Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 11, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2282020699
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2282020699v1
228/2/473    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lucidarme, O.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lucidarme, O.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, G.
(Radiology 2003;228:473-479.)
© RSNA, 2003


Experimental Studies

Blood Flow Quantification with Contrast-enhanced US: "Entrance in the Section" Phenomenon—Phantom and Rabbit Study1

Olivier Lucidarme, MD, Stephanie Franchi-Abella, MD, Jean-Michel Correas, MD, PhD, S. Lori Bridal, PhD, Erol Kurtisovski, PhD and Geneviève Berger, MD, PhD

1 From the Parametric Imaging Laboratory, UMR 7623 CNRS and Paris University VI, 15 rue de l’École de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France (O.L., S.F.A., J.M.C., S.L.B., E.K., G.B.); Department of Radiology, Necker Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (O.L., S.F.A., J.M.C.); and Department of Radiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (O.L.). Received June 13, 2002; revision requested August 8; revision received October 17; accepted December 10. Address correspondence to S.L.B. (e-mail: bridal@lip.bhdc.jussieu.fr).

PURPOSE: To investigate changes in destruction-replenishment curves (in vitro and in vivo) that result from microbubble destruction in feeding vessels that pass through the imaging plane before microbubbles enter the region of interest (ROI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: During continuous injections of an ultrasonographic contrast agent, nonlinear gray-scale images were obtained in vitro in the longitudinal plane of a renal dialysis cartridge flow phantom (flow rates of 100, 200, and 400 mL/min) and in vivo in the coronal plane of the left kidneys of two rabbits (two kidneys). Destruction-replenishment curves were obtained for the dialysis cartridge in ROIs located immediately after the entrance of the microbubbles into the image plane and further from the entrance, after microbubbles had traveled across the complete length of the imaging plane. Replenishment curves were also obtained from ROIs in the rabbit kidneys at the level of segmental arteries, distal interlobar arteries, and the cortex.

RESULTS: The ROIs immediately after the entrance of the microbubbles in the image plane of the dialysis cartridge and in the segmental artery of the kidney followed a typical exponential function, A(1 - e-{alpha}t). Early portions of curves obtained in ROIs filled with microbubbles that had already passed through the image plane of the dialysis cartridge or in the renal cortex were not well described by such a function. The shape of the curve and the variations as a function of flow rate can be explained by means of a mathematical model based on indicator-dilution theory.

CONCLUSION: When the feeding vessels of an ROI travel across the ultrasound field before they reach the measurement region, the typical shape of the replenishment curve is modified (reduced velocity parameter and plateau).

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Blood, flow dynamics, 81.12988 • Kidney, US, 81.12984, 81.12988 • Microbubbles, 81.12988 • Phantoms, 81.12984, 81.12988 • Test objects, 81.12984, 81.12988 • Ultrasound (US), contrast media 81.12984, 81.12988




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
C. Jimenez, R. de Gracia, A. Aguilera, S. Alonso, A. Cirugeda, J. Benito, R. M. Regojo, R. Aguilar, A. Warlters, R. Gomez, et al.
In Situ Kidney Insonation With Microbubble Contrast Agents Does Not Cause Renal Tissue Damage in a Porcine Model
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2008; 27(11): 1607 - 1615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. J. Paltiel, L. A. Kalish, R. A. Susaeta, F. Frauscher, P. L. O'Kane, and L. G. Freitas-Filho
Pulse-Inversion US Imaging of Testicular Ischemia: Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses in a Rabbit Model
Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 718 - 729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Krix, M.-A. Weber, H. Krakowski-Roosen, H. B. Huttner, S. Delorme, H.-U. Kauczor, and W. Hildebrandt
Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Perfusion Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2005; 24(4): 431 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. B. Kruskal
Science to Practice: Blood Flow Quantification with Contrast-enhanced US: "Entrance in the Section" Phenomenon--Phantom and Rabbit Study
Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 298 - 299.
[Full Text] [PDF]