Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print May 20, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2281020623
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2281020623v1
228/1/166    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Insko, E. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Insko, E. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, J. E.
(Radiology 2003;228:166-171.)
© RSNA, 2003


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Benign and Malignant Lesions of the Stomach: Evaluation of CT Criteria for Differentiation1

Erik K. Insko, MD, PhD, Marc S. Levine, MD, Bernard A. Birnbaum, MD2 and Jill E. Jacobs, MD2

1 From the Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Received May 28, 2002; revision requested July 26; revision received September 19; accepted November 18. Address correspondence to E.K.I. (e-mail: insko@rad.upenn.edu).

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomographic (CT) criteria for differentiating benign from malignant stomach lesions in patients with a thickened gastric wall at CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A radiology department file search revealed 36 patients with a thickened gastric wall at CT who underwent double-contrast barium suspension upper gastrointestinal tract examinations within 6 weeks before or after CT. The authors reviewed the CT images without knowledge of the final radiologic, endoscopic, or pathologic findings to determine the degree of gastric wall thickening and the symmetry, distribution, and enhancement of the thickened wall. The sensitivity and specificity of these findings for detection of malignancy were calculated.

RESULTS: Two of 36 patients had two gastric abnormalities each. The final diagnoses in the 38 cases were gastritis in 19, hiatal hernia in four, benign ulcer in three, benign (n = 3) or malignant (n = 8) gastric neoplasm in 11, and no gastric abnormality in one case. Mean wall thickness was 1.5 cm (range, 0.7–7.5 cm). The finding of gastric wall thickness of 1 cm or greater had a sensitivity of 100% but a specificity of only 42% for detection of malignant or potentially malignant stomach lesions. The finding of focal, eccentric, or enhancing wall thickening had a sensitivity of 93%, 71%, or 43%, respectively, and a specificity of 8%, 75%, or 88%, respectively, for detection of these lesions. Gastric wall thickening that was 1 cm or greater and was focal, eccentric, and enhancing had a specificity of 92% but a sensitivity of only 36% for detection of these lesions.

CONCLUSION: Gastric wall thickness of 1 cm or greater at CT had a sensitivity of 100% but a specificity of less than 50% for detection of malignant or potentially malignant stomach lesions that necessitated further diagnostic evaluation.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Gastritis, 72.291 • Gastrointestinal tract, CT, 72.12112, 72.12115 • Gastrointestinal tract, radiography, 72.123 • Stomach, CT, 72.12112, 72.12115 • Stomach, neoplasms, 72.31, 72.32




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C.-Y. Chen, D.-C. Wu, Y.-T. Kuo, C.-H. Lee, T.-S. Jaw, W.-Y. Kang, and J.-S. Hsu
MDCT for Differentiation of Category T1 and T2 Malignant Lesions from Benign Gastric Ulcers
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1505 - 1511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.