HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2301021517v1 230/1/243    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Strobel, K. Articles by Hodler, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Strobel, K. Articles by Hodler, J.

Suspected Rotator Cuff Lesions: Tissue Harmonic Imaging versus Conventional US of the Shoulder¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (K.S., M.Z., J.H.) and Orthopedic Surgery (L.N.), Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland. Received November 20, 2002; revision requested January 21, 2003; final revision received May 9; accepted June 16. Address correspondence to K.S., Radiologie, Kantonsspital Luzern, 6000 Luzern 16, Switzerland (e-mail: klaus.strobel@ksl.ch).

PURPOSE: To compare tissue harmonic imaging (THI) of the shoulder with conventional ultrasonography (US) in patients suspected of having rotator cuff lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: THI and conventional US images were obtained in 50 patients suspected of having rotator cuff lesions. Images were graded for visibility of acromioclavicular (AC) joint surfaces and rotator cuff tendon contours and substances: Grade 1 meant poor; grade 2, moderate; and grade 3, good visibility. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the diagnosis of AC joint osteoarthritis and accuracy of the diagnosis and rates of underestimation and overestimation of the extent of rotator cuff tears were evaluated. Visibility grade differences were evaluated with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The McNemar test was used to assess differences in diagnoses. Magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography was the reference standard.

RESULTS: Mean visibility grades for readers 1 and 2, respectively, were as follows: for AC joint bone surfaces, 2.1 and 2.0 with THI and 1.7 (P = .010) and 1.7 (P = .16) with conventional US; for AC joint capsule surfaces, 2.2 and 1.9 with THI and 1.8 (P = .005) and 1.8 (P = .34) with US; for supraspinatus tendon contour, 2.6 and 2.2 with THI and 2.1 (P = .001) and 1.9 (P = .055) with US; for supraspinatus tendon substance, 2.2 and 1.9 with THI and 2.0 (P = .036) and 1.7 (P = .070) with US; for subscapularis tendon contour, 2.4 and 2.1 with THI and 2.2 (P = .07) and 2.0 (P = .25) with US; and for subscapularis tendon substance, 1.8 and 1.7 with THI and 2.0 (P = .86) and 1.7 (P = .91) with US. Diagnostic accuracies for the supraspinatus tendon for readers 1 and 2, respectively, were 84% and 74% with THI and 86% and 70% with US (P > .99 for both readers). Corresponding values for the subscapularis tendon were 78% and 72% with THI and 64% (P = .27) and 52% (P = .006) with US.

CONCLUSION: Joint and tendon surface visibility improves with THI, as compared with the visibility achieved with conventional US. THI is superior to conventional US for diagnosis of subscapularis tendon abnormalities.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Magnetic resonance (MR), arthrography, 41.121411, 41.121415, 41.121416, 41.12143 • Shoulder, arthritis, 41.772 • Shoulder, injuries, 41.4813 • Shoulder, US, 41.12989, 41.1299 • Ultrasound (US), harmonic study, 41.12989, 41.1299

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. H. Cha, W. K. Moon, N. Cho, S. M. Kim, S. H. Park, B.-K. Han, Y. H. Choe, J. M. Park, and J.-G. Im Characterization of Benign and Malignant Solid Breast Masses: Comparison of Conventional US and Tissue Harmonic Imaging Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 63 - 69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Mesurolle, H. J. S. Bining, M. E. Khoury, A. Barhdadi, and E. Kao Contribution of tissue harmonic imaging and frequency compound imaging in interventional breast sonography. J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2006; 25(7): 845 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Herold, M. Bachthaler, O. W. Hamer, R. Hente, S. Feuerbach, C. Fellner, M. Strotzer, M. Lenhart, and C. Paetzel Indirect MR Arthrography of the Shoulder: Use of Abduction and External Rotation to Detect Full- and Partial-Thickness Tears of the Supraspinatus Tendon Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 152 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Papatheodorou, P. Ellinas, F. Takis, A. Tsanis, I. Maris, and N. Batakis US of the Shoulder: Rotator Cuff and Non-Rotator Cuff Disorders RadioGraphics, January 1, 2006; 26(1): e23 - e23. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. B. Moosikasuwan, T. T. Miller, and B. J. Burke Rotator Cuff Tears: Clinical, Radiographic, and US Findings RadioGraphics, November 1, 2005; 25(6): 1591 - 1607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]