Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2271020045
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eisenhuber, E.
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer-Prokop, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eisenhuber, E.
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer-Prokop, C.
(Radiology 2003;227:216-221.)
© RSNA, 2003


Thoracic Imaging

Detection of Monitoring Materials on Bedside Chest Radiographs with the Most Recent Generation of Storage Phosphor Plates: Dose Increase Does Not Improve Detection Performance1

Edith Eisenhuber, MD, Alfred Stadler, MD, MSc, Mathias Prokop, MD, Michael Fuchsjäger, MD, Michael Weber, MSc and Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology and Ludwig Boltzmann-Institute for Clinical and Experimental Radiologic Research, University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. Received February 6, 2002; revision requested April 15; revision received June 17; accepted August 8. Address correspondence to E.E. (e-mail: edith.eisenhuber@univie.ac.at).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of the most recent generation of storage phosphor plates for the detection of low-contrast catheter material on bedside chest radiographs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 10 patients in the intensive care unit, bedside chest radiographs were obtained with a 400-speed conventional screen-film system and with storage phosphor plates with exposure levels comparable to a 200-, 400-, or 800-speed conventional system. The chest radiograph was divided into 20 regions, 60% of which were superimposed with low-contrast catheter fragments. Six observers independently assessed the presence of catheter fragments by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology.

RESULTS: Detection performance (mean area under the ROC curve [Az]) with the storage phosphor plates was significantly superior to that with the screen-film system (Az = 0.76) at all three dose levels (Az = 0.88, 0.87, and 0.83 for 200-, 400-, and 800-speed doses, respectively; P < .05). Increasing the dose to a 200-speed system did not significantly increase detection performance compared with that with the 400-speed digital radiographs (Az = 0.88 vs 0.87). Dose reduction to 800 speed significantly deteriorated the detection performance (Az = 0.83) compared with that with the 400- and 200-speed digital radiographs, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The most recent generation of storage phosphor plates is superior to a 400-speed screen-film system for the detection of catheter material, even at an exposure level of 800 speed.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Radiography, bedside, 68.11 • Radiography, comparative studies, 68.11, 68.1215 • Radiography, storage phosphor, 68.1215 • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve • Thorax, radiography, 68.11, 68.1215




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. J. M. Kroft, W. J. H. Veldkamp, B. J. A. Mertens, M. V. Boot, and J. Geleijns
Comparison of Eight Different Digital Chest Radiography Systems: Variation in Detection of Simulated Chest Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 339 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Huda
The Current Concept of Speed Should Not Be Used to Describe Digital Imaging Systems
Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 345 - 346.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.