--Prospective Evaluation Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 375 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Baker, J. Y. Lo, D. M. Delong, and C. E. Floyd Computer-aided Detection in Screening Mammography: Variability in Cues Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 411 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Baker, E. L. Rosen, J. Y. Lo, E. I. Gimenez, R. Walsh, and M. S. Soo Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) in Screening Mammography: Sensitivity of Commercial CAD Systems for Detecting Architectural Distortion Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2003; 181(4): 1083 - 1088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||