Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 30, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2251010242
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2251010242v1
225/1/91    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tublin, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kliewer, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tublin, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kliewer, M. A.
(Radiology 2002;225:91-96.)
© RSNA, 2002


Experimental Studies

Conspicuity of Renal Calculi at Unenhanced CT: Effects of Calculus Composition and Size and CT Technique1

Mitchell E. Tublin, MD, Michael E. Murphy, PhD, David M. Delong, MD, Franklin N. Tessler, MD and Mark A. Kliewer, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Albany Medical College, NY (M.E.T., M.E.M., F.N.T.); and Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.E.M., D.M.D., M.A.K.). Received January 2, 2001; revision requested February 16; final revision received February 26, 2002; accepted March 25. Address correspondence to M.E.T., Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (e-mail: tublinme@msx.upmc.edu).

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of calculus size, composition, and technique (kilovolt and milliampere settings) on the conspicuity of renal calculi at unenhanced helical computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors performed unenhanced CT of a phantom containing 188 renal calculi of varying size and chemical composition (brushite, cystine, struvite, weddellite, whewellite, and uric acid) at 24 combinations of four kilovolt (80–140 kV) and six milliampere (200–300 mA) levels. Two radiologists, who were unaware of the location and number of calculi, reviewed the CT images and recorded where stones were detected. These observations were compared with the known positions of calculi to generate true-positive and false-positive rates. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the effects of stone size, composition, and technique and to generate probability estimates of detection. Interobserver agreement was estimated with {kappa} statistics.

RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was high: the mean {kappa} value for the two observers was 0.86. The conspicuity of stone fragments increased with increasing kilovolt and milliampere levels for all stone types. At the highest settings (140 kV and 300 mA), the detection threshold size (ie, the size of calculus that had a 50% probability of being detected) ranged from 0.81 mm + 0.03 (weddellite) to 1.3 mm + 0.1 (uric acid). Detection threshold size for each type of calculus increased up to 1.17-fold at lower kilovolt settings and up to 1.08-fold at lower milliampere settings.

CONCLUSION: The conspicuity of small renal calculi at CT increases with higher kilovolt and milliampere settings, with higher kilovolts being particularly important. Small uric acid calculi may be imperceptible, even with maximal CT technique.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), experimental studies, 81.12111, 81.12115 • Experimental study • Kidney, calculi, 81.811 • Phantoms




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. K. Paulson, C. Weaver, L. M. Ho, L. Martin, J. Li, J. Darsie, and D. P. Frush
Conventional and Reduced Radiation Dose of 16-MDCT for Detection of Nephrolithiasis and Ureterolithiasis
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 151 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. C. Chan, B. N. Joe, F. V. Coakley, E. L. Prien Jr, R. G. Gould, S. Prevrhal, W. C. Barber, K. S. Kirkwood, A. Qayyum, and B. M. Yeh
Gallstone Detection at CT in Vitro: Effect of Peak Voltage Setting.
Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 546 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.