| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Gastrointestinal Imaging |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (B.S., V.R., M.P.R.) and Surgery (S.I.L., R.A.H.), and Division of General Medicine (R.B.D.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215. From the 2001 RSNA scientific assembly. Received July 9, 2002; revision requested August 23; final revision received March 5, 2003; accepted April 7. Address correspondence to B.S. (e-mail: bsiewert@caregroup.harvard.edu).
PURPOSE: To identify computed tomographic (CT) signs that may help predict possible failure of laparoscopic appendectomy and subsequent conversion to open appendectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 234 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative CT and in whom laparoscopic appendectomy was attempted, 26 required conversion to open appendectomy. Conversion was correlated with the following CT findings: appendix location, appendicolith, cecal wall thickening involving the base of the appendix, lymphadenopathy, and appendiceal diameter. The extent of inflammation was graded by using a six-point scale: 0 meant normal appendix; 1, possibly abnormal appendix (6-mm diameter without other abnormality); 2, abnormal appendix (diameter 
6 mm with wall enhancement) without adjacent fat stranding; 3, abnormal appendix surrounded by fat stranding; 4, abnormal appendix surrounded by fat stranding and fluid; and 5, inflammatory mass or abscess. Student t and 
2 tests were used for statistical analysis of interval and nominal values, respectively.
RESULTS: Although there was a significant difference in appendiceal diameter between the patients in whom laparoscopic appendectomy was successfully completed (11.3 mm ± 3.5 [SD]) and those who required conversion (12.9 mm ± 3.9), no distinct cutoff point was identified. Of the five CT findings evaluated, none was a significant predictor of conversion to open appendectomy. Eleven (7%) of 164 patients with a CT inflammation grade of 0–3 required conversion, whereas 15 (21%) of 70 patients with a grade of 4 or 5 required conversion (P < .04).
CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with appendicitis can be treated with laparoscopic appendectomy. Nevertheless, patients who require conversion to open appendectomy tend to have high CT inflammation grades of 4 or 5, which indicate the presence of periappendiceal fluid or an inflammatory mass or abscess.
© RSNA, 2003
Index terms: Appendicitis, 751.291 • Appendix, CT, 751.12111, 751.12112, 751.12115 • Laparoscopic surgery
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. L. Bennett, T. P. Tanpitukpongse, M. Macari, K. C. Cho, and J. S. Babb CT Diagnosis of Mucocele of the Appendix in Patients with Acute Appendicitis Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2009; 192(3): W103 - W110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. D. Bixby, B. C. Lucey, J. A. Soto, J. M. Theysohn, A. Ozonoff, and J. C. Varghese Perforated versus Nonperforated Acute Appendicitis: Accuracy of Multidetector CT Detection Radiology, December 1, 2006; 241(3): 780 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Oto, R. D. Ernst, W. J. Mileski, T. K. Nishino, O. Le, G. C. Wolfe, and G. Chaljub Localization of Appendix with MDCT and Influence of Findings on Choice of Appendectomy Incision Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 987 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Ganguli, V. Raptopoulos, F. Komlos, B. Siewert, and J. B. Kruskal Right Lower Quadrant Pain: Value of the Nonvisualized Appendix in Patients at Multidetector CT Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 175 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. A. Foley, F. Earnest IV, M. A. Nathan, D. M. Hough, H. J. Schiller, and T. L. Hoskin Differentiation of Nonperforated from Perforated Appendicitis: Accuracy of CT Diagnosis and Relationship of CT Findings to Length of Hospital Stay Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 89 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
