HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2263011925v1 226/3/849    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Weishaupt, D. Articles by Zanetti, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Weishaupt, D. Articles by Zanetti, M.

Morton Neuroma: MR Imaging in Prone, Supine, and Upright Weight-bearing Body Positions¹

¹ From the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland (D.W., K.T., J.K.W., B.M.); Orthopedic Practice, Zurich, Switzerland (H.P.K., H.Z.); and Departments of Orthopedic Surgery (P.V.) and Radiology (J.H., M.Z.), Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland. Received November 26, 2001; revision requested February 8, 2002; final revision received May 29; accepted July 15. Address correspondence to D.W. (e-mail: dominik.weishaupt@dmr.usz.ch).

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of prone, supine, and upright weight-bearing body positions on visibility, position, shape, and size of Morton neuroma during magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with 20 Morton neuromas underwent MR imaging of the forefoot in prone (plantar flexion of the foot), supine (dorsiflexion of the foot), and upright weight-bearing positions. Visibility (3 = good, 2 = moderate, 1 = poor), position relative to the metatarsal bone, shape, and transverse diameter of Morton neuroma were assessed on transverse T1-weighted MR images. Associations between different body positions and variables of interest were calculated with Wilcoxon signed rank test, ² test, and paired Student t test.

RESULTS: In the prone position, visibility of all 20 Morton neuromas was rated with a score of 3; visibility in the supine and weight-bearing positions was inferior (mean score, 2.4). All 20 (100%) Morton neuromas changed their position relative to the metatarsal bone between prone and supine and between prone and weight-bearing positions. When compared with the prone position, there was a difference in the shape of all 20 Morton neuromas in the weight-bearing position (P < .001). Between prone (mean transverse diameter of Morton neuroma, 8 mm) and supine (mean transverse diameter of Morton neuroma, 6 mm) positions, the transverse diameter of Morton neuroma significantly decreased by 2 mm (P = .03); between prone and weight-bearing positions, the decrease of the mean transverse diameter was also significant (difference, 2 mm; P = .03).

CONCLUSION: Morton neuroma appears significantly different during MR imaging in prone, supine, or weight-bearing positions. The transverse diameter of Morton neuroma is significantly larger on images obtained in the prone position than it is on images obtained in the supine and upright weight-bearing positions. Visibility of Morton neuroma is best on MR images obtained in the prone position.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Efficacy study • Foot, MR, 465.121411 • Foot, neoplasms, 465.315, 465.369 • Neuroma, 465.315, 465.369