Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2291010282
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lanzkowsky, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lanzkowsky, L.
(Radiology 2003;229:233-238.)
© RSNA, 2003


Breast Imaging

Solid Breast Masses Diagnosed as Fibroadenoma at Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy: Acceptable Rates of Growth at Long-term Follow-up1

Paula B. Gordon, MD, Faith A. Gagnon, HBSc and Leora Lanzkowsky, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, 750 W Broadway, Suite 505, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 1H4. From the 2000 RSNA scientific assembly. Received January 8, 2001; revision requested February 15; final revision received February 17, 2003; accepted March 10. Address correspondence to P.B.G.

PURPOSE: To determine what growth rate is acceptable before recommending histologic diagnosis of solid breast lesions diagnosed as fibroadenoma at fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 1,070 consecutive patients with breast lesions diagnosed as fibroadenoma at FNAB, three measurements of each mass were performed at the initial visit when FNAB was performed and at each follow-up ultrasonographic examination. Changes in volumes were calculated. At one or more visits, 194 masses showed an increase in volume. Nonfibroadenomas were excluded, and the data were used for comparison. Percentiles (90th and 95th) for percentage change in volume per month were used to determine acceptable changes in dimensions (specifically, greatest anteroposterior, parallel-to-skin, and perpendicular-to-skin dimensions).

RESULTS: There were 567 interval measurements of 179 masses in 173 patients younger than 50 years and 50 measurements of 15 masses in 14 patients 50 years or older at the time of FNAB. The 95th percentile for percentage change in volume per month was approximately 16% for patients younger than 50 years; the 90th percentile was approximately 13% for patients 50 years or older. The 95th percentile mean change in dimension in a 6-month interval for those younger than 50 years was 20%; the 90th percentile change for those 50 years or older was also 20%. All excised masses with slower growth proved benign at histologic examination.

CONCLUSION: Solid breast masses diagnosed as fibroadenomas at FNAB may be safely followed up if volume growth rate is less than 16% per month in those younger than 50 years and less than 13% per month in those 50 years or older. Acceptable mean change in dimension for a 6-month interval is 20% for all ages.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Breast, biopsy, 00.1261 • Breast neoplasms, diagnosis, 00.30 • Breast neoplasms, US, 00.1298 • Fibroadenoma, 00.311




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Vade, V. S. Lafita, K. A. Ward, J. E. Lim-Dunham, and D. Bova
Role of Breast Sonography in Imaging of Adolescents with Palpable Solid Breast Masses
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): 659 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. Irshad, S. J. Ackerman, T. L. Pope, C. K. Moses, T. Rumboldt, and B. Panzegrau
Rare Breast Lesions: Correlation of Imaging and Histologic Features with WHO Classification
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2008; 28(5): 1399 - 1414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Sklair-Levy, T. Sella, T. Alweiss, I. Craciun, E. Libson, and B. Mally
Incidence and Management of Complex Fibroadenomas
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 214 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
O. Graf, T. H. Helbich, G. Hopf, C. Graf, and E. A. Sickles
Probably Benign Breast Masses at US: Is Follow-up an Acceptable Alternative to Biopsy?
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 87 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Costantini, P. Belli, R. Lombardi, G. Franceschini, A. Mule, and L. Bonomo
Characterization of solid breast masses: use of the sonographic breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon.
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2006; 25(5): 649 - 659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. M. Hall and P. Gordon
Acceptable Rates of Growth in Fibroadenomas Diagnosed with Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy [letter] * Dr Gordon and colleagues respond:
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 602 - 602.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Should Fibroadenomas Be Followed Up?
Stefano Ciatto, MD
Radiology Online, 5 Jan 2004 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.