|
|
||||||||
Thoracic Imaging |
1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 1820, A-1090 Vienna, Austria (A.A.B.); and Departments of Chest Medicine (A.V.M., M.E.) and Radiology (P.S., P.A.G.) and Statistical Unit, Institute of Interdisciplinary Research in Human and Molecular Biology (V.D.M.), University of Brussels, Belgium. Received July 10, 2002; revision requested August 29; final revision received March 18, 2003; accepted April 2. Address correspondence to A.A.B. (e-mail: alexander.bankier@univie.ac.at).
PURPOSE: To evaluate the intrapatient reproducibility of the extent and anatomic distribution of air trapping at sequential expiratory thin-section computed tomographic (CT) examinations in heart-lung transplant recipients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen heart-lung transplant recipients (eight with and 11 without bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome [BOS]) underwent three expiratory CT examinations within 1 hour. Residual volumes were measured at CT. Anatomic distribution and extent of air trapping were scored by two observers at two independent readings, and the reproducibility of observations was calculated for each feature. CT examination results were compared by using an analysis of variance that took into account interobserver and BOS and non-BOS effects. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was calculated to test the association between variability of residual volumes and variability of the extent of air trapping.
RESULTS: Residual volumes did not significantly differ between the three CT examinations (P = .556). Reproducibility values for findings of anatomic distribution of air trapping ranged from 84% to 95%, with a tendency toward improved reproducibility in patients without BOS. Mean reproducibility values for the extent of air trapping ranged from 97.1% to 97.7%, and no substantial difference in these values between patients with and those without BOS was observed. The Spearman rank coefficient for the correlation between variability of residual volumes and variability of extent of air trapping ranged from 0.382 to 0.568 (P = .105.016). No interobserver effect was detected (P = .944).
CONCLUSION: Anatomic distribution and extent are reproducible characteristics of air trapping. No substantial variability of air trapping occurs in functionally stable heart-lung transplant recipients.
© RSNA, 2003
Index terms: Bronchiolitis obliterans, 60.2191 Heart, transplantation, 51.459 Lung, air trapping Lung, CT, 60.12118 Lung, transplantation, 60.459
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. A. Bankier, S. Mehrain, D. Kienzl, M. Weber, M. Estenne, and P. A. Gevenois Regional Heterogeneity of Air Trapping at Expiratory Thin-Section CT of Patients with Bronchiolitis: Potential Implications for Dose Reduction and CT Protocol Planning Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 862 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Hansell, A. A. Bankier, H. MacMahon, T. C. McLoud, N. L. Muller, and J. Remy Fleischner Society: Glossary of Terms for Thoracic Imaging Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 697 - 722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. A. Aziz United Kingdom Cystic Fibrosis Gene Therapy Consortium Multidose Trial: The Proposed Use of Computed Tomography Proceedings of the ATS, August 1, 2007; 4(4): 355 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Bankier, C. Schaefer-Prokop, V. De Maertelaer, D. Tack, P. Jaksch, W. Klepetko, and P. A. Gevenois Air Trapping: Comparison of Standard-Dose and Simulated Low-Dose Thin-Section CT Techniques Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 898 - 906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z A Aziz, J C Davies, E W Alton, A U Wells, D M Geddes, and D M Hansell Computed tomography and cystic fibrosis: promises and problems Thorax, February 1, 2007; 62(2): 181 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P A de Jong, J D Dodd, H O Coxson, C Storness-Bliss, P D Pare, J R Mayo, and R D Levy Bronchiolitis obliterans following lung transplantation: early detection using computed tomographic scanning Thorax, September 1, 2006; 61(9): 799 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |