HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Medina, L. S. Articles by Altman, N. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Medina, L. S. Articles by Altman, N. R.

Functional MR Imaging versus Wada Test for Evaluation of Language Lateralization: Cost Analysis¹

¹ From the Division of Neuroradiology and Health Outcomes, Policy and Economics (HOPE) Center, Department of Radiology, Miami Children’s Hospital, 3100 SW 62 Ave, Miami, FL 33155 (L.S.M., E.A., B.B., N.R.A.). Received August 30, 2002; revision requested October 28; final revision received March 24, 2003; accepted May 8, 2003. Address correspondence to L.S.M. (e-mail: santiago.medina@mch.com).

PURPOSE: To compare the total direct costs (fixed and variable costs) of functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and of the Wada test for evaluation of language lateralization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The direct fixed and variable costs of functional MR imaging (performed in 21 patients with mean age ± SD of 15.5 years ± 8.9) and of the Wada test (performed in 18 patients aged 19.2 years ± 5.4) were determined prospectively with time and motion analyses. The labor of all personnel involved in evaluations of language lateralization was tracked, and involvement times were recorded to the nearest minute. All material items used in the studies were recorded. Costs of labor and of materials were determined from personnel reimbursement data and from vendor pricing, respectively. Direct fixed costs were determined from hospital accounting department records. Means (± SDs) were calculated for all direct fixed and variable costs. Total direct costs were determined for each procedure and compared by using the Student t test.

RESULTS: The total direct costs of the Wada test ($1,130.01 ± $138.40) and of functional MR imaging ($301.82 ± $10.65) were significantly different (P < .001). The cost of the Wada test was 3.7 times higher than that of functional MR imaging.

CONCLUSION: Substantial savings are achievable with the use of functional MR imaging instead of the Wada test to evaluate language lateralization.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Brain, function • Cost-effectiveness • Electroencephalography (EEG), 10.122 • Magnetic resonance (MR), functional imaging, 10.12146

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. Provenzale Advances in Pediatric Neuroradiology: Highlights of the Recent Medical Literature Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2009; 192(1): 19 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Paolicchi Is the Wada Test Still Relevant? Yes Arch Neurol, June 1, 2008; 65(6): 838 - 840. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. S. Medina, B. Bernal, and J. Ruiz Role of Functional MR in Determining Language Dominance in Epilepsy and Nonepilepsy Populations: A Bayesian Analysis Radiology, January 1, 2007; 242(1): 94 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. S. Medina, B. Bernal, C. Dunoyer, L. Cervantes, M. Rodriguez, E. Pacheco, P. Jayakar, G. Morrison, J. Ragheb, and N. R. Altman Seizure Disorders: Functional MR Imaging for Diagnostic Evaluation and Surgical Treatment--Prospective Study Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 247 - 253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]