| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obstetric Imaging |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (D.L., T.S.M.) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (D.L., G.W.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215; Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (R.R.R.); and Department of Radiology, Lucille Salter Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, Palo Alto, Calif (P.D.B.). Received July 10, 2002; revision requested August 23; final revision received April 27, 2003; accepted May 5. Supported by a National Institutes of Health grant, National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke, NS 37945. Address correspondence to D.L. (e-mail: dlevine@caregroup.harvard.edu).
PURPOSE: To evaluate with respect to gestational age (GA) the effect of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on changes in diagnosis, patient counseling, and case management regarding fetuses suspected of having central nervous system (CNS) anomalies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors compared images from 242 ultrasonographic (US) studies and 242 MR imaging studies of the CNS in 214 fetuses. Reference standards of postnatal physical examination, imaging, surgical, and autopsy findings were available in 171 (79.9%) fetuses. Referring physicians were surveyed on how MR imaging findings changed patient counseling or case management. Outcomes were compared with respect to GA. Statistical tests used were the Fisher exact test, Student t test, and analysis of variance.
RESULTS: Confirmatory US findings were normal in 69 fetuses. MR imaging findings changed diagnosis in 46 of 145 (31.7%) fetuses with abnormal US findings. The mean GA of 72 of 145 fetuses with changes in maternal counseling (25.9 weeks) was significantly greater than that in 73 of 145 fetuses without changes in maternal counseling (22.6 weeks, P < .01). The mean GA of the 46 fetuses with changes in diagnosis (26.3 weeks) was significantly greater than that of the 99 fetuses with no major change in diagnosis (23.3 weeks, P < .01). There were 27 of 145 changes in case management, with no significant difference in mean GA of fetuses with and those without changes in case management. In fetuses with abnormal US findings, MR images were used to decide to terminate the pregnancy (n = 13; mean GA, 20.1 weeks), continue the pregnancy (n = 4; mean GA, 19.2 weeks), direct the mode and/or location of delivery (n = 5; mean GA, 30.5 weeks), and direct perinatal care (n = 5; mean GA, 30.2 weeks).
CONCLUSION: When a CNS anomaly is detected or suspected at US, MR imaging may demonstrate additional findings that can alter diagnosis and case management. Changes in management are GA dependent.
© RSNA, 2003
Index terms: Fetus, abnormalities, 856.874 • Fetus, central nervous system, 856.874 • Fetus, MR, 856.121416 • Fetus, US, 856.1298 • Magnetic resonance (MR), rapid imaging, 856.121416
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. Levine, H. A. Feldman, J. F. Kazan Tannus, J. A. Estroff, M. Magnino, C. D. Robson, T. Y. Poussaint, C. E. Barnewolt, T. S. Mehta, and R. L. Robertson Frequency and Cause of Disagreements in Diagnoses for Fetuses Referred for Ventriculomegaly Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 516 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. R. Benacerraf, T. D. Shipp, B. Bromley, and D. Levine What Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Add to the Prenatal Sonographic Diagnosis of Ventriculomegaly? J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2007; 26(11): 1513 - 1522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. F. Kazan-Tannus, V. Dialani, M. L. Kataoka, G. Chiang, H. A. Feldman, J. S. Brown, and D. Levine MR Volumetry of Brain and CSF in Fetuses Referred for Ventriculomegaly Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 145 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O.A. Glenn and A.J. Barkovich Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis, part 1. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2006; 27(8): 1604 - 1611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. S. von Koch, O. A. Glenn, R. B. Goldstein, and A. J. Barkovich Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Enhances Detection of Spinal Cord Anomalies in Patients With Sonographically Detected Bony Anomalies of the Spine J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2005; 24(6): 781 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. J. Woodward, R. Sohaey, A. Kennedy, and K. K. Koeller From the Archives of the AFIP: A Comprehensive Review of Fetal Tumors with Pathologic Correlation RadioGraphics, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 215 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. Frates, A. J. Kumar, C. B. Benson, V. L. Ward, and C. M. Tempany Fetal Anomalies: Comparison of MR Imaging and US for Diagnosis Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 398 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. S. Smith, J. A. Estroff, C. E. Barnewolt, J. B. Mulliken, and D. Levine Prenatal Diagnosis of Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate Using MRI Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 229 - 235. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Malinger, D. Lev, T. Lerman-Sagie, D. Levine, and P. Barnes Fetal Central Nervous System: MR Imaging versus Dedicated US--Need for Prospective, Blind, Comparative Studies [letter] * Drs Levine and Barnes respond: Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 306 - 307. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. V. Valsky, L. Ben-Sira, S. Porat, N. Yanai, A. Lewin, M. Nadjari, J. M. Gomori, and S. Yagel The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Isolated Mild Ventriculomegaly J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2004; 23(4): 519 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
