Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2272020455
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lvoff, N.
Right arrow Articles by Warren, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lvoff, N.
Right arrow Articles by Warren, R. S.
(Radiology 2003;227:68-72.)
© RSNA, 2003


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Distinguishing Features of Self-limiting Adult Small-Bowel Intussusception Identified at CT1

Natalya Lvoff, MD, Richard S. Breiman, MD, Fergus V. Coakley, MD, Ying Lu, PhD and Robert S. Warren, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (N.L., R.S.B., F.V.C., Y.L.) and Surgery (R.S.W.), University of California San Francisco, Box 0628, M-372, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628. Received April 23, 2002; revision requested July 8; revision received July 17; accepted August 28. Address correspondence to F.V.C. (e-mail: fergus.coakley@radiology.ucsf.edu).

PURPOSE: To determine if clinical or computed tomographic (CT) findings can be used to distinguish self-limiting cases of adult small-bowel intussusception from those requiring surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven cases of adult small-bowel intussusception were identified by a retrospective computerized search of 69,040 abdominopelvic CT examinations performed over a 4-year period. Two independent readers recorded CT features. Clinical findings and outcomes were determined by review of all available medical records. Outcome was classified as either surgical or self-limiting. Association between predictive variables and outcome was assessed by the Fisher exact test and logistic regression models. A multivariate, stepwise, logistic regression model was used to determine the best predictors of outcome.

RESULTS: Six patients (16%) underwent surgery, and all had lead-point tumors. Thirty-one patients were cared for conservatively (84%) and none required surgery at a mean follow-up of 5.2 months (range, 0–46 months). Multivariate, stepwise, logistic regression analysis showed intussusception length was the only variable that was independently predictive of outcome. All 20 patients with an intussusception length of 3.5 cm or less, as measured by either reader, had cases that were self-limiting. Seventeen patients had an intussusception length greater than 3.5 cm, as measured by either reader. Eleven patients had an intussusception that was self-limiting, and six patients had an intussusception that required surgery.

CONCLUSION: Intussusception length is the main factor in distinguishing the majority of small-bowel intussusceptions detected at CT that are self-limiting from the minority that require surgery. An intussusception that is shorter than 3.5 cm is likely to be self-limiting.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Intestines, CT,748.12115 • Intussusception, 748.732




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. M. Horton and E. K. Fishman
MDCT and 3D Imaging in Transient Enteroenteric Intussusception: Clinical Observations and Review of the Literature
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): 736 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. C. Silva, S. D. Beaty, A. K. Hara, J. G. Fletcher, J. L. Fidler, C. O. Menias, and C. D. Johnson
Spectrum of Normal and Abnormal CT Appearances of the Ileocecal Valve and Cecum with Endoscopic and Surgical Correlation
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2007; 27(4): 1039 - 1054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. M. Munden, J. F. Bruzzi, B. D. Coley, and R. F. Munden
Sonography of Pediatric Small-Bowel Intussusception: Differentiating Surgical from Nonsurgical Cases
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 275 - 279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Y. H. Kim, M. A. Blake, M. G. Harisinghani, K. Archer-Arroyo, P. F. Hahn, M. B. Pitman, and P. R. Mueller
Adult intestinal intussusception: CT appearances and identification of a causative lead point.
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2006; 26(3): 733 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular DiseaseHome page
C. Rajeswaran, A. Dawson, G. Bonney, C. Oxynos, V. L Nicholson, and S. G. Gilbey
Intussusception as a gastrointestinal complication of diabetes: case report and literature review
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, November 1, 2004; 4(6): 408 - 413.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. H. Choi, J. K. Han, S. H. Kim, J. M. Lee, K. H. Lee, Y. J. Kim, S. K. An, and B. I. Choi
Intussusception in Adults: From Stomach to Rectum
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2004; 183(3): 691 - 698.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.