|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Experimental Studies |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Osaka University Medical School, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan (T.K., T.J., S.H., H. Naito, N.T., M. Koyama, N.M., O.H., H. Nakamura); and GE Yokogawa Medical Systems, Hino, Japan (M. Kudo). Received January 29, 2001; revision requested March 21; final revision received March 21, 2002; accepted April 30. Address correspondence to T.K. (e-mail: koz@radiol.med.osaka-u.ac.jp).
PURPOSE: To determine the effect of changing pitch and collimation on depiction of pulmonary metastases on scans of 5-mm section thickness obtained with multidetector row computed tomography (CT) compared with those obtained with singledetector row CT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five autopsy lungs, 1,013 metastatic 0.530.0-mm nodules were detected at helical CT with 1-mm collimation and histopathologically diagnosed as metastases. Each nodule was numbered, and its localization was recorded as the standard for subsequent studies. Four types of scans of 5-mm section thickness were obtained with multidetector row CT and four sets of helical pitch and table speed, respectively, as follows: set A, 3:1 and 7.5 mm per rotation; set B, 6:1 and 15 mm per rotation; set C, 6:1 and 30 mm per rotation; set D, conventional and 5-mm interval. Conventional helical CT scans (set E) were obtained with 5-mm collimation at singledetector row CT. Two independent observers evaluated the five sets of CT scans.
RESULTS: Acquisition times for sets AD, respectively, were 1.9, 3.8, 7.5, and 1.5 times faster than they were for set E. The mean numbers of detected nodules were 671 (66%) in set A, 661 (65%) in set B, 678 (67%) in set C, 654 (65%) in set D, and 656 (65%) in set E; there was no significant difference in the number of detected nodules among the five sets (P = .997, McNemar test and Bonferroni equation).
CONCLUSION: Regardless of varying pitch or detector collimation, multi and singledetector row CT scans obtained with 5-mm section thickness have almost the same ability to depict pulmonary metastases and are equivalent.
© RSNA, 2002
Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), helical, 60.12115 Computed tomography (CT), multidetector row, 60.12119 Experimental study Lung, nodule, 60.332, 60.333 Lung neoplasms, metastases, 60.33
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Parsons, E. K. Ennis, B. C. Yankaskas, L. A. Parker Jr, W. B. Hyslop, and F. C. Detterbeck Helical Computed Tomography Inaccuracy in the Detection of Pulmonary Metastases: Can It Be Improved? Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2007; 84(6): 1830 - 1836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Peloschek, J. Sailer, M. Weber, C. J. Herold, M. Prokop, and C. Schaefer-Prokop Pulmonary Nodules: Sensitivity of Maximum Intensity Projection versus That of Volume Rendering of 3D Multidetector CT Data Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 561 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||