|
|
||||||||
Vascular and Interventional Radiology |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan (K.A.); and Department of Radiology, Rinku General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan (K.H., S.H.). Received August 22, 2002; revision requested October 29; final revision received May 16, 2003; accepted June 18. Address correspondence to K.A., Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjyo, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan.
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of duration and rate of contrast material injection on aortic peak time and peak enhancement in an injection protocol in which the contrast material dose is adjusted according to patient weight.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred ninety-nine patients were randomly divided into three groups in which the fixed duration of contrast material injection was 25 seconds (group A) or 35 seconds (group B) or the fixed injection rate was 4.0 mL/sec (group C). Computed tomography (CT) at the L3 vertebral level was performed before and after contrast material injection. Aortic peak time, aortic peak enhancement, and period when aortic enhancement is 200 HU or greater (T200) were calculated. The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (r) was used to investigate relationships between patient weight and aortic peak time, aortic peak enhancement, and T200 in each group.
RESULTS: A significant correlation between aortic peak time and patient weight (r = 0.91, P < .001) was observed in group C. No significant correlations between patient weight and aortic peak time were observed in group A (r = 0.16, P = .21) or B (r = -0.05, P = .69). A significant inverse correlation between aortic peak enhancement and patient weight (r = -0.70, P < .001) was observed in group C. No significant correlations between patient weight and aortic peak enhancement were observed in group A (r = 0.09, P = .48) or B (r = 0.10, P = .41). A significant correlation between T200 and patient weight (r = 0.72, P < .001) was observed in group C. No significant correlations between patient weight and T200 were observed in group A (r = 0.12, P = .34) or B (r = 0.001, P = .99).
CONCLUSION: Aortic peak time, aortic peak enhancement, and T200 were closely related to injection duration in the protocol with contrast material dose determined according to patient weight.
© RSNA, 2004
Index terms: Aorta, CT, 981.12916 Computed tomography (CT), contrast enhancement, 981.12916
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Fei, X. Du, Q. Yang, Y. Shen, P. Li, J. Liao, and K. Li 64-MDCT Coronary Angiography: Phantom Study of Effects of Vascular Attenuation on Detection of Coronary Stenosis Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 43 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. F. Behrendt, A. H. Mahnken, S. Stanzel, P. Seidensticker, E. Jost, R. W. Gunther, and G. Muhlenbruch Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast Media Concentrations for Combined Abdominal and Thoracic MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 145 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Okada, T. Murakami, S. Kumano, I. Imaoka, T. Shimono, R. Ashikaga, and M. Hosono Comparison Between One-Route and Two-Route Injection for Liver and Aortic Enhancement Using MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W323 - W326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Kerl, J. G. Ravenel, S. A. Nguyen, P. Suranyi, C. Thilo, P. Costello, W. Bautz, and U. J. Schoepf Right Heart: Split-Bolus Injection of Diluted Contrast Medium for Visualization at Coronary CT Angiography Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 356 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yanaga, K. Awai, T. Nakaura, T. Namimoto, S. Oda, Y. Funama, and Y. Yamashita Optimal Contrast Dose for Depiction of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Dynamic CT Using 64-MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 1003 - 1009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Chu, B. N. Joe, A. C. A. Westphalen, E. M. Webb, F. V. Coakley, and B. M. Yeh Patient-specific Time to Peak Abdominal Organ Enhancement Varies with Time to Peak Aortic Enhancement at MR Imaging Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 779 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yanaga, K. Awai, Y. Nakayama, T. Nakaura, Y. Tamura, M. Hatemura, and Y. Yamashita Pancreas: Patient Body Weight tailored Contrast Material Injection Protocol versus Fixed Dose Protocol at Dynamic CT Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 475 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Ho, R. C. Nelson, and D. M. DeLong Determining Contrast Medium Dose and Rate on Basis of Lean Body Weight: Does This Strategy Improve Patient-to-Patient Uniformity of Hepatic Enhancement during Multi-Detector Row CT? Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 431 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sultana, K. Awai, Y. Nakayama, T. Nakaura, D. Liu, M. Hatemura, Y. Funama, S. Morishita, and Y. Yamashita Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinomas: Bolus Tracking with a 40-Detector CT Scanner to Time Arterial Phase Imaging Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 140 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Goshima, M. Kanematsu, H. Kondo, R. Yokoyama, T. Miyoshi, H. Kato, Y. Tsuge, Y. Shiratori, H. Hoshi, M. Onozuka, et al. Pancreas: Optimal Scan Delay for Contrast-enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 167 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schoellnast, H. A. Deutschmann, A. Berghold, G. A. Fritz, G. J. Schaffler, and M. Tillich MDCT Angiography of the Pulmonary Arteries: Influence of Body Weight, Body Mass Index, and Scan Length on Arterial Enhancement at Different Iodine Flow Rates Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 1074 - 1078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Utsunomiya, K. Awai, T. Sakamoto, T. Nishiharu, J. Urata, A. Taniguchi, T. Nakaura, and Y. Yamashita Cardiac 16-MDCT for anatomic and functional analysis: assessment of a biphasic contrast injection protocol. Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 638 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kubo, E. Tadamura, M. Yamamuro, R. Hosokawa, T. Kimura, T. Kita, M. Komeda, and K. Togashi Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac MDCT angiography using reduced dose of contrast material. Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 548 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Utsunomiya, K. Awai, Y. Tamura, T. Nishiharu, J. Urata, T. Sakamoto, A. Taniguchi, and Y. Yamashita 16-MDCT Aortography with a Low-Dose Contrast Material Protocol Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 374 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Awai, A. Hatcho, Y. Nakayama, S. Kusunoki, D. Liu, M. Hatemura, Y. Funama, M. Denbo, N. Sato, and Y. Yamashita Simulation of Aortic Peak Enhancement on MDCT Using a Contrast Material Flow Phantom: Feasibility Study Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 379 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. T. Johnson and E. K. Fishman IV Contrast Selection for MDCT: Current Thoughts and Practice Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 406 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-J. Kim, Y. E. Chung, K. W. Kim, J.-J. Chung, J. S. Lim, Y. T. Oh, and J. H. Kim Variation of the Time to Aortic Enhancement of Fixed-Duration Versus Fixed-Rate Injection Protocols Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 185 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. T. Bae, K. Awai, and Y. Yamashita Comparison of Moderate versus High Concentration of Contrast Media Injected at the Same Total Iodine Dose and Fixed Injection Duration * Drs Awai and Yamashita respond: Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 740 - 741. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Awai, M. Inoue, Y. Yagyu, M. Watanabe, T. Sano, S. Nin, R. Koike, Y. Nishimura, and Y. Yamashita Moderate versus High Concentration of Contrast Material for Aortic and Hepatic Enhancement and Tumor-to-Liver Contrast at Multi-Detector Row CT Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 682 - 688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |