HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2283020243v1 228/3/669    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Willinek, W. A. Articles by Kuhl, C. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Willinek, W. A. Articles by Kuhl, C. K.

Sensitivity Encoding for Fast MR Imaging of the Brain in Patients with Stroke¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, D-53105 Bonn, Germany (W.A.W., M.v.F., B.N., H.H.S., C.K.K.); and Philips Medical Systems, Hamburg, Germany (J.G.). From the 2001 RSNA scientific assembly. Received March 18, 2002; revision requested June 4; final revision received December 13; accepted January 10, 2003. Address correspondence to W.A.W. (e-mail: willinek@uni-bonn.de).

PURPOSE: To evaluate sensitivity encoding (SENSE) technique in a clinical setting for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients who are suspected of having infarction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This intraindividual comparative study included 62 patients suspected of having cerebral ischemia. Patients underwent T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) (n = 62), T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) (n = 48), and single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (n = 27) with standard sequential and SENSE MR acquisitions with a 1.5-T magnet and phased-array coil. With SENSE, acquisition time was reduced from 1 minute 12 seconds to 35 seconds for FLAIR and from 1 minute 18 seconds to 39 seconds for T2-weighted TSE imaging. For diffusion-weighted imaging, echo train length was shortened (78 vs 71 msec) to reduce susceptibility effects while acquisition time was maintained. Two radiologists scored quality of standard and SENSE images with a five-point scale and assessed presence of artifacts (motion, susceptibility) and lesion conspicuity. To assess statistical significance, Wilcoxon signed rank and ² tests were used.

RESULTS: Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in terms of image quality and presence of artifacts between standard and SENSE T2-weighted TSE (image quality, P = .724; presence of artifacts, P = .378) and FLAIR (image quality, P = .127; presence of artifacts, P = .275) images. Image quality at SENSE diffusion-weighted imaging was scored significantly higher compared with that at standard diffusion-weighted imaging (P = .002). Susceptibility artifacts were significantly reduced at SENSE diffusion-weighted imaging when compared with those at standard diffusion-weighted imaging (P < .001). Conspicuity of 84 lesions was rated equivalent with both standard and SENSE protocols.

CONCLUSION: SENSE allowed acquisition of T2-weighted TSE and FLAIR images with image quality and lesion conspicuity that did not differ from those of standard acquisition techniques but in only half the acquisition time. Use of SENSE with diffusion-weighted imaging significantly reduces susceptibility artifacts while lesion conspicuity is maintained.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Brain, ischemia, 10.781 • Brain, MR, 10.121411, 10.121413, 10.12144 • Magnetic resonance (MR), technology

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y.A. Bhagat, D.J. Emery, S. Naik, T. Yeo, and C. Beaulieu Comparison of Generalized Autocalibrating Partially Parallel Acquisitions and Modified Sensitivity Encoding for Diffusion Tensor Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2007; 28(2): 293 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Yoshikawa, H. Kawamitsu, D. G. Mitchell, Y. Ohno, Y. Ku, Y. Seo, M. Fujii, and K. Sugimura ADC measurement of abdominal organs and lesions using parallel imaging technique. Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1521 - 1530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J M U-King-Im, R A Trivedi, M J Graves, K Harkness, H Eales, I Joubert, B Koo, N Antoun, E A Warburton, J H Gillard, et al. Utility of an ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging protocol in recent and semi-recent strokes J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2005; 76(7): 1002 - 1005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M Ryan, P Cunningham, C Cantwell, D Brennan, and S Eustace A comparison of fast MRI of hips with and without parallel imaging using SENSE Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2005; 78(928): 299 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Taouli, A. J. Martin, A. Qayyum, R. B. Merriman, D. Vigneron, B. M. Yeh, and F. V. Coakley Parallel Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Diffusion-Weighted MRI of the Liver: Preliminary Experience in Healthy Volunteers Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2004; 183(3): 677 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]