Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print November 21, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2261012108
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2261012108v1
226/1/138    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kitagawa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Takeda, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kitagawa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Takeda, K.
(Radiology 2003;226:138-144.)
© RSNA, 2002


Cardiac Imaging

Acute Myocardial Infarction: Myocardial Viability Assessment in Patients Early Thereafter—Comparison of Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging with Resting 201Tl SPECT1

Kakuya Kitagawa, MD, Hajime Sakuma, MD, Tadanori Hirano, MD, Shinya Okamoto, MD, Katsutoshi Makino, MD and Kan Takeda, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (K.K., T.H.) and Internal Medicine (S.O., K.M.), Matsusaka Central Hospital, Mie, Japan; and Department of Radiology, Mie University School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie 514-8507, Japan (K.K., H.S., K.T.). From the 2001 RSNA scientific assembly. Received December 28, 2001; revision requested February 28, 2002; revision received April 18; accepted June 28. Address correspondence to K.K. (e-mail: kakuya@clin.medic.mie-u.ac.jp).

PURPOSE: To compare contrast material–enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with resting thallium 201 (201Tl) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for predicting myocardial viability in patients early after acute myocardial infarction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inversion-recovery contrast-enhanced MR images and resting 201Tl SPECT images were obtained in 22 patients after acute myocardial infarction. The 201Tl SPECT images were obtained 4.3 days ± 0.2 (standard error) after the onset of myocardial infarction. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging was performed 7.9 days ± 1.6 after 201Tl SPECT. Transmural extent of hyperenhancement on contrast-enhanced MR images and regional 201Tl activity were quantitatively analyzed with a 12-segment model. Regional wall thickening on follow-up cine MR images obtained 67 days ± 17 after contrast-enhanced MR imaging was used as an index for myocardial viability. Statistical analyses were performed with the {chi}2 and two-tailed Student t tests.

RESULTS: Both contrast-enhanced MR and resting 201Tl SPECT images showed significant correlations with regional wall thickening on follow-up cine MR images. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the prediction of viable myocardium were significantly higher than those of resting 201Tl SPECT (98.0% vs 90.3%, P < .01; 75.0% vs 54.4%, P < .05; and 92.0% vs 81.1%, P < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging can help predict myocardial viability as seen on follow-up cine MR images after acute myocardial infarction, with significantly improved sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in comparison with those of resting 201Tl SPECT.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Heart, function • Heart, MR, 511.121413, 511.12143 • Heart, SPECT, 511.12162 • Myocardium, infarction, 511.771




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. C. M. van den Bosch, J. J. M. Westenberg, J. C. Post, G. Yo, J. Verwoerd, L. J. M. Kroft, and A. de Roos
Free-Breathing MRI for the Assessment of Myocardial Infarction: Clinical Validation
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2009; 192(6): W277 - W281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. A. White, R. Yee, X. Yuan, A. Krahn, A. Skanes, M. Parker, G. Klein, and M. Drangova
Delayed Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Intraventricular Dyssynchrony
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 1953 - 1960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. J. Pennell, U. P. Sechtem, C. B. Higgins, W. J. Manning, G. M. Pohost, F. E. Rademakers, A. C. van Rossum, L. J. Shaw, and E. K. Yucel
Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2004; 25(21): 1940 - 1965.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Gibbons, U. S. Valeti, P. A. Araoz, and A. S. Jaffe
The quantification of infarct size
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 19, 2004; 44(8): 1533 - 1542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Saeed, R. Lee, A. Martin, O. Weber, G. A. Krombach, S. Schalla, M. Lee, D. Saloner, and C. B. Higgins
Transendocardial Delivery of Extracellular Myocardial Markers by Using Combination X-ray/MR Fluoroscopic Guidance: Feasibility Study in Dogs
Radiology, June 1, 2004; 231(3): 689 - 696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]