|
|
||||||||
Statistical Concepts Series |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (C.L.S.) and Biostatistics (C.W.G.), University of Florida College of Medicine, PO Box 100374, Gainesville, FL 32610. Received July 2, 2003; revision requested July 30; revision received August 4; accepted August 13. Address correspondence to C.L.S. (e-mail: sistrc@radiology.ufl.edu).
Perhaps the most common and familiar way that the results of medical research and epidemiologic investigations are summarized is in a table of counts. Numbers of subjects with and without the outcome of interest are listed for each treatment or risk factor group. By using the study sample data thus tabulated, investigators quantify the association between treatment or risk factor and outcome. Three simple statistical calculations are used for this purpose: difference in proportions, relative risk, and odds ratio. The appropriate use of these statistics to estimate the association between treatment or risk factor and outcome in the relevant population depends on the design of the research. Herein, the enumeration of proportions, odds ratios, and risks and the relationships between them are demonstrated, along with guidelines for use and interpretation of these statistics appropriate to the type of study that gives rise to the data.
© RSNA, 2004
Index terms: Statistical analysis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Bierry, N. Holl, F. Kellner, S. Riehm, M.-N. Roedlich, M. Greget, and F. Veillon Venous Thromboembolism and Occult Malignancy: Simultaneous Detection During Pulmonary CT Angiography with CT Venography Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): 885 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. DeWitt, H. A. Glick, D. A. Albert, M. M. Joffe, and F. Wolfe Medicare Coverage of Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} Inhibitors as an Influence on Physicians' Prescribing Behavior Arch Intern Med, January 9, 2006; 166(1): 57 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||