Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2292021594
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birdwell, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Jackman, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Birdwell, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Jackman, R. J.
(Radiology 2003;229:541-544.)
© RSNA, 2003


Breast Imaging

Clip or Marker Migration 5–10 Weeks after Stereotactic 11-gauge Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy: Report of Two Cases1

Robyn L. Birdwell, MD and Roger J. Jackman, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305 (R.L.B.), and the Department of Radiology, Palo Alto Medical Clinic. Received November 27, 2002; revision requested January 30, 2003; revision received February 25; accepted April 14. Address correspondence to R.L.B. (e-mail: birdwell@stanford.edu).

Two women, aged 50 and 51 years, underwent stereotactic, 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy from the cranial approach of small lesions in the upper outer quadrant of the right breast with removal of lesions that were detected with mammography. Postbiopsy mammograms showed the metal clip or marker at the biopsy sites in both patients. Histologic analysis of both lesions indicated atypical hyperplasia. Mammograms obtained prior to surgical excision showed caudal z-axis migration of the clip or marker to be 6.5 cm at 5 weeks and 4.5 cm at 10 weeks, respectively. By ignoring the clip or marker that had migrated to an inaccurate location and by using internal and external breast landmarks to guide presurgical excision needle localization, the biopsy sites were successfully excised in both patients.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Breast, biopsy, 01.1261 • Breast neoplasms, surgery, 00.44




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Calhoun, A. Giuliano, and R. J. Brenner
Intraoperative Loss of Core Biopsy Clips: Clinical Implications
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): W196 - W200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. R. Parikh
Delayed Migration of Gel Mark Ultra Clip Within 15 Days of 11-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Stereotactic Breast Biopsy
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 203 - 206.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Parikh
Clip Migration Within 15 Days of 11-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Stereotactic Breast Biopsy
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2005; 184(3_supp): S43 - S46.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.