Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2301020418
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kolowich, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kolowich, P.
(Radiology 2004;230:234-242.)
© RSNA, 2004


Musculoskeletal Imaging

Full-Thickness and Partial-Thickness Supraspinatus Tendon Tears: Value of US Signs in Diagnosis1

Jon A. Jacobson, MD, Scott Lancaster, MD, Amitesh Prasad, MD, Marnix T. van Holsbeeck, MD, Josesph G. Craig, MB, ChB and Patricia Kolowich, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Taubman Center, Room 2910-G, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0326 (J.A.J.); Advanced Radiology Services, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Mich (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pa (A.P.); and Departments of Radiology (M.T.v.H., J.G.C.) and Orthopaedic Surgery (P.K.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich. From the 1999 RSNA scientific assembly. Received April 12, 2002; revision requested June 21; final revision received April 25, 2003; accepted May 20. Address correspondence to J.A.J. (e-mail: jjacobsn@umich.edu).

PURPOSE: To determine which US signs are important in the diagnosis of a surgically identifiable supraspinatus tendon tear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive ultrasonographic (US) studies of the shoulder in patients who underwent arthroscopic follow-up were retrospectively reviewed by a musculoskeletal radiologist. US images of the supraspinatus tendon were evaluated for tendon nonvisualization, abnormal tendon echogenicity, tendon thinning, greater tuberosity cortical irregularity, cartilage interface sign, joint fluid, and subacromial-subdeltoid bursal fluid. US findings were compared with arthroscopic results. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated for each US sign in the diagnosis of full-thickness tendon tear and again for any type of supraspinatus tendon tear.

RESULTS: Arthroscopy revealed 21 full-thickness tears, five bursal surface partial-thickness tears, 10 articular surface partial-thickness tears, and 14 patients without tear of the supraspinatus tendon. The presence of greater tuberosity cortical irregularity and joint fluid was most important in the diagnosis of full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tear (sensitivity, 60%; specificity, 100%; positive predictive value, 100%; negative predictive value, 78%; accuracy, 84%). For diagnosis of any type of supraspinatus tendon tear (partial or full thickness), tendon nonvisualization, greater tuberosity cortical irregularity, and cartilage interface sign are most important, although a combination of signs did not improve accuracy.

CONCLUSION: Secondary US signs, such as greater tuberosity cortical irregularity and joint fluid, are most valuable in the diagnosis of supraspinatus tendon tear.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Shoulder, injuries, 414.4813 • Shoulder, US, 414.1298 • Tendons, injuries, 414.4813 • Tendons, US, 414.1298




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
U. Studler, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, B. Jost, V. Rousson, J. Hodler, and M. Zanetti
Abnormalities of the Lesser Tuberosity on Radiography and MRI: Association with Subscapularis Tendon Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 100 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. B. Fritz, H. A. Ouellette, T. A. O'Hanley, A. Kassarjian, and W. E. Palmer
Cystic Changes at Supraspinatus and Infraspinatus Tendon Insertion Sites: Association with Age and Rotator Cuff Disorders in 238 Patients
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 239 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Herold, M. Bachthaler, O. W. Hamer, R. Hente, S. Feuerbach, C. Fellner, M. Strotzer, M. Lenhart, and C. Paetzel
Indirect MR Arthrography of the Shoulder: Use of Abduction and External Rotation to Detect Full- and Partial-Thickness Tears of the Supraspinatus Tendon
Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 152 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. J. C. M. Rutten, G. J. Jager, and J. G. Blickman
From the RSNA Refresher Courses: US of the Rotator Cuff: Pitfalls, Limitations, and Artifacts.
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2006; 26(2): 589 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. Papatheodorou, P. Ellinas, F. Takis, A. Tsanis, I. Maris, and N. Batakis
US of the Shoulder: Rotator Cuff and Non-Rotator Cuff Disorders
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2006; 26(1): e23 - e23.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. B. Moosikasuwan, T. T. Miller, and B. J. Burke
Rotator Cuff Tears: Clinical, Radiographic, and US Findings
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2005; 25(6): 1591 - 1607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.