Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2293021746
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernal, B.
Right arrow Articles by Altman, N. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bernal, B.
Right arrow Articles by Altman, N. R.
(Radiology 2003;229:651-658.)
© RSNA, 2003

Pediatric Imaging

Speech Delay in Children: A Functional MR Imaging Study1

Byron Bernal, MD and Nolan R. Altman, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Miami Childrens’ Hospital, 3100 SW 62nd Ave, Miami, FL 33155. From the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received December 16, 2002; revision requested February 27, 2003; final revision received July 9; accepted July 16. Address correspondence to N.R.A. (e-mail: nolan.altman@mch.com).

PURPOSE: To determine if children with speech delay who have been sedated have patterns of activation to passive language paradigms that are different than those of children with normal speech.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen children with speech delay (age range, 2–7 years; mean, 4.0 years) and 35 age-matched children with normal speech (age range, 2–8 years; mean, 4.2 years) were evaluated. The subjects in the control group were selected from patients referred for conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. All children had absence of auditory impairment or mental retardation, and MR findings indicated that brain structure was normal. Sedation was achieved with pentobarbital (3–5 mg/kg) or chloral hydrate (75 mg/kg). Functional MR imaging was performed with a single-shot echo-planar blood oxygen-level–dependent technique and a passive block paradigm, in which the child listened to his or her mother’s prerecorded voice. Statistical postprocessing of functional MR images was performed with the t test and cluster detection methods. Comparison between groups was performed depending on the type of data with a nonparametrical Mann-Whitney test, parametrical t test, or Fisher exact test.

RESULTS: Five (83%) of the six children older than 3 years with speech delay had lateralized activation of functional MR imaging signal in the right hemisphere. Ten (71%) of 14 age-matched patients with normal speech had activation in the left hemisphere when exposed to the same passive listening tasks. When these groups were compared, this difference was statistically significant. (P = .036). No statistically significant lateralization was seen across all age groups in children with activation.

CONCLUSION: Children older than 3 years with speech delay have activation in the right hemisphere more frequently than children older than 3 years with normal speech, who often have the expected finding of activation in the left hemisphere.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Brain, growth and development • Brain, MR, 138.121413 • Magnetic resonance (MR), functional imaging, 138.121413 • Magnetic resonance (MR), in infants and children, 138.121413 • Speech




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BrainHome page
A. J. O. Whitehouse and D. V. M. Bishop
Cerebral dominance for language function in adults with specific language impairment or autism
Brain, December 1, 2008; 131(12): 3193 - 3200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]