Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 27, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2291021284
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2291021284v1
229/1/75    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vilgrain, V.
Right arrow Articles by Menu, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vilgrain, V.
Right arrow Articles by Menu, Y.
(Radiology 2003;229:75-79.)
© RSNA, 2003


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Prevalence of Hepatic Hemangioma in Patients with Focal Nodular Hyperplasia: MR Imaging Analysis1

Valérie Vilgrain, MD, Florence Uzan, MD, Giuseppe Brancatelli, MD, Michael P. Federle, MD, Magali Zappa, MD and Yves Menu, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (V.V., F.U., G.B., M.Z., Y.M.); and Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.P.F.). Received October 4, 2002; revision requested December 12; revision received January 10, 2003; accepted February 28. Address correspondence to G.B., Department of Radiology, University of Palermo, Via Villaermosa 29, Palermo 90139, Italy (e-mail: gbranca@yahoo.com).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of hepatic hemangioma in a large population of patients with focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and to determine if the prevalence is higher than that in patients with other hepatic masses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a period of 40 months, 247 patients with one or more hepatic masses underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at our institution and met the inclusion criteria for this study. One hundred forty-eight patients received a diagnosis of FNH (study group). Ninety-nine patients had a lesion other than FNH and had no history of chronic liver disease (control group). Imaging findings of the main lesion and presence of associated hemangioma were investigated. {chi}2 analysis was used to determine if there was a statistically significant difference in the two groups regarding the number of patients with associated masses.

RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 148 patients (20%) in the study group had FNH with one or more associated hepatic hemangiomas. Among the 99 patients in the control group, nine (9%) had an associated hemangioma. The prevalence of hemangioma was significantly higher (P < .02) in the study group than in the control group. The prevalence of hemangioma in patients with a solitary FNH lesion compared with that in patients with multiple FNH lesions was not significantly different.

CONCLUSION: Patients with FNH are more likely to have an associated hepatic hemangioma than are those with another type of focal hepatic mass.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Liver, focal nodular hyperplasia, 761.3198 • Liver, hemangioma, 761.3194 • Liver, MR, 761.121411, 761.121412, 761.121415, 761.12143 • Liver neoplasms, diagnosis • Liver neoplasms, MR, 761.121411, 761.121412, 761.121415, 761.12143




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
I. R. Kamel, E. Liapi, and E. K. Fishman
Focal nodular hyperplasia: lesion evaluation using 16-MDCT and 3D CT angiography.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1587 - 1596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
V Glinkova, O Shevah, M Boaz, A Levine, and H Shirin
Hepatic haemangiomas: possible association with female sex hormones
Gut, September 1, 2004; 53(9): 1352 - 1355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. W. Ragozzino, G. Brancatelli, V. Vilgrain, M. P. Federle, F. Uzan, M. Zappa, and Y. Menu
Biases Likely Invalidate the Conclusions [letter] * Dr Brancatelli and colleagues respond:
Radiology, June 1, 2004; 231(3): 926 - 927.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.