Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print November 26, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2301021266
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2301021266v1
230/1/221    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hackstein, N.
Right arrow Articles by Langheinrich, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hackstein, N.
Right arrow Articles by Langheinrich, A. C.
(Radiology 2004;230:221-226.)
© RSNA, 2004


Genitourinary Imaging

Glomerular Filtration Rate Measured by Using Triphasic Helical CT with a Two-Point Patlak Plot Technique1

Nils Hackstein, MD, Cornelia Wiegand, Wigbert Stefan Rau, PhD, MD and Alexander Claus Langheinrich, MD

1 From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Justus-Liebig Universität Giessen, Klinikstr 36, 35385 Giessen, Germany. Received October 3, 2002; revision requested November 27; final revision received March 30, 2003; accepted May 19. Supported by a grant from Schering, Berlin, Germany. Address correspondence to A.C.L. (e-mail: alexander.langheinrich@radiol.med.uni-giessen.de).

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of the two-point Patlak plot in the calculation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients without acute renal disorder were included. GFR was calculated by using a two-point Patlak plot technique. The computed tomography (CT) protocol consisted of a plain examination followed by two contrast material–enhanced examinations in the arterial and portovenous phase. Each examination included the entire kidneys and was performed after injection of 120 mL iopromide and 300 mg of iodine per milliliter given per 75 kg of body weight. All examinations were performed with a standard abdominal protocol. Section thickness was 4 x 2.5 mm, and table advance was 12.5 mm. Bolus triggering commenced 10 seconds after the start of contrast medium injection. Twelve dynamic scans were obtained with reduced tube current every 3 seconds to obtain sufficient arterial input function data. Correction for hematocrit level was made by using the unenhanced attenuation of the aorta. As a reference method, plasma clearance of the contrast medium injected for CT was calculated from three iodine plasma concentration measurements obtained 3, 4, and 5 hours after injection. Linear correlation was performed.

RESULTS: GFR was calculated from CT data in 48 patients. Two patients were excluded because of breathing errors. Mean GFR was 80 mL/min (range, 17–153 mL/min) as measured with iopromide plasma clearance and 82 mL/min (range, 28–148 mL/min) as measured with CT. Linear correlation between the two methods was r = 0.889; GFR calculated with the two-point Patlak plot was equal to 15 plus 0.83 times GFR (plasma clearance). The mean difference between GFRs as determined with the two methods was -1.2 mL/min (95% CI: -27.1, 24.6).

CONCLUSION: Total GFR can be measured accurately with minimally extended triphasic CT in patients without acute renal disorder by using a two-point Patlak plot technique.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), multi–detector row, 81.12111, 81.12115 • Kidney, CT, 81.12111, 81.12115 • Kidney, function




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Boss, P. Martirosian, M. Gehrmann, F. Artunc, T. Risler, N. Oesingmann, C. D. Claussen, F. Schick, K. Kuper, and H.-P. Schlemmer
Quantitative Assessment of Glomerular Filtration Rate with MR Gadolinium Slope Clearance Measurements: A Phase I Trial
Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 783 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. G. Sommer
Can Single-Kidney Glomerular Filtration Rate Be Determined with Contrast-enhanced CT?
Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 325 - 326.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Daghini, L. Juillard, J. A. Haas, J. D. Krier, J. C. Romero, and L. O. Lerman
Comparison of Mathematic Models for Assessment of Glomerular Filtration Rate with Electron-Beam CT in Pigs
Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 417 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]