Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 20, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2282020409
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2282020409v1
228/2/523    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warmuth, C.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warmuth, C.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmer, C.
(Radiology 2003;228:523-532.)
© RSNA, 2003


Neuroradiology

Quantification of Blood Flow in Brain Tumors: Comparison of Arterial Spin Labeling and Dynamic Susceptibility-weighted Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging1

Carsten Warmuth, MS, Matthias Günther, PhD and Claus Zimmer, MD

1 From the Department of Neuroradiology, Charité Medical School, Humboldt University of Berlin, Schumannstrasse 20-21, D-10098 Berlin, Germany (C.W., C.Z.); and Advanced MRI Technologies, Sebastopol, Calif (M.G.). Received April 11, 2002; revision requested June 17; final revision received November 21; accepted December 19. C.W. supported by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft). Address correspondence to C.Z. (e-mail: claus.zimmer@charite.de).

PURPOSE: To implement an arterial spin labeling technique that is feasible in routine examinations and to test the method and compare it with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast material–enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for evaluation of tumor blood flow (TBF) in patients with brain tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with histologically proven brain tumors were examined at 1.5 T. A second version of quantitative imaging of perfusion by using a single subtraction with addition of thin-section periodic saturation after inversion and a time delay (Q2TIPS) technique of pulsed arterial spin labeling in the multisection mode was implemented. After arterial spin labeling, a combined T2- and T2*-weighted first-pass bolus perfusion study (gadopentetate dimeglumine, 0.2 mmol/kg) was performed by using a double-echo echo-planar imaging sequence. In regions of interest, maps of absolute and relative cerebral blood flow were computed and analyzed with arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging, respectively.

RESULTS: Both techniques yielded the highest perfusion values in imaging of glioblastomas and the lowest values in imaging of two low-grade gliomas that both showed strong gadopentetate dimeglumine enhancement. There was a close linear correlation between dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging and arterial spin labeling in the tumor region of interest (linear regression coefficient, R = 0.83; P < .005). Blood flow is underestimated with arterial spin labeling at low flow rates. High- and low-grade gliomas can be distinguished at the same level of significance with both methods. Absolute TBF is less important for tumor grading than is the ratio of TBF to age-dependent mean brain perfusion.

CONCLUSION: Arterial spin labeling is a suitable method for assessment of microvascular perfusion and allows distinction between high- and low-grade gliomas.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Brain, perfusion, 10.12144 • Brain neoplasms, diagnosis, 10.36, 10.38 • Magnetic resonance (MR), perfusion study, 10.121411, 10.121412, 10.12143, 10.12149 • Neoplasms, metastases, 00.33, 60.33, 84.33, 854.33




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Schor-Bardach, D. C. Alsop, I. Pedrosa, S. A. Solazzo, X. Wang, R. P. Marquis, M. B. Atkins, M. Regan, S. Signoretti, R. E. Lenkinski, et al.
Does Arterial Spin-labeling MR Imaging-measured Tumor Perfusion Correlate with Renal Cell Cancer Response to Antiangiogenic Therapy in a Mouse Model?
Radiology, June 1, 2009; 251(3): 731 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.R. Deibler, J.M. Pollock, R.A. Kraft, H. Tan, J.H. Burdette, and J.A. Maldjian
Arterial Spin-Labeling in Routine Clinical Practice, Part 3: Hyperperfusion Patterns
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2008; 29(8): 1428 - 1435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J.M. Pollock, A.R. Deibler, J.H. Burdette, R.A. Kraft, H. Tan, A.B. Evans, and J.A. Maldjian
Migraine Associated Cerebral Hyperperfusion with Arterial Spin-Labeled MR Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2008; 29(8): 1494 - 1497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.R. Deibler, J.M. Pollock, R.A. Kraft, H. Tan, J.H. Burdette, and J.A. Maldjian
Arterial Spin-Labeling in Routine Clinical Practice, Part 1: Technique and Artifacts
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2008; 29(7): 1228 - 1234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
T. Noguchi, T. Yoshiura, A. Hiwatashi, O. Togao, K. Yamashita, E. Nagao, T. Shono, M. Mizoguchi, S. Nagata, T. Sasaki, et al.
Perfusion Imaging of Brain Tumors Using Arterial Spin-Labeling: Correlation with Histopathologic Vascular Density
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 688 - 693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. J. van Laar, Y. van der Graaf, W. P. T. M. Mali, J. van der Grond, and J. Hendrikse
Effect of Cerebrovascular Risk Factors on Regional Cerebral Blood Flow
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 246(1): 198 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
H.S. Kim and S.Y. Kim
A Prospective Study on the Added Value of Pulsed Arterial Spin-Labeling and Apparent Diffusion Coefficients in the Grading of Gliomas
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2007; 28(9): 1693 - 1699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S. Chawla, S. Wang, R.L. Wolf, J.H. Woo, J. Wang, D.M. O'Rourke, K.D. Judy, M.S. Grady, E.R. Melhem, and H. Poptani
Arterial Spin-Labeling and MR Spectroscopy in the Differentiation of Gliomas
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2007; 28(9): 1683 - 1689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Q. Zhou, P. Guo, G. D. Kruh, P. Vicini, X. Wang, and J. M. Gallo
Predicting Human Tumor Drug Concentrations from a Preclinical Pharmacokinetic Model of Temozolomide Brain Disposition
Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2007; 13(14): 4271 - 4279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Law, R. Young, J. Babb, M. Rad, T. Sasaki, D. Zagzag, and G. Johnson
Comparing Perfusion Metrics Obtained from a Single Compartment Versus Pharmacokinetic Modeling Methods Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging with Glioma Grade.
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2006; 27(9): 1975 - 1982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E T Petersen, I Zimine, Y-C L Ho, and X Golay
Non-invasive measurement of perfusion: a critical review of arterial spin labelling techniques
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2006; 79(944): 688 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. A. Weber, S. Zoubaa, M. Schlieter, E. Juttler, H. B. Huttner, K. Geletneky, C. Ittrich, M. P. Lichy, A. Kroll, J. Debus, et al.
Diagnostic performance of spectroscopic and perfusion MRI for distinction of brain tumors
Neurology, June 27, 2006; 66(12): 1899 - 1906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Provenzale, S. Mukundan, and D. P. Barboriak
Diffusion-weighted and Perfusion MR Imaging for Brain Tumor Characterization and Assessment of Treatment Response.
Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 632 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S.J. Mills, T.A. Patankar, H.A. Haroon, D. Baleriaux, R. Swindell, and A. Jackson
Do cerebral blood volume and contrast transfer coefficient predict prognosis in human glioma?
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2006; 27(4): 853 - 858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
H. Kimura, H. Takeuchi, Y. Koshimoto, H. Arishima, H. Uematsu, Y. Kawamura, T. Kubota, and H. Itoh
Perfusion Imaging of Meningioma by Using Continuous Arterial Spin-Labeling: Comparison with Dynamic Susceptibility-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced MR Images and Histopathologic Features
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 85 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Wintermark, M. Sesay, E. Barbier, K. Borbely, W. P. Dillon, J. D. Eastwood, T. C. Glenn, C. B. Grandin, S. Pedraza, J.-F. Soustiel, et al.
Comparative Overview of Brain Perfusion Imaging Techniques
Stroke, September 1, 2005; 36(9): e83 - e99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Wang, Y. Zhang, R. L. Wolf, A. C. Roc, D. C. Alsop, and J. A. Detre
Amplitude-modulated Continuous Arterial Spin-labeling 3.0-T Perfusion MR Imaging with a Single Coil: Feasibility Study
Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 218 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Manka, F. Traber, J. Gieseke, H. H. Schild, and C. K. Kuhl
Three-dimensional Dynamic Susceptibility-weighted Perfusion MR Imaging at 3.0 T: Feasibility and Contrast Agent Dose
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 869 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. C. Miller, H. H. Pien, D. Sahani, A. G. Sorensen, and J. H. Thrall
Imaging Angiogenesis: Applications and Potential for Drug Development
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 2, 2005; 97(3): 172 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]