|
|
||||||||
Musculoskeletal Imaging |
1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Taubman Center, Room 2910-G, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0326 (J.A.J.); Advanced Radiology Services, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Mich (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pa (A.P.); and Departments of Radiology (M.T.v.H., J.G.C.) and Orthopaedic Surgery (P.K.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich. From the 1999 RSNA scientific assembly. Received April 12, 2002; revision requested June 21; final revision received April 25, 2003; accepted May 20. Address correspondence to J.A.J. (e-mail: jjacobsn@umich.edu).
PURPOSE: To determine which US signs are important in the diagnosis of a surgically identifiable supraspinatus tendon tear.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive ultrasonographic (US) studies of the shoulder in patients who underwent arthroscopic follow-up were retrospectively reviewed by a musculoskeletal radiologist. US images of the supraspinatus tendon were evaluated for tendon nonvisualization, abnormal tendon echogenicity, tendon thinning, greater tuberosity cortical irregularity, cartilage interface sign, joint fluid, and subacromial-subdeltoid bursal fluid. US findings were compared with arthroscopic results. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated for each US sign in the diagnosis of full-thickness tendon tear and again for any type of supraspinatus tendon tear.
RESULTS: Arthroscopy revealed 21 full-thickness tears, five bursal surface partial-thickness tears, 10 articular surface partial-thickness tears, and 14 patients without tear of the supraspinatus tendon. The presence of greater tuberosity cortical irregularity and joint fluid was most important in the diagnosis of full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tear (sensitivity, 60%; specificity, 100%; positive predictive value, 100%; negative predictive value, 78%; accuracy, 84%). For diagnosis of any type of supraspinatus tendon tear (partial or full thickness), tendon nonvisualization, greater tuberosity cortical irregularity, and cartilage interface sign are most important, although a combination of signs did not improve accuracy.
CONCLUSION: Secondary US signs, such as greater tuberosity cortical irregularity and joint fluid, are most valuable in the diagnosis of supraspinatus tendon tear.
© RSNA, 2004
Index terms: Shoulder, injuries, 414.4813 Shoulder, US, 414.1298 Tendons, injuries, 414.4813 Tendons, US, 414.1298
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. Studler, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, B. Jost, V. Rousson, J. Hodler, and M. Zanetti Abnormalities of the Lesser Tuberosity on Radiography and MRI: Association with Subscapularis Tendon Lesions Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 100 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Fritz, H. A. Ouellette, T. A. O'Hanley, A. Kassarjian, and W. E. Palmer Cystic Changes at Supraspinatus and Infraspinatus Tendon Insertion Sites: Association with Age and Rotator Cuff Disorders in 238 Patients Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 239 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Herold, M. Bachthaler, O. W. Hamer, R. Hente, S. Feuerbach, C. Fellner, M. Strotzer, M. Lenhart, and C. Paetzel Indirect MR Arthrography of the Shoulder: Use of Abduction and External Rotation to Detect Full- and Partial-Thickness Tears of the Supraspinatus Tendon Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 152 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. C. M. Rutten, G. J. Jager, and J. G. Blickman From the RSNA Refresher Courses: US of the Rotator Cuff: Pitfalls, Limitations, and Artifacts. RadioGraphics, March 1, 2006; 26(2): 589 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Papatheodorou, P. Ellinas, F. Takis, A. Tsanis, I. Maris, and N. Batakis US of the Shoulder: Rotator Cuff and Non-Rotator Cuff Disorders RadioGraphics, January 1, 2006; 26(1): e23 - e23. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Moosikasuwan, T. T. Miller, and B. J. Burke Rotator Cuff Tears: Clinical, Radiographic, and US Findings RadioGraphics, November 1, 2005; 25(6): 1591 - 1607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |