Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print September 25, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2292020500
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2292020500v1
229/2/423    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kuroki, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kuroki, M.
(Radiology 2003;229:423-428.)
© RSNA, 2003


Experimental Studies

Gene Transfer with Echo-enhanced Contrast Agents: Comparison between Albunex, Optison, and Levovist in Mice—Initial Results1

Tieli Li, MD, PhD, Katsuro Tachibana, MD, PhD, Motomu Kuroki, PhD and Masahide Kuroki, MD, PhD

1 From the Molecular Oncology Center (T.L., Motumu Kuroki, Masahide Kuroki) and Department of Anatomy (K.T.), Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Nanakuma 7–45-1, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan. Received April 29, 2002; revision requested July 10; final revision received January 31, 2003; accepted March 10. Supported in part by the Central Research Institute of Fukuoka University and Grant-in-Aid for High-Technology Research and Scientific Research [C] from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture. Address correspondence to K.T.

PURPOSE: To determine if commercially available echo-enhanced microbubble contrast agents could be used to increase gene transfection efficiency by means of relatively low-intensity ultrasound-mediated microbubble destruction in skeletal muscles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three types of ultrasound microbubble contrast agents (0.01 mL of albumin [Albunex] and human albumin [Optison] and 10 mg/mL of SH U 508A [Levovist]) were each separately mixed with the reporter plasmid DNA (25 µg) encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP) prior to intramuscular injection into the quadriceps muscle of a mouse thigh bilaterally (seven mice per contrast agent). One of the muscle sites that was injected with plasmid DNA was irradiated with low-intensity therapeutic ultrasound (1 MHz) at an intensity of 2.0 W/cm2 for 2 minutes. Mice were sacrificed 7 days after ultrasound treatment for gene expression assay. The number of GFP-expressing muscle fibers was counted. Statistical significance was determined with a two-tailed Student t test. P < .05 was considered to indicate statistically significant difference.

RESULTS: Muscle tissue exposed to ultrasound with air-filled Albunex or Levovist microbubbles revealed no difference in the number of GFP-expressing muscle fibers compared with the control non–ultrasound-exposed muscle. Albumin-coated octafluoropropane gas-filled Optison microbubbles showed a 10-fold increase in the number of GFP-expressing fibers (P < .05).

CONCLUSION: Low-intensity ultrasound with echo-enhanced Optison induced efficient gene transfer unlike that with Albunex or Levovist.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Animals • Experimental study • Genes and genetics • Microbubbles • Ultrasound (US), contrast media




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
V R Stewart and P S Sidhu
New directions in ultrasound: microbubble contrast.
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2006; 79(939): 188 - 194.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
X. Wang, H.-D. Liang, B. Dong, Q.-L. Lu, and M. J. K. Blomley
Gene Transfer with Microbubble Ultrasound and Plasmid DNA into Skeletal Muscle of Mice: Comparison between Commercially Available Microbubble Contrast Agents
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 224 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. Hauff, S. Seemann, R. Reszka, M. Schultze-Mosgau, M. Reinhardt, T. Buzasi, T. Plath, S. Rosewicz, and M. Schirner
Evaluation of Gas-filled Microparticles and Sonoporation as Gene Delivery System: Feasibility Study in Rodent Tumor Models
Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 572 - 578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
P.A Dijkmans, L.J.M Juffermans, R.J.P Musters, A van Wamel, F.J ten Cate, W van Gilst, C.A Visser, N de Jong, and O Kamp
Microbubbles and ultrasound: from diagnosis to therapy
Eur J Echocardiogr, August 1, 2004; 5(4): 245 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Blomley
Which US Microbubble Contrast Agent Is Best for Gene Therapy?
Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 297 - 298.
[Full Text] [PDF]