Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2301021008
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Awai, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hori, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Awai, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hori, S.
(Radiology 2004;230:142-150.)
© RSNA, 2004


Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Effect of Contrast Material Injection Duration and Rate on Aortic Peak Time and Peak Enhancement at Dynamic CT Involving Injection Protocol with Dose Tailored to Patient Weight1

Kazuo Awai, MD, Kumiko Hiraishi, MD2 and Shinichi Hori, MD2

1 From the Department of Radiology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan (K.A.); and Department of Radiology, Rinku General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan (K.H., S.H.). Received August 22, 2002; revision requested October 29; final revision received May 16, 2003; accepted June 18. Address correspondence to K.A., Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjyo, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of duration and rate of contrast material injection on aortic peak time and peak enhancement in an injection protocol in which the contrast material dose is adjusted according to patient weight.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred ninety-nine patients were randomly divided into three groups in which the fixed duration of contrast material injection was 25 seconds (group A) or 35 seconds (group B) or the fixed injection rate was 4.0 mL/sec (group C). Computed tomography (CT) at the L3 vertebral level was performed before and after contrast material injection. Aortic peak time, aortic peak enhancement, and period when aortic enhancement is 200 HU or greater (T200) were calculated. The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (r) was used to investigate relationships between patient weight and aortic peak time, aortic peak enhancement, and T200 in each group.

RESULTS: A significant correlation between aortic peak time and patient weight (r = 0.91, P < .001) was observed in group C. No significant correlations between patient weight and aortic peak time were observed in group A (r = 0.16, P = .21) or B (r = -0.05, P = .69). A significant inverse correlation between aortic peak enhancement and patient weight (r = -0.70, P < .001) was observed in group C. No significant correlations between patient weight and aortic peak enhancement were observed in group A (r = 0.09, P = .48) or B (r = 0.10, P = .41). A significant correlation between T200 and patient weight (r = 0.72, P < .001) was observed in group C. No significant correlations between patient weight and T200 were observed in group A (r = 0.12, P = .34) or B (r = 0.001, P = .99).

CONCLUSION: Aortic peak time, aortic peak enhancement, and T200 were closely related to injection duration in the protocol with contrast material dose determined according to patient weight.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Aorta, CT, 981.12916 • Computed tomography (CT), contrast enhancement, 981.12916




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
X. Fei, X. Du, Q. Yang, Y. Shen, P. Li, J. Liao, and K. Li
64-MDCT Coronary Angiography: Phantom Study of Effects of Vascular Attenuation on Detection of Coronary Stenosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 43 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. F. Behrendt, A. H. Mahnken, S. Stanzel, P. Seidensticker, E. Jost, R. W. Gunther, and G. Muhlenbruch
Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast Media Concentrations for Combined Abdominal and Thoracic MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 145 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Okada, T. Murakami, S. Kumano, I. Imaoka, T. Shimono, R. Ashikaga, and M. Hosono
Comparison Between One-Route and Two-Route Injection for Liver and Aortic Enhancement Using MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W323 - W326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Kerl, J. G. Ravenel, S. A. Nguyen, P. Suranyi, C. Thilo, P. Costello, W. Bautz, and U. J. Schoepf
Right Heart: Split-Bolus Injection of Diluted Contrast Medium for Visualization at Coronary CT Angiography
Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 356 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Yanaga, K. Awai, T. Nakaura, T. Namimoto, S. Oda, Y. Funama, and Y. Yamashita
Optimal Contrast Dose for Depiction of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Dynamic CT Using 64-MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 1003 - 1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. L. Chu, B. N. Joe, A. C. A. Westphalen, E. M. Webb, F. V. Coakley, and B. M. Yeh
Patient-specific Time to Peak Abdominal Organ Enhancement Varies with Time to Peak Aortic Enhancement at MR Imaging
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 779 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Yanaga, K. Awai, Y. Nakayama, T. Nakaura, Y. Tamura, M. Hatemura, and Y. Yamashita
Pancreas: Patient Body Weight tailored Contrast Material Injection Protocol versus Fixed Dose Protocol at Dynamic CT
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 475 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. M. Ho, R. C. Nelson, and D. M. DeLong
Determining Contrast Medium Dose and Rate on Basis of Lean Body Weight: Does This Strategy Improve Patient-to-Patient Uniformity of Hepatic Enhancement during Multi-Detector Row CT?
Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 431 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Sultana, K. Awai, Y. Nakayama, T. Nakaura, D. Liu, M. Hatemura, Y. Funama, S. Morishita, and Y. Yamashita
Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinomas: Bolus Tracking with a 40-Detector CT Scanner to Time Arterial Phase Imaging
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 140 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Goshima, M. Kanematsu, H. Kondo, R. Yokoyama, T. Miyoshi, H. Kato, Y. Tsuge, Y. Shiratori, H. Hoshi, M. Onozuka, et al.
Pancreas: Optimal Scan Delay for Contrast-enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 167 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Schoellnast, H. A. Deutschmann, A. Berghold, G. A. Fritz, G. J. Schaffler, and M. Tillich
MDCT Angiography of the Pulmonary Arteries: Influence of Body Weight, Body Mass Index, and Scan Length on Arterial Enhancement at Different Iodine Flow Rates
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 1074 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Utsunomiya, K. Awai, T. Sakamoto, T. Nishiharu, J. Urata, A. Taniguchi, T. Nakaura, and Y. Yamashita
Cardiac 16-MDCT for anatomic and functional analysis: assessment of a biphasic contrast injection protocol.
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 638 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Kubo, E. Tadamura, M. Yamamuro, R. Hosokawa, T. Kimura, T. Kita, M. Komeda, and K. Togashi
Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac MDCT angiography using reduced dose of contrast material.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 548 - 554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Utsunomiya, K. Awai, Y. Tamura, T. Nishiharu, J. Urata, T. Sakamoto, A. Taniguchi, and Y. Yamashita
16-MDCT Aortography with a Low-Dose Contrast Material Protocol
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 374 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Awai, A. Hatcho, Y. Nakayama, S. Kusunoki, D. Liu, M. Hatemura, Y. Funama, M. Denbo, N. Sato, and Y. Yamashita
Simulation of Aortic Peak Enhancement on MDCT Using a Contrast Material Flow Phantom: Feasibility Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 379 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. T. Johnson and E. K. Fishman
IV Contrast Selection for MDCT: Current Thoughts and Practice
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 406 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M.-J. Kim, Y. E. Chung, K. W. Kim, J.-J. Chung, J. S. Lim, Y. T. Oh, and J. H. Kim
Variation of the Time to Aortic Enhancement of Fixed-Duration Versus Fixed-Rate Injection Protocols
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 185 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. T. Bae, K. Awai, and Y. Yamashita
Comparison of Moderate versus High Concentration of Contrast Media Injected at the Same Total Iodine Dose and Fixed Injection Duration * Drs Awai and Yamashita respond:
Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 740 - 741.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Awai, M. Inoue, Y. Yagyu, M. Watanabe, T. Sano, S. Nin, R. Koike, Y. Nishimura, and Y. Yamashita
Moderate versus High Concentration of Contrast Material for Aortic and Hepatic Enhancement and Tumor-to-Liver Contrast at Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 682 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.