| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gastrointestinal Imaging |
t Gallix, MD, PhD,
Alvian Lesnik, MD,
Paul-Marie Blayac, MD,
Joseph Pujol, MD,
Jean-Michel Bruel, MD and
Patrice Taourel, MD, PhD
1 From the Department of Radiology, Lapeyronie Hospital, 371 Avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France (N.K., C.C., A.L., P.M.B, J.P., P.T.) and the Department of Radiology, Saint-Eloi Hospital, Montpellier, France (B.G., J.M.B.). Received November 15, 2002; revision requested January 21, 2003; final revision received May 16; accepted June 25. Address correspondence to P.T. (e-mail: p-taourel@chu-montpellier.fr).
PURPOSE: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of ultrasonography (US), Doppler US, and laboratory findings in the diagnosis of appendicitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 125 consecutive patients suspected of having appendicitis were prospectively included for US appendiceal (diameter enlarged to 6 mm or greater, intraluminal fluid, lack of compressibility) and periappendiceal (periileal inflammatory changes, cecal wall thickening, periileal lymph nodes, peritoneal fluid) evaluation, Doppler US evaluation (appendiceal wall signal), and laboratory assessment (leukocytosis, C-reactive protein [CRP]). Definite diagnoses were established at surgery in 61 patients, at endoscopy with biopsy in two patients, and at clinical follow-up in 62 patients.
RESULTS: The prevalence of appendicitis was 46%. The appendix was identified with US in 86% of the patients, which included 96% of patients with and 72% of patients without appendicitis. The most accurate appendiceal finding for appendicitis was a diameter of 6 mm or larger, with a sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of 98%. The lack of visualization of the appendix with US had an NPV of 90%. The most accurate periappendiceal finding of appendicitis was the presence of inflammatory fat changes, with an NPV of 91% and a PPV of 76%, whereas other findings had both NPV and PPV less than 65%. An increase in both white blood cell (WBC) count and CRP level had a PPV of 71%, whereas combined normal WBC count and CRP value had an NPV of 84%.
CONCLUSION: A threshold 6-mm diameter of the appendix under compression is the most accurate US finding for appendicitis and has high NPV and PPV.
© RSNA, 2003
Index terms: Appendicitis, 751.291 • Appendix, US, 751.12981, 751.12983 • Ultrasound (US), comparative studies • Ultrasound (US), Doppler studies
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  I. Pedrosa, M. Lafornara, P. V. Pandharipande, J. D. Goldsmith, and N. M. Rofsky Pregnant Patients Suspected of Having Acute Appendicitis: Effect of MR Imaging on Negative Laparotomy Rate and Appendiceal Perforation Rate Radiology, March 1, 2009; 250(3): 749 - 757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. W. Lee, Y. J. Kim, H. J. Jeon, S. W. Park, S. I. Jung, and J. G. Yi Sonography of Acute Right Lower Quadrant Pain: Importance of Increased Intraabdominal Fat Echo Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2009; 192(1): 174 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Kuzmich, D. C. Howlett, A. Andi, D. Shah, and T. Kuzmich Transabdominal Sonography in Assessment of the Bowel in Adults Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2009; 192(1): 197 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J B Andre, V A Sebastian, R M Ruchman, and S A Saad CT and appendicitis: evaluation of correlation between CT diagnosis and pathological diagnosis Postgrad. Med. J., June 1, 2008; 84(992): 321 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N H Park, C S Park, E J Lee, M S Kim, J A Ryu, J M Bae, and J S Song Ultrasonographic findings identifying the faecal-impacted appendix: differential findings with acute appendicitis Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2007; 80(959): 872 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Moteki and H. Horikoshi New CT Criterion for Acute Appendicitis: Maximum Depth of Intraluminal Appendiceal Fluid Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1313 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Yabunaka, T. Katsuda, S. Sanada, and T. Fukutomi Sonographic Appearance of the Normal Appendix in Adults J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2007; 26(1): 37 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Ripolles, M. J. Martinez, V. Morote, and J. Errando Appendiceal involvement in Crohn's disease: gray-scale sonography and color Doppler flow features. Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 1071 - 1078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Pedrosa, D. Levine, A. D. Eyvazzadeh, B. Siewert, L. Ngo, and N. M. Rofsky MR Imaging Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 891 - 899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Siegel, A. Grubstein, V. Postnikov, O. Moreh, E. Yussim, and M. Cohen Ultrasonography in Patients Without Trauma in the Emergency Department: Impact on Discharge Diagnosis J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2005; 24(10): 1371 - 1376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Keyzer, M. Zalcman, V. De Maertelaer, E. Coppens, M.-A. Bali, P. A. Gevenois, and D. Van Gansbeke Comparison of US and Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT in Patients Suspected of having Acute Appendicitis Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 527 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Chan, S. G. Bicknell, and M. Graham Utility and Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonography in Detecting Appendicitis in a Community Hospital Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1809 - 1812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Menten, P. Lebecque, C. Saint-Martin, and P. Clapuyt Outer Diameter of the Vermiform Appendix: Not a Valid Sonographic Criterion for Acute Appendicitis in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1901 - 1903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
