Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2291020658
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Demir, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dousset, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Demir, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dousset, V.
(Radiology 2003;229:37-43.)
© RSNA, 2003


Neuroradiology

Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging with Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Apparent Diffusion Tensor Maps in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy1

Ayhan Demir, MD, Mario Ries, PhD, Crit T. W. Moonen, PhD, Jean-Marc Vital, MD, Joël Dehais, MD, Pierre Arne, MD, Jean-Marie Caillé, MD and Vincent Dousset, MD, PhD

1 From the Departments of Neuroradiology (A.D., J.M.C., V.D.), Spinal Orthopedics (J.M.V.), Rheumatology (J.D.), and Functional Neurologic Laboratory (P.A.), CHU-Pellegrin, Place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux, France; and Department of Magnetic Resonance of Biologic Systems, CNRS/Université Bordeaux, France (M.R., C.T.W.M.). Received May 30, 2002; revision requested July 18; final revision received December 31; accepted February 7, 2003. Address correspondence to V.D. (e-mail: vincent.dousset@chu-bordeaux.fr).

PURPOSE: To evaluate diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with cervical spondylosis and/or myelopathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multishot echo-planar imaging sequence with calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and apparent diffusion tensor (ADT) was applied in 36 patients with symptomatic cervical spondylosis. Diffusion-weighted images read by two neuroradiologists were compared with T2-weighted fast spin-echo images read independently by three neuroradiologists with regard to clinical status (n = 36). MR findings in a selected subgroup of 20 patients whose clinical status was confirmed by electrophysiologic examination also were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of both T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (ADC and ADT) were calculated and compared.

RESULTS: Patients with myelopathy had abnormal ADC (17 of 21) and ADT (15 of 19) maps with increased ADC and ADT values and decreased anisotropy. For the detection of myelopathy, diffusion-weighted ADC maps had a sensitivity of 80% (17 of 21), while T2-weighted images had a sensitivity of 61% (13 of 21). The negative predictive value was 63% (seven of 11) and 60% (12 of 20) for ADC maps and T2-weighted images, respectively. Conversely, the specificity of diffusion-weighted images (53%; seven of 13) was lower than that of T2-weighted images (92%; 12 of 13). In patients with myelopathy confirmed at electrophysiologic examination, the sensitivity of diffusion-weighted images increased to 92% (12 of 13) and the negative predictive value increased to 75% (three of four), while T2-weighted images had a 53% (seven of 13) sensitivity and a 50% (six of 12) negative predictive value.

CONCLUSION: Diffusion weighting improved the sensitivity of imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Magnetic resonance (MR), diffusion tensor, 34.12144 • Spinal cord, compression, 341.77 • Spinal cord, diseases, 341.79




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
B.M. Ellingson, J.L. Ulmer, S.N. Kurpad, and B.D. Schmit
Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2008; 29(10): 1976 - 1982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
B.M. Ellingson, J.L. Ulmer, S.N. Kurpad, and B.D. Schmit
Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging of the Neurologically Intact Human Spinal Cord
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2008; 29(7): 1279 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. W. Lee, K. S. Park, J. H. Kim, J.-Y. Choi, S. H. Hong, S.-H. Park, and H. S. Kang
Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Idiopathic Acute Transverse Myelitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): W52 - W57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
D.J. Seidenwurm and for the Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging
Myelopathy
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2008; 29(5): 1032 - 1034.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
K. Shanmuganathan, R.P. Gullapalli, J. Zhuo, and S.E. Mirvis
Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging in Cervical Spine Trauma
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 655 - 659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A. Ozanne, T. Krings, D. Facon, P. Fillard, J.L. Dumas, H. Alvarez, D. Ducreux, and P. Lasjaunias
MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Fiber Tracking in Spinal Cord Arteriovenous Malformations: A Preliminary Study
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2007; 28(7): 1271 - 1279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. Renoux, D. Facon, P. Fillard, I. Huynh, P. Lasjaunias, and D. Ducreux
MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Fiber Tracking in Inflammatory Diseases of the Spinal Cord.
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2006; 27(9): 1947 - 1951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
D. Facon, A. Ozanne, P. Fillard, J.-F. Lepeintre, C. Tournoux-Facon, and D. Ducreux
MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Fiber Tracking in Spinal Cord Compression
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2005; 26(6): 1587 - 1594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]