Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2291020582
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Harmsen, W. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Harmsen, W. S.
(Radiology 2003;229:81-90.)
© RSNA, 2003


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Pancreatic Malignancy: Value of Arterial, Pancreatic, and Hepatic Phase Imaging with Multi–Detector Row CT1

Joel G. Fletcher, MD, Maurits J. Wiersema, MD, Michael A. Farrell, MD, Jeff L. Fidler, MD, Lawrence J. Burgart, MD, Takashi Koyama, MD, C. Daniel Johnson, MD, David H. Stephens, MD, Ellen M. Ward, MD and W. Scott Harmsen, MS

1 From the Department of Radiology (J.G.F., M.A.F., J.L.F., T.K., C.D.J., D.H.S., E.M.W.), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Departments of Internal Medicine (M.J.W.) and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (L.J.B.), and Division of Biostatistics (W.S.H.), Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First St SW, Mayo E-2 B, Rochester, MN 55905. From the 2001 RSNA scientific assembly. Received May 15, 2002; revision requested July 12; final revision received January 2, 2003; accepted February 24. Address correspondence to J.G.F. (e-mail: fletcher.joel@mayo.edu).

PURPOSE: To assess the value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging at multi–detector row computed tomography (CT) of the pancreas for pancreatic malignancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients suspected of having resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent triple-phase multi–detector row CT. Images obtained during each phase were interpreted by one radiologist who evaluated presence of tumor, vascular invasion, and flow artifacts in the superior mesenteric vein and measured attenuation of tumor, normal pancreas, aorta, and superior mesenteric vein. Results were compared with histologic, follow-up, and correlative imaging findings.

RESULTS: Mean tumor-to-gland attenuation difference was greatest on images obtained in the pancreatic phase (42 HU) versus that on those obtained in the hepatic phase (35 HU) and in the arterial phase (25 HU). For tumor detection, sensitivity of the images obtained in pancreatic (0.97 [29 of 30]) and hepatic (0.93 [28 of 30]) phases was superior to that of those obtained in arterial phase (0.63 [19 of 30]) (P <= .008). For vascular invasion detection, sensitivity of images obtained in the hepatic phase (0.83) was better than that of those obtained in the pancreatic (0.58) and arterial (0.25) phases. Images obtained in the pancreatic phase demonstrated more flow artifacts and decreased attenuation in the superior mesenteric vein, compared with the artifacts revealed on images obtained in the hepatic phase.

CONCLUSION: Routine acquisition of images in the arterial phase is unnecessary for detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Images of the pancreas obtained in the hepatic phase with multi–detector row CT most accurately display vascular invasion.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), multi–detector row, 77.1211, 77.12113 • Computed tomography (CT), phase imaging, 77.1211, 77.12113 • Pancreas, neoplasms, 77.32 • Pancreas, CT, 77.1211




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. H. McCollough, L. Guimaraes, and J. G. Fletcher
In Defense of Body CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2009; 193(1): 28 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
H. Furukawa, K. Uesaka, and N. Boku
Treatment Decision Making in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Multidisciplinary Team Discussion With Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography
Arch Surg, March 1, 2008; 143(3): 275 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Yanaga, K. Awai, Y. Nakayama, T. Nakaura, Y. Tamura, M. Hatemura, and Y. Yamashita
Pancreas: Patient Body Weight tailored Contrast Material Injection Protocol versus Fixed Dose Protocol at Dynamic CT
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 475 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. D. D. Brennan, G. A. Zamboni, V. D. Raptopoulos, and J. B. Kruskal
Comprehensive Preoperative Assessment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with 64-Section Volumetric CT
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2007; 27(6): 1653 - 1666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. D. Brennan, G. Zamboni, J. Sosna, M. P. Callery, C. M.V. Vollmer, V. D. Raptopoulos, and J. B. Kruskal
Virtual Whipple: Preoperative Surgical Planning with Volume-Rendered MDCT Images to Identify Arterial Variants Relevant to the Whipple Procedure
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): W451 - W455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Kondo, M. Kanematsu, S. Goshima, T. Miyoshi, Y. Shiratori, M. Onozuka, N. Moriyama, and K. T. Bae
MDCT of the Pancreas: Optimizing Scanning Delay with a Bolus-Tracking Technique for Pancreatic, Peripancreatic Vascular, and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 751 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Ichikawa, S. M. Erturk, H. Sou, H. Nakajima, T. Tsukamoto, U. Motosugi, and T. Araki
MDCT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: optimal imaging phases and multiplanar reformatted imaging.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1513 - 1520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Booya, J. G. Fletcher, J. E. Huprich, J. M. Barlow, C. D. Johnson, J. L. Fidler, C. A. Solem, W. J. Sandborn, E. V. Loftus Jr, and W. S. Harmsen
Active Crohn Disease: CT Findings and Interobserver Agreement for Enteric Phase CT Enterography
Radiology, December 1, 2006; 241(3): 787 - 795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Schueller, W. Schima, C. Schueller-Weidekamm, M. Weber, A. Stift, M. Gnant, and R. Prokesch
Multidetector CT of Pancreas: Effects of Contrast Material Flow Rate and Individualized Scan Delay on Enhancement of Pancreas and Tumor Contrast
Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 441 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Goshima, M. Kanematsu, H. Kondo, R. Yokoyama, T. Miyoshi, H. Kato, Y. Tsuge, Y. Shiratori, H. Hoshi, M. Onozuka, et al.
Pancreas: Optimal Scan Delay for Contrast-enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 167 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Y. Lee, S. H. Kim, J. M. Lee, S.-W. Kim, J.-Y. Jang, J. K. Han, and B. I. Choi
Preoperative Assessment of Resectability of Hepatic Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Combined CT and Cholangiography with Revised Criteria
Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 113 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. T. Johnson and E. K. Fishman
IV Contrast Selection for MDCT: Current Thoughts and Practice
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 406 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. R. Birchard, R. C. Semelka, W. B. Hyslop, A. Brown, D. Armao, Z. Firat, and G. Vaidean
Suspected Pancreatic Cancer: Evaluation by Dynamic Gadolinium-Enhanced 3D Gradient-Echo MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2005; 185(3): 700 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Imbriaco, A. J. Megibow, A. Ragozzino, R. Liuzzi, P. Mainenti, S. Bortone, L. Camera, and M. Salvatore
Value of the Single-Phase Technique in MDCT Assessment of Pancreatic Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1111 - 1117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]