HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yeh, B. M. Articles by Coakley, F. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yeh, B. M. Articles by Coakley, F. V.

Biliary Tract Depiction in Living Potential Liver Donors: Comparison of Conventional MR, Mangafodipir Trisodium–enhanced Excretory MR, and Multi–Detector Row CT Cholangiography—Initial Experience¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (B.M.Y., B.T., R.S.B., A.Q., F.V.C.) and Surgery (J.P.R.), University of California San Francisco, Box 0628, C-324C, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628. From the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received December 26, 2002; revision requested March 4, 2003; revision received May 30; accepted July 23. Address correspondence to B.M.Y. (e-mail: benyeh@itsa.ucsf.edu).

PURPOSE: To compare biliary tract depiction in living potential liver donors at conventional magnetic resonance (MR), mangafodipir trisodium–enhanced excretory MR, and multi–detector row computed tomographic (CT) cholangiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight living potential liver donors underwent iodipamide meglumine–enhanced CT cholangiography. Eight different potential liver donors then underwent conventional MR cholangiography and mangafodipir trisodium–enhanced excretory MR cholangiography. Two readers independently scored all first-, second-, and third-order biliary branches with a four-point scale from 0 (not seen) to 3 (excellent visualization). Interobserver agreement was calculated by using the weighted statistic. Scores were compared between imaging modalities by using generalized estimating equations. Imaging findings of second-order biliary tract anatomy were compared with intraoperative findings for nine patients.

RESULTS: Interobserver agreement for overall biliary tract visualization was good for CT, conventional MR, and excretory MR cholangiography (with weighted values of 0.76, 0.66, and 0.79, respectively). The mean second-order biliary branch visualization scores for readers 1 and 2, respectively, were significantly higher at CT cholangiography (2.81 and 2.75) than at conventional MR (1.84 and 1.75, P < .001), excretory MR (2.00 and 2.06, P < .001), and combined conventional and excretory MR cholangiography (2.31 and 2.25, P < .01). At CT, conventional MR, and excretory MR cholangiography, respectively, second-order biliary branching anatomy was discernible in eight, five, and seven patients, with second-order biliary branch variants seen in three, two, and two patients. Surgical findings confirmed the pattern of second-order biliary branching seen at CT in five patients, that seen at conventional MR imaging in one patient, and that seen at excretory MR cholangiography in three patients. At surgery, one case of variant biliary anatomy was found to have been missed at CT cholangiography.

CONCLUSION: In living potential liver donors, CT cholangiography enables significantly better biliary tract visualization than conventional or excretory MR cholangiography either alone or in combination.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Bile ducts, anatomy, 763.13, 764.13, 765.13, 766.13 • Bile ducts, CT, 763.12116, 764.12116, 765.12116, 766.12116 • Bile ducts, MR, 763.12142, 764.12142, 765.12142, 766.12142 • Liver, transplantation, 761.89 • Magnetic resonance (MR), cholangiopancreatography, 763.12142, 764.12142, 765.12142, 766.12142

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. I. Sainani, O. A. Catalano, N.-S. Holalkere, A. X. Zhu, P. F. Hahn, and D. V. Sahani Cholangiocarcinoma: Current and Novel Imaging Techniques RadioGraphics, September 1, 2008; 28(5): 1263 - 1287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Breiman, F. V. Coakley, E. M. Webb, J. J. Ellingson, J. P. Roberts, J. Kohr, J. Lutz, N. Knoess, and B. M. Yeh CT Cholangiography in Potential Liver Donors: Effect of Premedication with Intravenous Morphine on Biliary Caliber and Visualization Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 733 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. A. Catalano, A. H. Singh, R. N. Uppot, P. F. Hahn, C. R. Ferrone, and D. V. Sahani Vascular and Biliary Variants in the Liver: Implications for Liver Surgery RadioGraphics, March 1, 2008; 28(2): 359 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. M. Yeh, F. V. Coakley, A. C. Westphalen, B. N. Joe, C. E. Freise, A. Qayyum, R. A. McTaggart, and J. P. Roberts Predicting Biliary Complications in Right Lobe Liver Transplant Recipients according to Distance between Donor's Bile Duct and Corresponding Hepatic Artery Radiology, January 1, 2007; 242(1): 144 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. K. An, J. M. Lee, K.-S. Suh, N. J. Lee, S. H. Kim, Y. J. Kim, J. K. Han, and B. I. Choi Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver MRI as the sole preoperative imaging technique: a prospective study of living liver donors. Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): 1223 - 1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Schroeder, A. Radtke, H. Kuehl, J. F. Debatin, M. Malago, and S. G. Ruehm Evaluation of Living Liver Donors with an All-inclusive 3D Multi-Detector Row CT Protocol Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 900 - 910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Merkle, P. A. Haugan, J. Thomas, T. A. Jaffe, and C. Gullotto 3.0- Versus 1.5-T MR Cholangiography: A Pilot Study Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 516 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kitami, K. Takase, G. Murakami, S. Ko, M. Tsuboi, H. Saito, S. Higano, Y. Nakajima, and S. Takahashi Types and Frequencies of Biliary Tract Variations Associated with a Major Portal Venous Anomaly: Analysis with Multi-Detector Row CT Cholangiography Radiology, January 1, 2006; 238(1): 156 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J. Kim, A. Y. Kim, S. S. Hong, M.-H. Kim, J. H. Byun, H. J. Won, Y. M. Shin, P. N. Kim, H. K. Ha, and M.-G. Lee Biliary Ductal Evaluation of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Three-dimensional Direct Multi-Detector Row CT Cholangiographic Findings versus Surgical and Pathologic Results--Feasibility Study Radiology, December 1, 2005; 238(1): 300 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B. Macdonald, M. A. Haider, K. Khalili, T. K. Kim, M. O'Malley, P. D. Greig, D. R. Grant, G. Lockwood, and M. S. Cattral Relationship Between Vascular and Biliary Anatomy in Living Liver Donors Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 247 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. J. Wang, B. M. Yeh, J. P. Roberts, R. S. Breiman, A. Qayyum, and F. V. Coakley Living Donor Candidates for Right Hepatic Lobe Transplantation: Evaluation at CT Cholangiography--Initial Experience Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 899 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Chen, B. M. Yeh, Z. J. Wang, J. P. Roberts, R. S. Breiman, A. Qayyum, and F. V. Coakley Concordance of Second-Order Portal Venous and Biliary Tract Anatomies on MDCT Angiography and MDCT Cholangiography Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 70 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]