|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technical Developments |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Medical School, 676 N St Clair St, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611 (V.B., F.S.P., E.J.R., S.A.G., A.S., K.A.S., J.P.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson (E.A.K.); and Siemens Medical Systems, Chicago, Ill (A.Z.). Received July 3, 2001; revision requested August 22; final revision received August 13, 2002; accepted September 27. Address correspondence to F.S.P. (e-mail: s-pereles@northwestern.edu).
The majority of spinal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has been performed with spin-echo sequences and spoiled gradient-echo sequences. Advances in gradient MR imaging performance now permit imaging with coherent steady-state sequences. In this study, the authors compare a three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence with a three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled-echo sequence for MR evaluation of the cervical spine in the transverse plane. Initial experience indicates that the steady-state sequence is superior to spoiled gradient-recalled-echo sequences for MR evaluation of cervical spine anatomy and abnormalities.
© RSNA, 2003
Index terms: Magnetic resonance (MR), pulse sequences, 31.121411, 31.121412 Spinal cord, MR, 31.121411, 31.121412 Spine, anatomy, 31.92 Spine, MR, 31.121411, 31.121412
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D.J. Seidenwurm and for the Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging Myelopathy AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2008; 29(5): 1032 - 1034. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||