Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print January 24, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2263011473
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2263011473v1
226/3/739    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lim, T.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lim, T.-H.
(Radiology 2003;226:739-747.)
© RSNA, 2003


Experimental Studies

MR Imaging of Reperfused Myocardial Infarction: Comparison of Necrosis-Specific and Intravascular Contrast Agents in a Cat Model1

Seung Soo Lee, MD, Hyun Woo Goo, MD, Sung Bin Park, MD, Chung Hwan Lim, RT, Gyungyub Gong, MD, Joon Beom Seo, MD and Tae-Hwan Lim, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (S.S.L., H.W.G., S.B.P., J.B.S., T.H.L.) and Diagnostic Pathology (G.G.), Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Poongnap-Dong, Songpa-Ku, Seoul 138-736, Korea; and Department of Radiology, Hanseo University, Seosan, Korea (C.H.L.). Received September 4, 2001; revision requested November 7; final revision received June 3, 2002; accepted July 16. Supported by a research grant (HMP-98-G-1-028) from the Korean Health and Welfare Ministry. Address correspondence to T.H.L. (e-mail: thlim@www.amc.seoul.kr).

PURPOSE: To compare T2-weighted and Gadomer-17– and bis-gadolinium mesoporphyrins–enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) images for distinguishing reversibly from irreversibly damaged myocardium in a cat model of reperfused myocardial infarction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve cats underwent 90 minutes of occlusion and 90 minutes of reperfusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery. After baseline T1- and T2-weighted MR images were obtained, Gadomer-17–enhanced and bis-gadolinium mesoporphyrins–enhanced T1-weighted images were sequentially obtained for 6 hours and 2 hours, respectively. After MR imaging, all cats were sacrificed for 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) histochemical tissue staining. Areas of abnormal signal intensity on T2-weighted and Gadomer-17–enhanced and bis-gadolinium mesoporphyrins–enhanced T1-weighted MR images were compared with the areas of infarction seen at TTC histochemical staining by using repeated-measures two-way analysis of variance, linear regression analysis, and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS: Mean areas of abnormally high signal intensity on T2-weighted and Gadomer-17–enhanced T1-weighted MR images (43.9% of the left ventricular surface area ± 11.9 [SD] and 37.7% ± 10.1, respectively) were significantly larger than the mean area of myocardial infarction at TTC staining (25.7% ± 12.5) (P < .001). However, there was excellent correlation between the size of an enhancing area on bis-gadolinium mesoporphyrins–enhanced T1-weighted MR images and that of myocardial infarction at TTC staining (r = 0.916, P < .001).

CONCLUSION: bis-Gadolinium mesoporphyrins–enhanced T1-weighted MR images accurately reflect the area of infarction, whereas the size of infarction is overestimated on T2-weighted and Gadomer-17–enhanced T1-weighted MR images, which seem to depict the periinfarct area as well as the infarct area.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Animals • Contrast media, experimental studies • Magnetic resonance (MR), contrast media • Myocardium, infarction, 511.771 • Myocardium, MR, 511.12143




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. G. Friedrich, H. Abdel-Aty, A. Taylor, J. Schulz-Menger, D. Messroghli, and R. Dietz
The salvaged area at risk in reperfused acute myocardial infarction as visualized by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 22, 2008; 51(16): 1581 - 1587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Dewey, M. Laule, M. Taupitz, N. Kaufels, B. Hamm, and D. Kivelitz
Myocardial Viability: Assessment with Three-dimensional MR Imaging in Pigs and Patients
Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 703 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. C. Lauenstein, W. Ajaj, B. Narin, S. C. Gohde, K. Kroger, J. F. Debatin, and S. G. Ruhm
MR Imaging of Apparent Small-Bowel Perfusion for Diagnosing Mesenteric Ischemia: Feasibility Study
Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 569 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. R. Edelman
Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of the Heart: Overview of the Literature
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 653 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Ni, S. Dymarkowski, F. Chen, J. Bogaert, G. Marchal, T.-H. Lim, and S. S. Lee
Proper Handling of Research with Invalid Conclusions [letter] * Drs Lim and Lee respond:
Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 608 - 610.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.