|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vascular and Interventional Radiology |
1 From the Department of Radiology, General Infirmary at Leeds, West Yorkshire, England. From the 2000 RSNA scientific assembly. Received July 23, 2001; revision requested September 11; final revision received June 11, 2002; accepted July 1. Address correspondence to K.S.G., Department of Radiology, Pinderfields General Hospital, Aberford Rd, Wakefield, West Yorkshire WF1 4DG, England (e-mail: kanwargill@doctors.org.uk).
PURPOSE: To assess technical success rates and long-term clinical outcomes of primary renal arterial stent placement in atherosclerotic renal arterial stenosis (RAS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary stent placement was performed in 100 consecutive patients with atherosclerotic RAS. Indications for treatment were resistant hypertension (n = 25), impaired renal function, (n = 50), and both (n = 25). Immediate technical results were evaluated with angiography. Clinical outcomes were assessed with serial systolic and diastolic blood pressure and serum creatinine values obtained from retrospective review of case notes. Results obtained every 6 months after the procedure were compared with those obtained at the time of the procedure with the paired t test. Radiologic reports were evaluated for immediate and case notes for delayed complications.
RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 120 (95.2%) of 126 RAS in 95 patients. Mean follow-up was 25 months (median, 24 months; range, 166 months). Resistant hypertension was cured in two (4.2%) of 48 patients, had improved in 38 (79.1%), and had failed to respond to treatment in eight (16.7%). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly lower at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months (P < .01) than before the procedure. Among 65 patients treated for renal impairment, renal function improved in 20 (30.8%), stabilized in 25 (41.7%), and continued to deteriorate in 20 (30.8%). The mean serum creatinine level did not show significant change with time for this group. In the improved subgroup, it was significantly higher at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 42 months (P < .05) than prior to the procedure. Procedure-related complications occurred in 18 (18%) cases: Ten were minor and self-limiting and eight were major and included two procedure-related deaths.
CONCLUSION: In atherosclerotic RAS, primary stent deployment has a high technical success rate, producing clinical benefits in the majority of patients when performed for resistant hypertension and recovery of renal function.
© RSNA, 2003
Index terms: Interventional procedures, complications, 961.1268 Renal arteries, stenosis or obstruction, 961.721, 961.723 Renal arteries, transluminal angioplasty, 961.1282, 961.1286 Stents and prostheses, 961.1268, 961.1286
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Steinwender, W. Schutzenberger, F. Fellner, S. Honig, B. Schmitt, C. Focke, R. Hofmann, and F. Leisch 64-Detector CT Angiography in Renal Artery Stent Evaluation: Prospective Comparison with Selective Catheter Angiography Radiology, July 1, 2009; 252(1): 299 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Bates, J. E. Campbell, M. Broce, P. S. Lavigne, and M. A. Riley Serum Creatinine Stabilization Following Renal Artery Stenting Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, March 1, 2008; 42(1): 40 - 46. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Tan, R. Filobbos, G. Raghunathan, T. Nicholson, R. Fowler, M. Wright, and D. Eadington Efficacy of renal artery angioplasty and stenting in a solitary functioning kidney Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 1916 - 1919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Balk, G. Raman, M. Chung, S. Ip, A. Tatsioni, A. Alonso, P. Chew, S. J. Gilbert, and J. Lau Effectiveness of Management Strategies for Renal Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review Ann Intern Med, December 19, 2006; 145(12): 901 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. D. Garovic and S. C. Textor Renovascular Hypertension and Ischemic Nephropathy Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9): 1362 - 1374. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. de Silva, N. P. Nikitin, S. Bhandari, A. Nicholson, A. L. Clark, and J. G.F. Cleland Atherosclerotic renovascular disease in chronic heart failure: should we intervene? Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2005; 26(16): 1596 - 1605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Silva Jr Expert Commentary Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, December 1, 2004; 16(4): 276 - 279. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Weinrauch and J. A. D'Elia Renal artery stenosis: "fortuitous diagnosis," problematic therapy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 5, 2004; 43(9): 1614 - 1616. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||