Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 24, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2253011515
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2253011515v1
225/3/783    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McTavish, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McTavish, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, S. G.
(Radiology 2002;225:783-790.)
© RSNA, 2002


Genitourinary Imaging

Multi–Detector Row CT Urography: Comparison of Strategies for Depicting the Normal Urinary Collecting System1

Jeffrey D. McTavish, MD, Masahiro Jinzaki, MD, Kelly H. Zou, PhD, Richard D. Nawfel, MS and Stuart G. Silverman, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (J.D.M., M.J., K.H.Z., R.D.N., S.G.S.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan (M.J.); and Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (K.H.Z.). From the 2000 RSNA scientific assembly. Received September 14, 2001; revision requested November 12; final revision received April 26, 2002; accepted May 22. Address correspondence to S.G.S. (e-mail: sgsilverman@partners.org).

PURPOSE: To evaluate several protocols for depiction of the urinary collecting system with multi–detector row computed tomographic (CT) urography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients with hematuria or a suspicious renal mass underwent CT urography, during which thinly collimated (1-mm) pyelographic phase scanning was performed 8–10 minutes after contrast medium administration. Patients were examined while prone only (n = 17) and while both prone and supine (n = 17) after a 250-mL infusion of normal saline. Each collecting system and ureter was divided into six segments that were assigned opacification scores. All acquisition techniques were compared, and the highest-scoring technique was compared with that in 17 patients who underwent conventional intravenous urography (IVU). Three reconstruction techniques (transverse, coronal, and maximal intensity projection) were also compared. Stratified analysis was performed with the paired two-tailed Student t test to compare opacification scores for both the acquisition techniques and display methods, both individually and in all possible combinations.

RESULTS: CT urography with supplemental saline administration, performed with the patient prone or supine, significantly improved mean opacification scores in the distal ureters (right, P = .004; left, P = .006). With this technique, CT urography produced a mean opacification score that was not significantly different from that with IVU in 11 of 12 segments and was significantly better than that with IVU in one of 12 segments (lower left ureter). Mean opacification scores obtained with transverse or coronal displays were equal to or higher than those obtained with maximum intensity projection reconstructions in all segments.

CONCLUSION: CT urography with a multi–detector row scanner and supplemental infusion of normal saline reliably displays the opacified urinary collecting system.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), image display and recording, 80.12111, 80.12112, 80.12114, 80.12117 • Computed tomography (CT), thin-section, 80.12118 • Genitourinary system, CT, 80.12111, 80.12112, 80.12114, 80.12117 • Urography, 80.1221




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. J. Vrtiska, R. P. Hartman, J. M. Kofler, M. R. Bruesewitz, B. F. King, and C. H. McCollough
Spatial Resolution and Radiation Dose of a 64-MDCT Scanner Compared with Published CT Urography Protocols
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2009; 192(4): 941 - 948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Silverman, J. R. Leyendecker, and E. S. Amis Jr
What Is the Current Role of CT Urography and MR Urography in the Evaluation of the Urinary Tract?
Radiology, February 1, 2009; 250(2): 309 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Kawamoto, K. M. Horton, and E. K. Fishman
Transitional Cell Neoplasm of the Upper Urinary Tract: Evaluation with MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 416 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Kim, L. L. Wang, J. P. Heiken, C. L. Siegel, C. F. Hildebolt, and K. T. Bae
Opacification of Urinary Bladder and Ureter at CT Urography: Effect of a Log-rolling Procedure and Postvoiding Residual Bladder Urine Volume
Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 747 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
J Richenberg
Haematuria
Imaging, March 1, 2008; 20(1): 57 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. C. Chow, S. W. Kwan, E. W. Olcott, and G. Sommer
Split-Bolus MDCT Urography with Synchronous Nephrographic and Excretory Phase Enhancement
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): 314 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Jinzaki, A. Tanimoto, H. Shinmoto, Y. Horiguchi, K. Sato, S. Kuribayashi, and S. G. Silverman
Detection of Bladder Tumors with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 913 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Silverman, S. A. Akbar, K. J. Mortele, K. Tuncali, J. G. Bhagwat, and J. L. Seifter
Multi-Detector Row CT Urography of Normal Urinary Collecting System: Furosemide versus Saline as Adjunct to Contrast Medium
Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 749 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
A S Lowe and C L Kay
Recent developments in CT: a review of the clinical applications and advantages of multidetector computed tomography
Imaging, June 1, 2006; 18(2): 62 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. S. Sudakoff, D. P. Dunn, R. S. Hellman, M. A. Laguna, C. R. Wilson, R. W. Prost, D. C. Eastwood, and H. J. Lim
Opacification of the Genitourinary Collecting System During MDCT Urography with Enhanced CT Digital Radiography: Nonsaline Versus Saline Bolus
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 122 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Kawamoto, K. M. Horton, and E. K. Fishman
Opacification of the Collecting System and Ureters on Excretory-Phase CT Using Oral Water as Contrast Medium
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 136 - 140.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. Liu, K. J. Mortele, and S. G. Silverman
Incidental Extraurinary Findings at MDCT Urography in Patients with Hematuria: Prevalence and Impact on Imaging Costs
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 1051 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
J Richenberg and P Thompson
Haematuria
Imaging, August 1, 2005; 17(1): 34 - 43.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. M. Caoili, P. Inampudi, R. H. Cohan, and J. H. Ellis
Optimization of Multi-Detector Row CT Urography: Effect of Compression, Saline Administration, and Prolongation of Acquisition Delay
Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 116 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. S. Sudakoff, M. Guralnick, P. Langenstroer, W. D. Foley, K. L. Cihlar, J. S. Shakespear, and W. A. See
CT Urography of Urinary Diversions with Enhanced CT Digital Radiography: Preliminary Experience
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 131 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M Noroozian, R H Cohan, E M Caoili, N C Cowan, and J H Ellis
Multislice CT urography: state of the art
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2004; 77(suppl_1): S74 - S86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. Kawashima, T. J. Vrtiska, A. J. LeRoy, R. P. Hartman, C. H. McCollough, and B. F. King Jr
CT Urography
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S35 - S54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. M. Caoili, R. H. Cohan, A. Kawashima, and A. J. LeRoy
Invited Commentary * Authors' Response
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S55 - S58.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. D. Nawfel, P. F. Judy, A. R. Schleipman, and S. G. Silverman
Patient Radiation Dose at CT Urography and Conventional Urography
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 126 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. A. Joffe, S. Servaes, S. Okon, and M. Horowitz
Multi-Detector Row CT Urography in the Evaluation of Hematuria
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1441 - 1455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]