Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print July 29, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2283020376
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2283020376v1
228/3/709    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ward, J.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ward, J.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P. J.
(Radiology 2003;228:709-718.)
© RSNA, 2003


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Colorectal Hepatic Metastases: Detection with SPIO-enhanced Breath-hold MR Imaging—Comparison of Optimized Sequences1

Janice Ward, MSc, DCR, J. Ashley Guthrie, BA, MB, MRCP, FRCR, Daniel Wilson, MSc, Paul Arnold, BSc, J. Peter Lodge, MD, FRCS, Giles J. Toogood, MA, DM, FRCS, Judith I. Wyatt, MRCPath, MB, ChB and Philip J. Robinson, MB, BS, FRCP, FRCR

1 From the Department of Clinical Radiology (J.W., J.A.G., D.W., P.A., P.J.R.), Hepatobiliary and Transplantation Unit (J.P.L., G.J.T.), and Department of Histopathology (J.I.W.), St James’s University Hospital, Beckett St, Leeds LS9 7TF, England. Received March 28, 2002; revision requested June 10; final revision received December 18; accepted January 23, 2003. Address correspondence to J.W. (e-mail: janice.ward@leedsth.nhs.uk).

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of four breath-hold magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences to establish the most effective superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)–enhanced sequence for detection of colorectal hepatic metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with colorectal hepatic metastases underwent T1-weighted gradient-echo (GRE) and T2-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) MR imaging before and after SPIO enhancement. Four sequences were optimized for lesion detection: T2-weighted FSE, multiecho data image combination (MEDIC), T2-weighted GRE with an 11-msec echo time (TE), and T2-weighted GRE with a 15-msec TE. Images were reviewed independently by three blinded observers. The accuracy of each sequence was measured by using alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis. All results were correlated with findings at surgery, intraoperative ultrasonography, or histopathologic examination. Differences between the mean results of the three observers were measured by using the Student t test.

RESULTS: Postcontrast T2-weighted GRE sequences were the most accurate and were significantly superior to postcontrast T2-weighted FSE and unenhanced sequences alone (P < .05). For all lesions that were malignant or smaller than 1 cm, respectively, mean accuracies of postcontrast sequences were 0.082 and 0.64 for T2-weighted FSE, 0.90 and 0.78 for MEDIC, 0.92 and 0.80 for GRE with an 11-msec TE, 0.93 and 0.82 for GRE with a 15-msec TE, and 0.81 and 0.62 for unenhanced sequences.

CONCLUSION: Optimized SPIO-enhanced T2-weighted GRE combined with unenhanced T2-weighted FSE MR sequences were the most sensitive. Breath-hold FSE postcontrast sequences offer no improvement in sensitivity compared with unenhanced sequences alone.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Iron • Liver neoplasms, metastases, 761.33 • Liver neoplasms, MR, 761.121411, 761.121412, 761. 121415, 761.121417, 761.12143 • Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies, 761.121411, 761.121412, 761. 121415, 761.121417, 761.12143 • Magnetic resonance (MR), contrast enhancement, 761.12143 • Magnetic resonance (MR), contrast media, 761.12143




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
C. Charnsangavej, B. Clary, Y. Fong, A. Grothey, T. M. Pawlik, and M. A. Choti
Selection of Patients for Resection of Hepatic Colorectal Metastases: Expert Consensus Statement
Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2006; 13(10): 1261 - 1268.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M.-J. Kim, J. H. Kim, J. Y. Choi, S. H. Park, J.-J. Chung, K. W. Kim, and D. G. Mitchell
Optimal TE for SPIO-enhanced gradient-recalled echo MRI for the detection of focal hepatic lesions.
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): W255 - W266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Ward, P. J. Robinson, J. A. Guthrie, S. Downing, D. Wilson, J. P. A. Lodge, K. R. Prasad, G. J. Toogood, and J. I. Wyatt
Liver Metastases in Candidates for Hepatic Resection: Comparison of Helical CT and Gadolinium- and SPIO-enhanced MR Imaging
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 170 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Bipat, M. S. van Leeuwen, E. F. I. Comans, M. E. J. Pijl, P. M. M. Bossuyt, A. H. Zwinderman, and J. Stoker
Colorectal Liver Metastases: CT, MR Imaging, and PET for Diagnosis--Meta-analysis
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 123 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
P Manoharan and J Ward
MRI in the assessment of focal liver lesions in the non-cirrhotic patient
Imaging, September 1, 2004; 16(4): 338 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.