|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Experimental Studies |
1 From the Molecular Oncology Center (T.L., Motumu Kuroki, Masahide Kuroki) and Department of Anatomy (K.T.), Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Nanakuma 745-1, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan. Received April 29, 2002; revision requested July 10; final revision received January 31, 2003; accepted March 10. Supported in part by the Central Research Institute of Fukuoka University and Grant-in-Aid for High-Technology Research and Scientific Research [C] from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture. Address correspondence to K.T.
PURPOSE: To determine if commercially available echo-enhanced microbubble contrast agents could be used to increase gene transfection efficiency by means of relatively low-intensity ultrasound-mediated microbubble destruction in skeletal muscles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three types of ultrasound microbubble contrast agents (0.01 mL of albumin [Albunex] and human albumin [Optison] and 10 mg/mL of SH U 508A [Levovist]) were each separately mixed with the reporter plasmid DNA (25 µg) encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP) prior to intramuscular injection into the quadriceps muscle of a mouse thigh bilaterally (seven mice per contrast agent). One of the muscle sites that was injected with plasmid DNA was irradiated with low-intensity therapeutic ultrasound (1 MHz) at an intensity of 2.0 W/cm2 for 2 minutes. Mice were sacrificed 7 days after ultrasound treatment for gene expression assay. The number of GFP-expressing muscle fibers was counted. Statistical significance was determined with a two-tailed Student t test. P < .05 was considered to indicate statistically significant difference.
RESULTS: Muscle tissue exposed to ultrasound with air-filled Albunex or Levovist microbubbles revealed no difference in the number of GFP-expressing muscle fibers compared with the control nonultrasound-exposed muscle. Albumin-coated octafluoropropane gas-filled Optison microbubbles showed a 10-fold increase in the number of GFP-expressing fibers (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Low-intensity ultrasound with echo-enhanced Optison induced efficient gene transfer unlike that with Albunex or Levovist.
© RSNA, 2003
Index terms: Animals Experimental study Genes and genetics Microbubbles Ultrasound (US), contrast media
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V R Stewart and P S Sidhu New directions in ultrasound: microbubble contrast. Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2006; 79(939): 188 - 194. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang, H.-D. Liang, B. Dong, Q.-L. Lu, and M. J. K. Blomley Gene Transfer with Microbubble Ultrasound and Plasmid DNA into Skeletal Muscle of Mice: Comparison between Commercially Available Microbubble Contrast Agents Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 224 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Hauff, S. Seemann, R. Reszka, M. Schultze-Mosgau, M. Reinhardt, T. Buzasi, T. Plath, S. Rosewicz, and M. Schirner Evaluation of Gas-filled Microparticles and Sonoporation as Gene Delivery System: Feasibility Study in Rodent Tumor Models Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 572 - 578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.A Dijkmans, L.J.M Juffermans, R.J.P Musters, A van Wamel, F.J ten Cate, W van Gilst, C.A Visser, N de Jong, and O Kamp Microbubbles and ultrasound: from diagnosis to therapy Eur J Echocardiogr, August 1, 2004; 5(4): 245 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Blomley Which US Microbubble Contrast Agent Is Best for Gene Therapy? Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 297 - 298. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||