Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print December 20, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2262011450
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2262011450v1
226/2/405    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ordén, M.-R.
Right arrow Articles by Kirkinen, P. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ordén, M.-R.
Right arrow Articles by Kirkinen, P. P.
(Radiology 2003;226:405-410.)
© RSNA, 2003


Genitourinary Imaging

Kinetics of a US Contrast Agent in Benign and Malignant Adnexal Tumors1

Maija-Riitta Ordén, MD, PhD, Jukka S. Jurvelin, PhD and Pertti P. Kirkinen, MD, PhD

1 From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (M.R.O.) and Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine (J.S.J.), Kuopio University Hospital, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210 Kuopio, Finland; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (P.P.K.). Received August 29, 2001; revision requested October 17; final revision received May 20, 2002; accepted June 18. Supported by the Finnish Cultural Foundation and the Research Foundations of Orion Corporation and Instrumentarium. Address correspondence to M.R.O. (e-mail: maija-riitta.orden@kuh.fi).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of a microbubble contrast agent on the power Doppler ultrasonographic (US) examination of adnexal tumors, with a special focus on the timing of the transit of the microbubble bolus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy patients who were suspected of having ovarian tumors were examined preoperatively with contrast material–enhanced US. Images obtained during a 5-minute examination were stored digitally, and the behavior of the contrast agent was evaluated objectively with measurement of the time-dependent image intensity at the region of interest with a computer program. A time-intensity curve in each case was derived and analyzed. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare intensity changes and tumor parameters in benign and malignant adnexal tumors.

RESULTS: Both the baseline and maximum power Doppler intensities, as well as the absolute and relative (percent) rise in intensity, were significantly higher (P < .001) in malignant as compared with benign tumors. The arrival time was shorter (17.5 vs 22.5 seconds; P = .005) and the duration of contrast agent effect was longer (190.4 vs 103.6 seconds; P < .001) in malignant tumors than they were in benign tumors. The area under the time-intensity curve was significantly greater in malignant tumors compared with that in benign tumors (P < .001).

CONCLUSION: After microbubble contrast agent injection, malignant and benign adnexal lesions behave differently in degree, onset, and duration of Doppler US enhancement.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Ovary, neoplasms, 852.31, 852.32 • Ovary, US, 852.12988 • Ultrasound (US), contrast media, 852.12988 • Ultrasound (US), Doppler studies, 852.12988




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
A. C. Fleischer, A. Lyshchik, H. W. Jones Jr, M. Crispens, M. Loveless, R. F. Andreotti, P. K. Williams, and D. A. Fishman
Contrast-Enhanced Transvaginal Sonography of Benign Versus Malignant Ovarian Masses: Preliminary Findings
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2008; 27(7): 1011 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
A. Barua, J. S. Abramowicz, J. M. Bahr, P. Bitterman, A. Dirks, K. A. Holub, E. Sheiner, M. J. Bradaric, S. L. Edassery, and J. L. Luborsky
Detection of Ovarian Tumors in Chicken by Sonography: A Step Toward Early Diagnosis in Humans?
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2007; 26(7): 909 - 919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. T. Rissanen, P. Korpisalo, J. E. Markkanen, T. Liimatainen, M.-R. Orden, I. Kholova, A. de Goede, T. Heikura, O. H. Grohn, and S. Yla-Herttuala
Blood Flow Remodels Growing Vasculature During Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Therapy and Determines Between Capillary Arterialization and Sprouting Angiogenesis
Circulation, December 20, 2005; 112(25): 3937 - 3946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
A. C. Testa, G. Ferrandina, E. Fruscella, C. Van Holsbeke, E. Ferrazzi, F. P. G. Leone, D. Arduini, C. Exacoustos, D. Bokor, G. Scambia, et al.
The Use of Contrasted Transvaginal Sonography in the Diagnosis of Gynecologic Diseases: A Preliminary Study
J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2005; 24(9): 1267 - 1278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. S. Abramowicz
Ultrasonographic Contrast Media: Has the Time Come in Obstetrics and Gynecology?
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2005; 24(4): 517 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
H. Marret, S. Sauget, B. Giraudeau, M. Brewer, J. Ranger-Moore, G. Body, and F. Tranquart
Contrast-Enhanced Sonography Helps in Discrimination of Benign From Malignant Adnexal Masses
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2004; 23(12): 1629 - 1639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
A. C. Fleischer, K. J. Niermann, E. F. Donnelly, T. E. Yankeelov, K. M. Canniff, D. E. Hallahan, and M. E. Rothenberg
Sonographic Depiction of Microvessel Perfusion: Principles and Potential
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2004; 23(11): 1499 - 1506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D Cosgrove
Angiogenesis imaging - ultrasound
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2003; 76(suppl_1): S43 - S49.
[Full Text] [PDF]