Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 24, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2253011413
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2253011413v1
225/3/730    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baur, A.
Right arrow Articles by Reiser, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baur, A.
Right arrow Articles by Reiser, M.
(Radiology 2002;225:730-735.)
© RSNA, 2002


Musculoskeletal Imaging

Acute Osteoporotic and Neoplastic Vertebral Compression Fractures: Fluid Sign at MR Imaging1

Andrea Baur, MD, Axel Stäbler, MD, Susanne Arbogast, MD, Hans Roland Duerr, MD, Reiner Bartl, MD and Maximilian Reiser, MD

1 From the Departments of Clinical Radiology (A.B., A.S., M.R.), Pathology (S.A.), Orthopedic Surgery (H.R.D.), and Internal Medicine (R.B.), University of Munich–Grosshadern, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany. Received August 20, 2001; revision requested September 24; final revision received April 29, 2002; accepted May 16. Address correspondence to A.B. (e-mail: andrea.baur@ikra.med.uni-muenchen.de).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the occurrence, location, and shape of the fluid sign in acute osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral compression fractures at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group comprised 87 consecutive patients with acute vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporotic (n = 52) or neoplastic (n = 35) infiltration. The MR imaging protocol included nonenhanced T1-weighted spin-echo and short inversion time inversion-recovery sequences and a 1.5-T system. Readers blinded to the outcome documented the occurrence, shape, and location of the fluid sign with consensus. The fluid sign was correlated with the cause, age, and severity of the fracture. The diagnosis was confirmed with surgery, follow-up MR imaging, clinical follow-up, or unequivocal imaging findings. Wilcoxon and {chi}2 tests were used to assess significance.

RESULTS: In fractured vertebral bodies, the fluid sign was adjacent to the fractured end plates and exhibited signal intensity isointense to that of cerebrospinal fluid. The fluid sign was linear (n = 16), triangular (n = 5), or focal (n = 2) and was significantly associated with osteoporotic fractures (21 [40%] of 52; P < .001). The fluid sign occurred in two (6%) of 35 neoplastic compression fractures. Histologic examination demonstrated osteonecrosis, edema, and fibrosis at the site of the fluid sign. There was a tendency toward older fractures exhibiting the fluid sign, but this relationship was not significant (P > .05). In osteoporotic fractures, the fluid sign was significantly associated with fracture severity (P < .05).

CONCLUSION: The fluid sign is featured in acute vertebral compression fractures that show bone marrow edema. It can be an additional sign of osteoporosis and rarely occurs in metastatic fractures.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Osteoporosis, 30.56 • Spine, fractures, 30.411 • Spine, MR, 30.121411, 30.121413 • Spine, secondary neoplasms, 30.33




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. C. Wiggins, M. Sehizadeh, T. K. Pilgram, and L. A. Gilula
Importance of Intravertebral Fracture Clefts in Vertebroplasty Outcome
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 634 - 640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C.-W. Yu, C.-Y. Hsu, T.T.-F. Shih, B.-B. Chen, and C.-J. Fu
Vertebral Osteonecrosis: MR Imaging Findings and Related Changes on Adjacent Levels
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 42 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.T. Trout, D.F. Kallmes, and T.J. Kaufmann
New Fractures after Vertebroplasty: Adjacent Fractures Occur Significantly Sooner
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 217 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
J Teh, A Imam, and C Watts
Imaging of back pain
Imaging, December 1, 2005; 17(3): 171 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. C. Zajick Jr, W. B. Morrison, M. E. Schweitzer, J. A. Parellada, and J. A. Carrino
Benign and Malignant Processes: Normal Values and Differentiation with Chemical Shift MR Imaging in Vertebral Marrow
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 590 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. M. Fayad, S. Kawamoto, I. R. Kamel, D. A. Bluemke, J. Eng, F. J. Frassica, and E. K. Fishman
Distinction of Long Bone Stress Fractures from Pathologic Fractures on Cross-Sectional Imaging: How Successful Are We?
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 915 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Castillo
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Spine: Is It Reliable?
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2003; 24(6): 1251 - 1253.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. T. C. Yuh, N. A. Mayr, K. Petropoulou, and D. P. Beall
MR Fluid Sign in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture [letter]
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 904 - 904.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.