|
|
||||||||
Genitourinary Imaging |
1 From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Justus-Liebig Universität Giessen, Klinikstr 36, 35385 Giessen, Germany. Received October 3, 2002; revision requested November 27; final revision received March 30, 2003; accepted May 19. Supported by a grant from Schering, Berlin, Germany. Address correspondence to A.C.L. (e-mail: alexander.langheinrich@radiol.med.uni-giessen.de).
PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of the two-point Patlak plot in the calculation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients without acute renal disorder were included. GFR was calculated by using a two-point Patlak plot technique. The computed tomography (CT) protocol consisted of a plain examination followed by two contrast materialenhanced examinations in the arterial and portovenous phase. Each examination included the entire kidneys and was performed after injection of 120 mL iopromide and 300 mg of iodine per milliliter given per 75 kg of body weight. All examinations were performed with a standard abdominal protocol. Section thickness was 4 x 2.5 mm, and table advance was 12.5 mm. Bolus triggering commenced 10 seconds after the start of contrast medium injection. Twelve dynamic scans were obtained with reduced tube current every 3 seconds to obtain sufficient arterial input function data. Correction for hematocrit level was made by using the unenhanced attenuation of the aorta. As a reference method, plasma clearance of the contrast medium injected for CT was calculated from three iodine plasma concentration measurements obtained 3, 4, and 5 hours after injection. Linear correlation was performed.
RESULTS: GFR was calculated from CT data in 48 patients. Two patients were excluded because of breathing errors. Mean GFR was 80 mL/min (range, 17153 mL/min) as measured with iopromide plasma clearance and 82 mL/min (range, 28148 mL/min) as measured with CT. Linear correlation between the two methods was r = 0.889; GFR calculated with the two-point Patlak plot was equal to 15 plus 0.83 times GFR (plasma clearance). The mean difference between GFRs as determined with the two methods was -1.2 mL/min (95% CI: -27.1, 24.6).
CONCLUSION: Total GFR can be measured accurately with minimally extended triphasic CT in patients without acute renal disorder by using a two-point Patlak plot technique.
© RSNA, 2003
Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), multidetector row, 81.12111, 81.12115 Kidney, CT, 81.12111, 81.12115 Kidney, function
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Boss, P. Martirosian, M. Gehrmann, F. Artunc, T. Risler, N. Oesingmann, C. D. Claussen, F. Schick, K. Kuper, and H.-P. Schlemmer Quantitative Assessment of Glomerular Filtration Rate with MR Gadolinium Slope Clearance Measurements: A Phase I Trial Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 783 - 790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. G. Sommer Can Single-Kidney Glomerular Filtration Rate Be Determined with Contrast-enhanced CT? Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 325 - 326. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Daghini, L. Juillard, J. A. Haas, J. D. Krier, J. C. Romero, and L. O. Lerman Comparison of Mathematic Models for Assessment of Glomerular Filtration Rate with Electron-Beam CT in Pigs Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 417 - 424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||