Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print November 21, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2261011893
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2261011893v1
226/1/53    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liem, Y. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hunink, M.G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liem, Y. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hunink, M.G. M.
(Radiology 2003;226:53-62.)
© RSNA, 2002


Evidence-based Practice

Living Renal Donors: Optimizing the Imaging Strategy—Decision- and Cost-effectiveness Analysis1

Ylian S. Liem, MSc, Marc C. J. M. Kock, MD, Jan N. M. Ijzermans, MD, PhD, Willem Weimar, MD, PhD, Karen Visser, PhD and M.G. Myriam Hunink, MD, PhD

1 From the Program for the Assessment of Radiological Technology (ART Program) and the Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Y.S.L., M.C.J.M.K., K.V., M.G.M.H.), Radiology (Y.S.L., M.C.J.M.K., K.V., M.G.M.H.), Surgery (J.N.M.I.), and Internal Medicine (W.W.), Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rm EE21-40a, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, the Netherlands; and Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (M.G.M.H.). From the 2001 RSNA scientific assembly. Received November 26, 2001; revision requested February 7, 2002; revision received March 21; accepted May 13. Supported in part by the Foundation for Health Care Efficiency Research and by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. Address correspondence to M.G.M.H. (e-mail: hunink@epib.fgg.eur.nl).

PURPOSE: To determine the most cost-effective strategy for preoperative imaging performed in potential living renal donors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a decision-analytic model, the societal cost-effectiveness of digital subtraction angiography (DSA), gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, contrast material–enhanced spiral computed tomographic (CT) angiography, and combinations of these imaging techniques was evaluated. Outcome measures included lifetime cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. A base-case analysis was performed with a 40-year-old female donor and a 40-year-old female recipient.

RESULTS: For the donor, MR angiography (24.05 QALYs and $9,000) dominated all strategies except for MR angiography with CT angiography, which had an incremental ratio of $245,000 per QALY. For the recipient, DSA and DSA with MR angiography yielded similar results (10.46 QALYs and $179,000) and dominated all other strategies. When results for donor and recipient were combined, DSA dominated all other strategies (34.51 QALYs and $188,000). If DSA was associated with a 99% specificity or less for detection of renal disease, MR angiography with CT angiography was superior (34.47 QALYs and $190,000).

CONCLUSION: For preoperative imaging in a potential renal donor, DSA is the most cost-effective strategy if it has a specificity greater than 99% for detection of renal disease; otherwise, MR angiography with CT angiography is the most cost-effective strategy.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies, 81.12115 • Cost-effectiveness • Digital subtraction angiography, comparative studies, 81.124 • Kidney, transplantation, 81.455 • Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies, 81.12142, 81.12143




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. Rastogi, D. V. Sahani, M. A. Blake, D. C. Ko, and P. R. Mueller
Evaluation of Living Renal Donors: Accuracy of Three-dimensional 16-Section CT
Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 136 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. C. J. M. Kock, J. N. M. Ijzermans, K. Visser, S. M. Hussain, W. Weimar, P. M. T. Pattynama, G. P. Krestin, and M. G. M. Hunink
Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography in Living Renal Donors: Diagnostic Agreement, Impact on Decision Making, and Costs
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 448 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. M. Hussain, M. C. J. M. Kock, J. N. M. IJzermans, P. M. T. Pattynama, M. G. Myriam Hunink, and G. P. Krestin
MR Imaging: A "One-Stop Shop" Modality for Preoperative Evaluation of Potential Living Kidney Donors
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2003; 23(2): 505 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]