|
|
||||||||
Genitourinary Imaging |
1 From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (M.R.O.) and Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine (J.S.J.), Kuopio University Hospital, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210 Kuopio, Finland; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (P.P.K.). Received August 29, 2001; revision requested October 17; final revision received May 20, 2002; accepted June 18. Supported by the Finnish Cultural Foundation and the Research Foundations of Orion Corporation and Instrumentarium. Address correspondence to M.R.O. (e-mail: maija-riitta.orden@kuh.fi).
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of a microbubble contrast agent on the power Doppler ultrasonographic (US) examination of adnexal tumors, with a special focus on the timing of the transit of the microbubble bolus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy patients who were suspected of having ovarian tumors were examined preoperatively with contrast materialenhanced US. Images obtained during a 5-minute examination were stored digitally, and the behavior of the contrast agent was evaluated objectively with measurement of the time-dependent image intensity at the region of interest with a computer program. A time-intensity curve in each case was derived and analyzed. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare intensity changes and tumor parameters in benign and malignant adnexal tumors.
RESULTS: Both the baseline and maximum power Doppler intensities, as well as the absolute and relative (percent) rise in intensity, were significantly higher (P < .001) in malignant as compared with benign tumors. The arrival time was shorter (17.5 vs 22.5 seconds; P = .005) and the duration of contrast agent effect was longer (190.4 vs 103.6 seconds; P < .001) in malignant tumors than they were in benign tumors. The area under the time-intensity curve was significantly greater in malignant tumors compared with that in benign tumors (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: After microbubble contrast agent injection, malignant and benign adnexal lesions behave differently in degree, onset, and duration of Doppler US enhancement.
© RSNA, 2003
Index terms: Ovary, neoplasms, 852.31, 852.32 Ovary, US, 852.12988 Ultrasound (US), contrast media, 852.12988 Ultrasound (US), Doppler studies, 852.12988
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. C. Fleischer, A. Lyshchik, H. W. Jones Jr, M. Crispens, M. Loveless, R. F. Andreotti, P. K. Williams, and D. A. Fishman Contrast-Enhanced Transvaginal Sonography of Benign Versus Malignant Ovarian Masses: Preliminary Findings J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2008; 27(7): 1011 - 1018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Barua, J. S. Abramowicz, J. M. Bahr, P. Bitterman, A. Dirks, K. A. Holub, E. Sheiner, M. J. Bradaric, S. L. Edassery, and J. L. Luborsky Detection of Ovarian Tumors in Chicken by Sonography: A Step Toward Early Diagnosis in Humans? J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2007; 26(7): 909 - 919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. T. Rissanen, P. Korpisalo, J. E. Markkanen, T. Liimatainen, M.-R. Orden, I. Kholova, A. de Goede, T. Heikura, O. H. Grohn, and S. Yla-Herttuala Blood Flow Remodels Growing Vasculature During Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Therapy and Determines Between Capillary Arterialization and Sprouting Angiogenesis Circulation, December 20, 2005; 112(25): 3937 - 3946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Testa, G. Ferrandina, E. Fruscella, C. Van Holsbeke, E. Ferrazzi, F. P. G. Leone, D. Arduini, C. Exacoustos, D. Bokor, G. Scambia, et al. The Use of Contrasted Transvaginal Sonography in the Diagnosis of Gynecologic Diseases: A Preliminary Study J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2005; 24(9): 1267 - 1278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Abramowicz Ultrasonographic Contrast Media: Has the Time Come in Obstetrics and Gynecology? J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2005; 24(4): 517 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Marret, S. Sauget, B. Giraudeau, M. Brewer, J. Ranger-Moore, G. Body, and F. Tranquart Contrast-Enhanced Sonography Helps in Discrimination of Benign From Malignant Adnexal Masses J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2004; 23(12): 1629 - 1639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Fleischer, K. J. Niermann, E. F. Donnelly, T. E. Yankeelov, K. M. Canniff, D. E. Hallahan, and M. E. Rothenberg Sonographic Depiction of Microvessel Perfusion: Principles and Potential J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2004; 23(11): 1499 - 1506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D Cosgrove Angiogenesis imaging - ultrasound Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2003; 76(suppl_1): S43 - S49. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||