|
|
||||||||
Evidence-based Practice |
1 From the Program for the Assessment of Radiological Technology, Departments of Radiology (E.H.G.O., J.J.N., A.C.M.V., A.Z.G., M.G.M.H.) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (E.H.G.O., J.J.N., A.C.M.V., M.G.M.H.), Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr Molewaterplein 50, Rm EE21-40a, 3015 GE Rotterdam, the Netherlands. From the 2001 RSNA scientific assembly. Received November 26, 2001; revision requested February 5, 2002; final revision received June 26; accepted July 16. Supported in part by the Foundation "Vereniging Trustfonds Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam," the Foundation "Gerrit Jan Mulder Stichting," and the "Revolving Fund" of the University Hospital Rotterdam. Address correspondence to M.G.M.H. (e-mail: hunink@epib.fgg.eur.nl).
PURPOSE: To systematically review and synthesize published data on the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the menisci and cruciate ligaments and to assess the effect of study design characteristics and magnetic field strength on diagnostic performance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Articles published between 1991 and 2000 were included if at least 30 patients were studied, arthroscopy was the reference standard, the magnetic field strength was reported, positivity criteria were defined, and the absolute numbers of true-positive, false-negative, true-negative, and false-positive results were available or derivable. Pooled weighted and summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed for tears of both menisci and both cruciate ligaments separately and for the four lesions combined, by using random effects models. Differences were assessed according to lesion type.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 120 retrieved articles were included. Pooled weighted sensitivity was higher for medial meniscal tears than that for lateral meniscal tears. However, pooled weighted specificity for the medial meniscus was lower than that for the lateral meniscus. In summary ROC analyses performed per lesion, various study design characteristics were found to influence diagnostic performance. Higher magnetic field strength significantly improved discriminatory power only for anterior cruciate ligament tears. When all lesions were combined in one overall summary ROC analysis, magnetic field strength was a significant but modest predictor of diagnostic performance.
CONCLUSION: Diagnostic performance of MR imaging of the knee is different according to lesion type and is influenced by various study design characteristics. Higher magnetic field strength modestly improves diagnostic performance, but a significant effect was demonstrated only for anterior cruciate ligament tears.
Supplemental material: radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2263011892/DC1.
© RSNA, 2003
Index terms: Knee, injuries, 452.485 Knee, ligaments, menisci, and cartilage, 452.485 Knee, MR, 452.121419 Magnetic resonance (MR), technology
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. RYTTER, L. K. JENSEN, J. P. BONDE, A. G. JURIK, and N. EGUND Occupational Kneeling and Meniscal Tears: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study in Floor Layers J Rheumatol, July 1, 2009; 36(7): 1512 - 1519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-I. Kuikka, P. Sillanpaa, V. M. Mattila, M. H. Niva, and H. K. Pihlajamaki Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Traumatic and Chronic Meniscal Tears of the Knee: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study in Young Adults Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2009; 37(5): 1003 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. De Smet, D. G. Blankenbaker, R. Kijowski, B. K. Graf, and K. Shinki MR Diagnosis of Posterior Root Tears of the Lateral Meniscus Using Arthroscopy as the Reference Standard Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2009; 192(2): 480 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.R. Arends, T.H. Hamza, J.C. van Houwelingen, M.H. Heijenbrok-Kal, M.G.M. Hunink, and T. Stijnen Bivariate Random Effects Meta-Analysis of ROC Curves Med Decis Making, September 1, 2008; 28(5): 621 - 638. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Hamza, J. B. Reitsma, and T. Stijnen Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Studies: A Comparison of Random Intercept, Normal-Normal, and Binomial-Normal Bivariate Summary ROC Approaches Med Decis Making, September 1, 2008; 28(5): 639 - 649. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. De Smet, D. H. Nathan, B. K. Graf, B. A. Haaland, and J. P. Fine Clinical and MRI Findings Associated with False-Positive Knee MR Diagnoses of Medial Meniscal Tears Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 93 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Duc, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, P. P. Koch, M. Zanetti, and J. Hodler Internal Knee Derangement Assessed with 3-minute Three-dimensional Isovoxel True FISP MR Sequence: Preliminary Study Radiology, February 1, 2008; 246(2): 526 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. De Smet and R. Mukherjee Clinical, MRI, and Arthroscopic Findings Associated with Failure to Diagnose a Lateral Meniscal Tear on Knee MRI Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 22 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Crawford, G. Walley, S. Bridgman, and N. Maffulli Magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy in the diagnosis of knee pathology, concentrating on meniscal lesions and ACL tears: a systematic review Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2007; 84(1): 5 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. J. Vincken, A. P. M. ter Braak, A. R. van Erkel, E. G. Coerkamp, T. P. W. de Rooy, S. de Lange, W. M. C. Mallens, L. N. J. E. M. Coene, R. M. Bloem, P. A. van Luijt, et al. MR Imaging: Effectiveness and Costs at Triage of Patients with Nonacute Knee Symptoms Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 85 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Roos, B. Chilla, M. Zanetti, M. Schmid, P. Koch, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, and J. Hodler MRI of Meniscal Lesions: Soft-Copy (PACS) and Hard-Copy Evaluation Versus Reviewer Experience. Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 786 - 790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Boks, D. Vroegindeweij, B. W. Koes, M. G. M. Hunink, and S. M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra Follow-up of Posttraumatic Ligamentous and Meniscal Knee Lesions Detected at MR Imaging: Systematic Review Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 863 - 871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. MINIGH Imaging Sports-related Injuries Radiol. Technol., November 1, 2005; 77(2): 121 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tatsioni, D. A. Zarin, N. Aronson, D. J. Samson, C. R. Flamm, C. Schmid, and J. Lau Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Technologies Ann Intern Med, June 21, 2005; 142(12_Part_2): 1048 - 1055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hayashino, M. Goto, Y. Noguchi, and T. Fukui Ventilation-Perfusion Scanning and Helical CT in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 740 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H. G. Oei, J. J. Nikken, A. Z. Ginai, G. P. Krestin, J. A. N. Verhaar, A. B. van Vugt, and M. G. M. Hunink Acute Knee Trauma: Value of a Short Dedicated Extremity MR Imaging Examination for Prediction of Subsequent Treatment Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 125 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bipat, A. S. Glas, F. J. M. Slors, A. H. Zwinderman, P. M. M. Bossuyt, and J. Stoker Rectal Cancer: Local Staging and Assessment of Lymph Node Involvement with Endoluminal US, CT, and MR Imaging--A Meta-Analysis Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 773 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Marx Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee Differs According to Lesion J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2003; 85(11): 2258 - 2258. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||